This is the latest in The Canary’s series of on-the-ground articles from Venezuela.
On 23 February, the US attempted to force ‘humanitarian aid’ trucks into Táchira, Venezuela’s border state with Colombia. As the situation devolved into chaos, senior US officials tweeted excitedly about possible military defections and a violent border confrontation.
But by 25 February, it was clear that Washington’s objectives had failed. The Venezuelan military remained loyal, and Nicolás Maduro was still president. Two weeks later, the US suffered another critical propaganda blow when the New York Times reported that Colombians – and not Venezuelan officials – were likely responsible for burning the ‘aid’ trucks.
The Canary spoke with experts on Táchira and first-hand witnesses of events at the border between 23 and 25 February. They provided key context and testimonies about Washington’s humanitarian warmongering.
Táchira and Cúcuta
The Colombian-Venezuelan border stretches some 2,000km – part of which lies between Táchira and the Colombian city of Cúcuta.
Cúcuta is known as “Colombia’s contraband city”; smugglers regularly bring beef, gasoline, and various other products across the border. The city also has a high presence of paramilitaries, which have longstanding links with the Colombian armed forces and are responsible for extreme political repression in Colombia.
The Canary spoke with Ricardo Pérez and Marco Teruggi about the strategic importance of Táchira. Pérez formerly worked in Táchira’s mayoral office, and Teruggi is a sociologist and journalist with wide experience covering the Colombian-Venezuelan border.
Pérez began by saying:
It’s likely that Táchira was a strategic location for trying to enter with the ‘humanitarian aid’ trucks. There’s a lot of organised crime and Colombian paramilitary presence in this area. There are all sorts of criminal elements there because so much money and goods are always crossing the border; there are various high-rise blocks in Táchira that are paid for with laundered money.
The Colombian paramilitary forces have infiltrated Venezuela on numerous occasions; and this is the area with the strongest paramilitary presence in Colombia. There are also Mexican drug cartels there, close to Cúcuta.
But the question is: what was the objective? If we can determine Washington’s objective, we can better understand their strategy.
Was the objective to enter into Venezuela, stay there for a few hours, and show some symbolic force? Was the objective to achieve military defections? There were also 200 mercenaries on the Colombian side that, in the end, weren’t activated.
Ultimately, I think, there were numerous plans; and they didn’t work out. That day showed the US the real balance of power between the Guaidó block and the pro-government block.
Jaskeherry Rivas, leader of the ‘Guardians of the Liberator’ social organisation (colectivo)
Many Venezuelans travelled to Táchira to defend their national sovereignty. The Canary asked Rivas about why he travelled to Táchira:
Our colectivo went to Táchira on the 22 February. We went to confront paid, violent opposition groups – ‘guarimberos’ – who were assisting an incursion onto our territory without authorisation, with a false narrative of ‘humanitarian aid’. We, as a country, prepared the conditions to defend our country; to defend our territory above all.
Unlike the guarimberos, we weren’t paid. We went out of conscientiousness to defend our territory – come what may.
We went to contain an attempt to create a false-positive attack on our country. We were on the bridge, but we let our military authorities do their job.
Rivas continued by speaking about what he saw:
The first thing we became aware of was the ‘aid’ concert going on across the border. They were raising funds for the supposed aid. Where did the funds go? We don’t know; they certainly haven’t been used for aid, anyway.
The Canary asked Rivas if he was worried war might break out:
No. We’ve been at war for 20 years – since Hugo Chávez was elected. We’re not afraid of the US empire; we’re not scared of guarimberos. We were happy to defend our territory.
Anael Ruiz, International Relations Commission, Youth Mission
Anael Ruiz also spoke about fears that war might break out, saying:
They were scared because we weren’t scared! In fact, my mom was scared. She rang me from home to tell me: ‘Something’s going on at the border’. I had to tell her slowly: ‘Mom, I’m at the border’.
At one point, we heard gunshots – and the main concern was that paramilitaries might be attacking our armed forces. Any kind of provocation, we knew, might lead to a real conflict.
But later, we saw our Venezuelan general speaking to the Colombian officers. We couldn’t hear what they were saying, but it was pretty clear from the context that they were telling them that diplomatic ties were broken; that Venezuela wouldn’t allow an incursion onto our territory. The conversation was calm; our general seemed composed. So we weren’t worried.
After, when the Venezuelan guard were walking home, people were supporting them – clapping them on the street. Someone was shouting what Chávez once said: ‘Bastantes cojones hay aquí!’ (Here, we have lots of courage!).
#VIDEO ¡Así reciben en el puente Las Tienditas en el estado Táchira #Venezuela a los efectivos de la Guardia Nacional Bolivariana que durante el día estuvieron resistiendo en el puente Simón Bolívar, defendiendo la soberanía de Venezuela! #LealesSiempreTraidoresNunca pic.twitter.com/LTnCi7j6ph
— Luigino Bracci Roa (@lubrio) February 24, 2019
Both Washington’s Plan A (recognising Guaidó as Venezuela’s ‘leader’) and Plan B (trying to force ‘humanitarian aid’ onto Venezuelan territory) have failed to topple the Venezuelan government. Plan C, it seems, will be slow, punishing economic warfare. But many Venezuelans are resisting Washington’s boot on that front too.
Featured image via Anael Ruiz
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?