Watchdog accused of ‘rubber-stamping’ police ‘aggression and violence’ at Sarah Everard vigil

Support us and go ad-free

A watchdog has backed the Metropolitan Police over its handling of the Sarah Everard vigil, saying officers were not heavy handed and remained “calm and professional”.

But campaigners and those who witnessed the police violence on the ground have slammed the report as ‘rubber-stamping’ and described the police’s behaviour as “shameful”:

The Metropolitan Police came under fire after officers waded into the peaceful vigil and attacked protesters. One person who was at the event stated:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

I was shocked at the level of aggression they used to push through and it felt like…something must have happened. And nothing had happened…they just decided to take the girls that were talking on the bandstand and to arrest them and take them away.

“There was no reason for this”

Meanwhile, the Black Protest Legal Support UK group set out why the report contradicted what they observed on the ground:

HMICFRS

The report was written by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS). It was called in to examine the force’s actions after women who attended the event on 13 March were bundled to the ground and arrested.

But it perhaps shouldn’t be a surprise that the HMICFRS report has whitewashed what happened on Clapham Common. After all, it was a recent HMICFRS report that concluded the police had gone too far in allowing protests to happen. As Tom Coburg highlighted for The Canary:

The HMICFRS recommendations, when combined with changes proposed by the Police Bill, arguably amount to a ban on all meaningful protests. In short, if a protest – whether static or otherwise – isn’t approved by the police or other state agencies, then those taking part – ‘aggravated’ or otherwise – could face lengthy jail sentences, and likely consequential blacklisting.

This could be the future of UK policing.

Or to paraphrase the words of George Orwell: if you want a picture of future policing, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.

Sarah Everard vigil

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. On Channel 4 news, the leader of the IOPC was keen to stress how they ‘are not the friends of the police’ and that they ‘challenge them at every opportunity’. I dredged through their past reports and didn’t find one controversial summary that investigated the police. Yes, they often critique the practices of the force – encouraging to do more at this and to do less of that, but when it comes to actual challenge…nothing. When they investigated the Northern Ireland PSNI (I am an Englishman living in NI) they were full of praise of a force doing a difficult job, in difficult circumstances and doing it very well and gaining support from the Catholic community every day. They need to come and live on the North Coast and see how the local police service functions as the state arm of a paramilitary mafia. Yes you can get by as a Catholic but only if you turn a blind eye when one of their friends stamps on your hand or robs you. The PSNI will likely arrest you for intimidation. (I am a non religious protestant)

    2. This is nothing new. It took the miners at Orgreave over 30 years to get some sort of official recognition that they’d been stitched up by the police, who were the real aggressors, possibly acting under orders from politicians. Funnily enough it was a government of very similar political persuasion. Coincidence?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.