Government plan to process asylum seekers abroad condemned as inhumane

Support us and go ad-free

Asylum seekers could be sent to processing centres abroad under the home secretary’s plans to overhaul the immigration system, according to reports.


The British overseas territory of Gibraltar is a location under consideration by officials, according to the Times, as well as the Isle of Man and other islands off the British coast.

Priti Patel has pledged to stop migrants making the journey across the English Channel and is expected to publish details of plans overhauling the UK’s asylum and immigration system next week.

Home Secretary Priti Patel
Home Secretary Priti Patel (Aaron Chown/PA)

The Times said plans due to be set out by the home secretary will include a consultation on changing the law so that migrants seeking asylum can be sent to processing centres in third countries.

It follows a series of leaks last year suggesting the UK government was considering a number of offshore policies akin to those used in Australia. Speaking on Australia’s refugee policy in 2018, Human Rights Watch reported:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Many refugees and asylum seekers suffer from poor mental health or mental illness due to, or exacerbated by, years of detention and uncertainty about their futures. Self-harm and suicide attempts are frequent. At least 12 refugees and asylum seekers have died on Manus Island and Nauru since 2013. Two refugees with mental health conditions reportedly committed suicide on Manus and Nauru in 2018.

The leaked UK plans included sending asylum seekers to Ascension Island, more than 4,000 miles from the UK, to be processed, and turning disused ferries out at sea into processing centres. The ideas were dismissed by critics at the time as unfeasible, while Labour condemned the suggestion of an asylum processing centre on Ascension Island as “inhumane, completely impractical and wildly expensive”.

Human Rights

The government believes sending migrants to third countries for processing would be compliant with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), according to reports. The Times said the new legislation will include life sentences for people smugglers and the establishment of migrant reception centres on government land, with many currently being housed in hotels.

Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council charity, condemned the proposed policy as “inhumane”.

He told the paper:

We know from the Australian model that offshore detention leads to appalling outcomes including high levels of self-harm and mental illness. It is an inhumane policy that undermines our nation’s proud tradition of providing protection to people fleeing persecution and terror many of whom have gone on to work as doctors and nurses in the NHS.

As we mark the 70th anniversary of the UN convention on refugees later this year we should be welcoming refugees, treating them with compassion.

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. This seems to be a policy of out of sight, out of mind. Has anyone thought to ask the inhabitants of Gibraltar, the Isle of Mann etc what they think of the idea?
      The UK government would be better leading an international movement to renounce the decades old policy of interfering in the affairs of other countries, especially militarily. Add to this a ban on arms sales to war zones and many of the factors that are creating refugees and asylum seekers would be removed.
      The money saved could be given as aid to poor and deprived areas of the World, especially regions such as the Sahel, which are suffering very badly from the effects of climate change. This would further reduce the number of asylum seekers.
      Any chance of a joined up policy from any of the major political parties? I doubt it very much.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.