Trump steps up attacks on Bernie Sanders, showing just how scared he really is
With the US presidential election approaching in 11 months’ time, Donald Trump is going into attack mode. But he has a new target. Whereas previously he and his backers were focusing on Democratic Party establishment favourite Joe Biden, they are now homing in on democratic socialist Bernie Sanders. This can only mean one thing: they fear that he will win his party’s nomination. And they’re right to be scared. Because there’s strong evidence that he stands the best chance of beating Trump.
Cue the attacks
On at least two occasions since the turn of the new year, Trump has singled out Sanders for criticism. On 9 January, he attacked him for opposing the assassination of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani. Because Sanders spoke out against this transparent act of political murder and flagrant violation of international law, Trump claimed that he “can’t be trusted to defend American lives”.
Trump also went on the attack with a classic ‘liberal hypocrite’ propaganda line which is a complete and utter fallacy. He described Sanders as a “wealthy, fossil fuel-guzzling millionaire” who “lectures Americans on how to live their lives while doing the exact opposite”.
Sanders reaches pole position in Iowa
This represents quite a change of tack. After all, up until now the strategy of the Trump administration and much of the corporate-owned press has been to simply ignore the Sanders campaign. The change comes as there is growing evidence that Sanders could win the nomination.
Why is Donald Trump attacking our campaign?
Because we are the strongest campaign to defeat him, and he knows it. https://t.co/IoNbIAQu1q
Read on...
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) January 15, 2020
A poll released on 10 January shows that Sanders is now leading the field of contenders in the crucial Iowa primary contest. This small Midwestern state has long been the first to hold a primary for both major US political parties, making its outcome an important bellwether for the primary process as a whole. The poll shows Sanders has the support of 20% of likely voters, with close contender Elizabeth Warren on 17%.
Increasing Democratic tensions
The findings came shortly before the first Democratic primary debate of 2020, which took place on 14 January. For the first time, there were visible divisions between Sanders and Warren. In particular, there was a heated exchange regarding a private conversation between them in which Warren claims Sanders said he ‘didn’t believe a woman could win the presidency’ – something Sanders denies.
On the debate stage, Sanders reiterated his denial, insisting:
Well, as a matter of fact, I didn’t say it… Anybody [who] knows me knows that it’s incomprehensible that I would think that a woman cannot be president of the United States.
He also pointed to the danger of allowing division to be sown between progressives. He said:
I don’t want to waste a whole lot of time on this, because this is what Donald Trump and maybe some of the media want.
History repeating itself
Warren’s attack on Sanders is completely unfair. Because Sanders has one of the strongest records on gender equality issues amongst members of congress. Consequently, it’s also counterproductive, as it cynically weaponizes the serious problem of gender inequality – which is ignored and exacerbated overwhelmingly by the political right – to attack someone who has long been fully aware of the extent of the problem.
And this is not the first time that the gender card has been dealt from the bottom of the deck in order to attack Sanders. During the 2016 Democratic primary, then-candidate Hillary Clinton used the exact same tactic by implying that a large bulk of Sanders supporters were sexist – calling them ‘Bernie bros’. Now, a second primary contest risks getting marred by the weaponisation of sexism allegations.
With an increasingly out-of-control White House led by a sexist bigot with overt fascist tendencies, the stakes are too high for Democrats to get bogged down with infighting – especially when the evidence that Sanders is the best person for the nomination is overwhelming.
Sanders is the best bet to beat Trump
In the aftermath of 2016 presidential election, multiple polls – including one from Fox News – found Sanders to be the most popular politician in the country. There is also strong evidence that, had Sanders won the nomination, he would have beaten Trump. And more recent polls consistently show him as the candidate who fares best against him in most state contests.
The fact that Trump and his backers are now in attack mode, meanwhile, is perhaps the ultimate indicator that Sanders is best placed to defeat him in this year’s election.
Featured image via Flickr – Gage Skidmore and White House
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
So sexism is becoming weaponized the same way “antisemitism” has. This will undermine any genuine struggle for sexual equality, in exactly the same way that weaponizing So called “antisemitism” (ie criticizing Israel) has undermined genuine concerns of antisemitism.
Danger posed to the Republicans by Sanders has little to do with matters of so-called ‘gender’. Those are the concern of a rabble of activists whose narrow interests connect little with the daily worries of ordinary USA folk. Healthcare, societal infrastructure failure (e.g. polluted drinking water), student debt, housing costs, low wages, and the increasingly unattainable ‘American Dream’, tacky though that is, bother ordinary families directly. Also, pervasive corruption in US politics and commerce is insinuating itself into the awareness of people who hitherto regarded it as unpatriotic to question the manner in which their society is organised. The greatest danger posed by Sanders is in making the word ‘socialism’ utterable in political discussion.
That said, Sander’s take on socialism is shallow by historical European standards.