The war in Yemen has been raging for years, with US support. But now, for the first time in history, the US Senate has voted to end this unauthorized military engagement.
HISTORIC VICTORY: The Senate has voted to stop U.S. military support for the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen. This is the first time ever that the Senate has voted to end an unauthorized war. https://t.co/8SLVTA5m2d
— Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) December 13, 2018
According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies:
Since 2015, the United States has provided intelligence, military advice, and logistical support to the Saudi Arabia–led military intervention in Yemen.
The exact effect the vote will have on the conflict is difficult to know. But this extraordinary move is undoubtedly a major step in the right direction.
Sanders commends colleagues for supporting withdrawal
It’s a very important breakthrough. Both progressives and conservatives have made a profound statement that, 45 years after the passage of the War Powers Act – 45 years later – finally, the United States Senate has come together to use that authority for the first time and say that: ‘the responsibility for war, the constitutional responsibility for war, rests with the United States Congress, not the President, whether that president is a Democrat or a Republican.’
Democrat Chris Murphy, meanwhile, tweeted:
Once in a while, with persistent prodding and shaming, the U.S. Senate rises to the moment.
Final vote on the Lee/Sanders/Murphy resolution to pull America out of the immoral, disastrous Yemen war: 56-41.
A historic day.
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) December 13, 2018
And Republican Rob Portman (who co-sponsored the proposal with Sanders and another Republican senator, Bob Corker) said:
The legislation I co-sponsored with @SenBobCorker has passed the #Senate. We support bringing an end to the conflict in Yemen, and holding the Saudi Arabia government accountable for its actions https://t.co/V1hFu4VVAZ
— Rob Portman (@senrobportman) December 13, 2018
This bipartisan support for ending US involvement in a foreign entanglement is particularly encouraging. For too long, the Republican Party (along with many in the Democratic Party) has reflexively supported traditional allies like Saudi Arabia and US military intervention without question.
But that was not all there was to celebrate. Because on the same day, the Senate also passed another resolution (also sponsored by Republican Bob Corker) that placed the responsibility for the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi on the shoulders of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. And for this bill, the vote was unanimous:
Senate unanimously approves non-binding Corker resolution blaming Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for murder of Jamal Khashoggi https://t.co/l1czzIQdN6
— Igor Bobic (@igorbobic) December 13, 2018
The Trump administration under pressure over Saudi Arabia
The Saudi-led bombing campaign began in 2015 and has led the way in creating one of the world’s most bloody and brutal conflicts today. At least 10,000 have been killed during hostilities, including significant numbers of civilians, with around 40,000 casualties overall. Several tens of thousands more are believed to have died of starvation following famine and displacement. The situation has since degenerated into a humanitarian crisis in which eight million people are now on “the brink of famine”; and the UN has warned this may rise to over 12 million.
Donald Trump and his administration have been stubbornly supporting Saudi Arabia – in spite of the destruction of Yemen and in spite of the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. But the events of 13 December show that even some Republicans are questioning US alliances and foreign military engagements. Clearly, in Congress at least, Washington’s unbending allegiance to Saudi Arabia is no more.
Hopefully, this will now translate to an improvement of the situation on the ground in Yemen. Because without US support, Saudi Arabia might rethink its position and move to de-escalate hostilities. And the Senate’s resolution essentially demands that it does.
Featured image via Twitter
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?