Plans to designate two English landscapes as new protected areas

A sunset over British hills
Support us and go ad-free

Two English landscapes could be designated as new protected areas under plans being put forward by the government.

Areas of outstanding natural beauty

Ministers have also launched a programme to fund farmers and landowners in protected landscapes to help nature and people – with projects such as creating ponds, improving public access, or reducing carbon emissions or plastic use on farms.

The Yorkshire Wolds and the Cheshire Sandstone Ridge will be considered for status as areas of outstanding natural beauty (AONBs), while the existing Surrey Hills and Chilterns AONBs could be extended under the proposals.

The government claimed the four areas being considered have the potential to deliver more than 40% of the additional 4,000 square kilometres (1,500 square miles) needed to meet the UK’s commitment to protect 30% of its land by 2030.

But conservationists warn much of the existing protected areas are national parks, and AONBs which do not necessarily deliver for nature, with many of them suffering from overgrazing, poor management, or intensive agriculture.They are calling for urgent action and more resources to improve the natural world across existing protected areas.

The Yorkshire Wolds
The Yorkshire Wolds (East Riding Council/PA)

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Conservationist George Monbiot has written about the “dead” nature of British hills:

  1. You have only to see satellite images of Britain and the rest of Europe to realise that there is something odd about this country. While average forest cover across Europe is 37%, in Britain it is 13%. This contrast is explained by a remarkable quirk of distribution.
  2. In the rest of Europe, as you would expect, the lowlands are largely bare. This is where the land tends to be most fertile and the climate most suitable for agriculture. The uplands, where the soils are poorer and the climate harsher, are largely forested. As a result, the uplands of Europe are its great wildlife refuges, where large predators, wild herbivores and a wide range of species that cannot survive in an agricultural landscape persist.
  1. In Britain, strangely, the lowlands are largely bare and the uplands are even barer. This is not a natural condition. In Norway, at the same latitudes as northern Scotland, in similar climatic conditions, trees cover the high mountainsides. The uplands of Britain would once have been largely forested. But, aside from plantations of exotic conifers, there are few trees in this country above 200m.
  1. Our bare hills are an artefact of three principal activities: sheep farming, deer stalking and grouse shooting. Sheep and deer selectively browse out tree seedlings, ensuring that existing forests cannot regenerate and trees cannot repopulate bare land.
Protected landscapes

Announcing plans to boost nature and public access in protected areas, environment secretary George Eustice said:

We have an opportunity to create a new chapter for our protected landscapes. The work that we are going to take forward will contribute to our commitment to protect 30% of our land by 2030, and boost biodiversity, while designating more areas of the country for their natural beauty.

Our farming in protected landscapes programme will provide additional investment to allow farmers to work in partnership with our National Park Authorities and AONB teams to improve public access.

It comes in response to the Glover Review, commissioned by the government, which recommended “national landscapes” should have a new mission to enhance nature, create wilder areas, and deal with climate change.

It also set out proposals to increase access to protected landscapes for people and create new designated areas.

The government has said it will respond in full to the review later in the year.

The highest point of the Ridge at Raw Head
The highest point of the Ridge at Raw Head (Cheshire Sandstone Ridge Trust/PA)

A lot more to be done

In response to the government announcement, Julian Glover, who led the review, said:

Our national landscapes are the soul of England, beautiful, much-loved, and there for all of us, but they are also under pressure.

We need to do a lot more for nature and more for people, too. Our report set out a plan for a brighter, greener future and I’m delighted that words are now being followed by action.

Dr Richard Benwell, chief executive of the coalition of conservation groups Wildlife and Countryside Link, said:

The creation of new AONBs is excellent, but it must be accompanied by stronger duties and resources for environmental improvement to bring the landscapes to life with nature.

He said three quarters of sites of special scientific interest, which are protected for nature, were in poor condition within designated landscapes. More ambition was needed to fill protected landscapes with wildlife and ensure they play their part in tackling climate change, he urged.

We need quick action now to complete the designations and to strengthen the environmental purposes and resources of AONBs.

Only then can Government reliably include these places in its promise to protect 30% of the land for nature.

Jo Smith, chief executive of Derbyshire Wildlife Trust said the proposed designations “will not magically help meet the target of 30% of land where nature can thrive”. She said:

Instead, what’s needed is urgent action, political will and more resources, to repair and heal the natural world across the National Parks that we already have

She added:

If this Government is serious about its ambition to leave the environment in a better state for the next generation, it must properly fund meaningful action to restore habitats across our protected landscapes

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. At present AONB seems to offer little by way of protection against development and exploitation.
      Housing developments go ahead despite claims that “A high degree of protection is given to an AONB by planning policy at all levels..”.
      HS2 is being driven through the Chilterns AONB with scant regard for the wildlife and habitat. They are “moving” ancient woodland, it would be laughable if it weren’t so tragic.
      To mean anything the status of AONB needs to come with a lot more statutory protection.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.