Trump ramps up longstanding Republican efforts to further weaken US democracy

Trump yelling
Peter Bolton

Donald Trump has already used the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic to peddle conspiracy theories and attack political opponents. But now, it seems he’s trying to use the crisis to advance his party’s ongoing campaign of voter suppression – the latest chapter in a long history.


On 20 May, Trump falsely accused the mid-western state of Michigan of sending absentee ballots to voters “illegally and without authorization by a rogue Secretary of State”. Michigan’s secretary of state responded on Twitter that her office had sent out applications, not ballots. She added that at least four states (which, unlike Michigan, have Republican governors) have done the very same thing (and presumably escaped criticism from Trump on purely partisan grounds).

Most controversially, Trump threatened to withhold federal funding unless Michigan reversed the decision. He later made the same threat against the state of Nevada (which also has a Democratic Party state government) – again, presumably on partisan grounds. He claimed that the state was encouraging a “great Voter Fraud scenario” that would somehow allow voters to “cheat in elections”. Such claims are false – research has conclusively debunked the idea that absentee voting significantly impacts levels of electoral fraud.

A long history

The apparent bullying of state governments by a US president is unprecedented in recent US history. Indeed, there has long been a convention, enshrined in the US constitution, that the federal government should remain neutral in affairs that are the responsibility of state governments, including organizing elections.

Republicans pushing back against attempts to make it easier to vote, however, is nothing new. Because for decades, the party has been engaged in a protracted campaign of voter suppression to keep certain kinds of voters away from polling booths. This process has particularly targeted minorities and disproportionately impacted poor people – exactly the kind of people most likely to vote for their (often only marginally more progressive) Democratic Party rivals.


One tactic has been so-called ‘voter ID laws’, which require voters to present photo identification in order to vote. Again, minorities, poor people, and (especially) recent immigrants tend to be disproportionately affected.

Another is ‘gerrymandering‘, where the lines of congressional districts are deliberately drawn to disenfranchise certain voters. Because state legislatures determine district lines, Republican-controlled states sometimes deliberately divide up poorer communities amongst several districts to dilute their electoral strength. Although gerrymandering to disenfranchise voters on ethnic grounds has been ruled unconstitutional, enforcement hasn’t always been forthcoming.


Disenfranchisement of African-Americans, meanwhile, has a particularly long history, especially in the south. During a period known as ‘Jim Crow‘ following the US Civil War, some southern states used tactics such as literacy tests, poll taxes, restrictive and arbitrary registration practices, and even outright violence and fraud to supress the Black vote. Because such blatant methods have become less feasible since the Civil Rights era in the 1960s, right-wing forces have increasingly resorted to more subtle and stealthy forms of voter suppression.

Some states, for example, have used the criminal justice system to permanently disenfranchise citizens with criminal records. This has been done under the guise of promoting ‘law and order’ to deflect charges of overt racism. In some states, people convicted of certain crimes can literally never vote again – even after they have served their sentence and been released. Due to the (very well-documented) structural racism of the US criminal justice system, this disproportionately affects minorities, and especially African-Americans.


What makes this all the more outrageous is the fact that the US presents itself as the world’s pinnacle example, and even upholder and rightful spreader, of representative democracy. Yet in addition to these blemishes on its own record, it also has an extensive history of intervening in other countries’ elections in order to affect the result.

The US clearly has zero credibility when it comes to lecturing others about democracy. And to stop even greater voter suppression in the Trump era, it’s vital that all those who believe in democracy organize and fight back.

Featured image via Flickr – Gage Skidmore 

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. There’s an old joke [1960s] that satarises ethnic voter suppression in the States.

      Black guy goes to walk into polling station in Alabama. Hulking white police officer steps into his path. Says ‘Where ya think you going, boy?” Black guy replies ‘Going in to vote, sir.’ Cop replies ‘We gotta check you can read before you can vote’ and shoves a printed card into his face. The writing is in Greek.’ The black guy stares at it for a moment and the cop goes ‘Can’t read it, can ya, boy. No read, no vote.’ Black guy replies ‘I sure can read it too.’ Cop smirks. ‘Oh yeah. Go on then.’ Black guy – ‘It says “Ain’t no brothers voting in this state today.” ‘

      Actually the original punchline used the n-word, not ‘brothers’. But wouldn’t Trump just love to bring those good old days back.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.