Facebook bans Alex Jones and Milo Yiannopoulos for breaking its rules
Facebook has banned a number of far-right activists and commentators from its platforms for breaking its rules. Alex Jones and Milo Yiannopoulos were two of those whose accounts were banned by the company. Jones has previously claimed the US government faked the Sandy Hook school shooting and that Hillary Clinton is part of a child sex-trafficking ring.
Yiannopoulos has in the past called for “vigilante squads” to attack journalists. More recently he said the Christchurch massacre in New Zealand happened because the government “mollycoddles extremist leftism and barbaric, alien religious cultures”.
Facebook announced the bans on 2 May.
Combatting hate
Facebook said it was banning the accounts because they violated its rules, specifically those relating to “Dangerous Individuals and Organizations”. These rules state that it doesn’t allow individuals or groups who encourage or engage in violence to use its platforms. In a statement it declared:
We’ve always banned individuals or organizations that promote or engage in violence and hate, regardless of ideology.
A welcome change
Media Matters, an NGO which monitors and corrects “conservative misinformation” welcomed the bans. It argued that:
This move by Facebook is a step in the right direction, opening doors to making its platforms safer and inspiring some optimism that the tech company might be capable of taking responsibility for the ways its platforms have empowered extremists.
Read on...
Facebook said its methods are “extensive” which is why the bans took place.
Previous problems
But Media Matters asserted that there is more Facebook could do. This includes increasing human moderation of rules. It also argued that Facebook “should limit the visibility of content” whose traffic comes from “toxic sources”.
The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) has previously criticised Facebook for its lack of proper moderation. Similarly, as reported by the Irish Times, a number of violent videos remained on Facebook even after they had been reported by users and assessed by moderators.
And last year, a member of the Irish parliament insisted that left unregulated, social media, in general, is a “very real threat to western democracy”.
Featured image via Wikimedia Commons – Michael Zimmermann/ Pixabay – aliuyargraphics/ Flickr – NEXT Conference
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
.jpg){kind=link}
The real reason it has banned these sites is that it is setting a precedent for banning content. Some on the left will welcome this but it will be left wing sites that will be banned next, possibly the Canary, and I would be the first to say “I told you so” but will probably be banned, Censor not lest ye be Censored.
Totally agree with frank_freeman, the power to censor public debate is a double edged sword and should not be wielded by any corporate entity.
First they came for ………………… and I did not speak out for I was not a…………..
Then they came for…………………and I did not speak out for I was not a……………
Then they came for…………………and I did not speak out for I was not a……………
Then they came for me…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
If your opinions are not within the MSC’s acceptable range they will be coming for you too.
Milo Yiannopoulos is just a showman. Yes, he’s provocative with his verboticisms that wind people up. He’s got it to a ‘T’ crafting his Q & As on his circuit talks. He’s raking it in. He’s an entrepreneur dressed like a clown. What’s to be concerned about? Facebook’s banning of him plays into Milo and his ilk to be sought after elsewhere if they can’t be got at through the usual common online channels. He’s rampant on YouTube still – and very entertainingly so. His latest is to sing about Jesus. Seriously. You can tell he’s rather a vulnerable chappy with a few personal sorrows to be excised. Perhaps, he has indeed found Jesus at last to help him. Ah! He’s quite sweet really.