Facebook bans Alex Jones and Milo Yiannopoulos for breaking its rules

A photo of Alex Jones, the Facebook logo, and Milo Yiannopoulos
Support us and go ad-free

Facebook has banned a number of far-right activists and commentators from its platforms for breaking its rules. Alex Jones and Milo Yiannopoulos were two of those whose accounts were banned by the company. Jones has previously claimed the US government faked the Sandy Hook school shooting and that Hillary Clinton is part of a child sex-trafficking ring.

Yiannopoulos has in the past called for “vigilante squads” to attack journalists. More recently he said the Christchurch massacre in New Zealand happened because the government “mollycoddles extremist leftism and barbaric, alien religious cultures”.

Facebook announced the bans on 2 May.

Combatting hate

Facebook said it was banning the accounts because they violated its rules, specifically those relating to “Dangerous Individuals and Organizations”. These rules state that it doesn’t allow individuals or groups who encourage or engage in violence to use its platforms. In a statement it declared:

We’ve always banned individuals or organizations that promote or engage in violence and hate, regardless of ideology.

A welcome change

Media Matters, an NGO which monitors and corrects “conservative misinformation” welcomed the bans. It argued that:

This move by Facebook is a step in the right direction, opening doors to making its platforms safer and inspiring some optimism that the tech company might be capable of taking responsibility for the ways its platforms have empowered extremists.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Facebook said its methods are “extensive” which is why the bans took place.

Previous problems

But Media Matters asserted that there is more Facebook could do. This includes increasing human moderation of rules. It also argued that Facebook “should limit the visibility of content” whose traffic comes from “toxic sources”.

The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) has previously criticised Facebook for its lack of proper moderation. Similarly, as reported by the Irish Times, a number of violent videos remained on Facebook even after they had been reported by users and assessed by moderators.

And last year, a member of the Irish parliament insisted that left unregulated, social media, in general, is a “very real threat to western democracy”.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons – Michael Zimmermann/ Pixabay – aliuyargraphics/ Flickr – NEXT Conference

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. The real reason it has banned these sites is that it is setting a precedent for banning content. Some on the left will welcome this but it will be left wing sites that will be banned next, possibly the Canary, and I would be the first to say “I told you so” but will probably be banned, Censor not lest ye be Censored.

    2. Totally agree with frank_freeman, the power to censor public debate is a double edged sword and should not be wielded by any corporate entity.
      First they came for ………………… and I did not speak out for I was not a…………..
      Then they came for…………………and I did not speak out for I was not a……………
      Then they came for…………………and I did not speak out for I was not a……………
      Then they came for me…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
      If your opinions are not within the MSC’s acceptable range they will be coming for you too.

    3. Milo Yiannopoulos is just a showman. Yes, he’s provocative with his verboticisms that wind people up. He’s got it to a ‘T’ crafting his Q & As on his circuit talks. He’s raking it in. He’s an entrepreneur dressed like a clown. What’s to be concerned about? Facebook’s banning of him plays into Milo and his ilk to be sought after elsewhere if they can’t be got at through the usual common online channels. He’s rampant on YouTube still – and very entertainingly so. His latest is to sing about Jesus. Seriously. You can tell he’s rather a vulnerable chappy with a few personal sorrows to be excised. Perhaps, he has indeed found Jesus at last to help him. Ah! He’s quite sweet really.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.