Facebook this week: a global outage and a sickening scandal

A picture of the Facebook logo and Mark Zuckerberg
Support us and go ad-free

A whistleblower testified before the US Senate on 5 October that she believes Facebook puts profit above safety.

As Facebook reels from the chaos of its large outage on 4 October, former Facebook employee Frances Haugen has taken her allegations about the social media giant before senators. Haugen, who revealed herself as the Facebook whistleblower on Sunday 3 October, has accused Facebook of several safety violations in at least eight complaints.

“Astronomical profits before people”

The complaints, originally published anonymously with the Wall Street Journal, cover a range of issues that include how Facebook’s algorithm monitors hate speech, mental health of teenagers, and human trafficking monitoring. In the WSJ reports, Haugen said the company was aware of how its products could cause harm but had not made sufficient changes – in some instances ignoring issues entirely.

Her complaints come from internal documents Haugen copied before leaving the company, which number in the tens of thousands.

In her opening statement to senators on 5 October, Haugen said:

I’m here today because I believe Facebook’s products harm children, stoke division and weaken our democracy. The company’s leadership knows how to make Facebook and Instagram safer, but won’t make the necessary changes because they have put their astronomical profits before people.

The allegations

Haugen’s most recent allegation says that Facebook relaxed its misinformation standards shortly before the 6 January Capitol riots.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

In terms of mental health, she told senators that Facebook has conducted its own studies that show adolescents can easily be taken from innocent content to content promoting anorexia by the company’s algorithms. One study from the leaked documents found that 30% of teenage girls said Instagram was making them feel worse about their bodies.

She also said that Facebook has misled investors and politicians about how it has tackled harmful content.

Facebook has previously faced numerous allegations and questions about its algorithm, which prioritises engagement – this can often be “inflammatory or political content” according to the Guardian.

Calling for regulation

In her testimony, Haugen called for regulation of Facebook – a call echoed by many of the social media company’s critics. However, she added that currently it’s impossible for regulators to make meaningful change at Facebook because of the secrecy surrounding the workings of its algorithms.

With Mark Zuckerberg owning over 55% of the company’s voting shares, Haugen said:

There is nobody currently holding Zuckerberg accountable but himself.

Senator Ed Markey echoed her calls as he promoted his new act to impose more controls on how social media companies collect the data of children and promote ‘toxic’ content with algorithms.

He said:

Here’s my message for Mark Zuckerberg: your time of invading our privacy, promoting toxic content in preying on children and teens is over. Congress will be taking action. We will not allow your company to harm our children and our families and our democracy, any longer.

Facebook’s response

A statement published by Facebook’s vice president of global affairs Nick Clegg on 18 September claimed that the allegations in the WSJ contained “deliberate mischaracterizations” and “conferred egregiously false motives” on Facebook.

He wrote:

At the heart of this series is an allegation that is just plain false: that Facebook conducts research and then systematically and willfully ignores it if the findings are inconvenient for the company. This impugns the motives and hard work of thousands of researchers, policy experts and engineers at Facebook who strive to improve the quality of our products, and to understand their wider (positive and negative) impact.

It’s a claim which could only be made by cherry-picking selective quotes from individual pieces of leaked material in a way that presents complex and nuanced issues as if there is only ever one right answer.

A different kind of scandal?

While Facebook has gone through its fair share of image problems and allegations, some experts are saying this time feels different. Former Facebook public policy director Katie Harbath told Vox:

This is the first time I can remember anything this dramatic, with an anonymous whistleblower, this many documents, and a big reveal.

This was before Haugen revealed her identity, but still marked one of the few times a Facebook employee had gone properly on the record about the company. No previous whistleblower has had as much evidence or press attention.

Former Facebook head of global elections integrity operations Yaël Eisenstat told Vox: 

It is a big moment. For years, we’ve known many of these issues — via journalists and researchers — but Facebook has been able to claim that they have an ax to grind and so we shouldn’t trust what they say. This time, the documents speak for themselves.

Featured image via Flickr/Anthony Quintano

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. It’s the people who keeps using it! There are plenty of alternatives but you try getting people to switch to Signal, Mastodon, Diaspora, etc, etc!
      If we keep using it and Amazon, Google, etc we have nothing to complain over, because we actually pay for their $Billions and unsafe low paid working conditions, for their staff!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.