Anti-ISIS fighters in Syria are being tortured by Turkish-led invasion forces [VIDEO]

The Canary has previously reported on Turkey’s invasion of Syria on 24 August, and on how this attack wasn’t aimed at Daesh (Isis/Isil) but at the very people who have been most effectively pushing the jihadi group back in recent months and years. And now, Turkish-backed fighters in northern Syria have apparently been caught torturing these anti-Daesh fighters.

Turkish-backed militias doing Daesh’s dirty work

The forces backed by Turkey in northern Syria call themselves the Free Syrian Army (FSA). They consist of ultra-nationalist Turkmen fighters allied with former al-Qaeda affiliate Jabhat Fateh al-Sham and fellow Salafi/Wahhabi group Ahrar al-Sham. They also consist of fighters from the Nour al-Din al-Zenki battalion and a number also have links to the Grey Wolves – a notorious neo-fascist group in Turkey. There are also reports of Daesh soldiers swapping uniforms and joining the ‘FSA’ as the Turkish military advances further into Syrian territory.

Plans by some Turkmen fighters to back a Turkish invasion of Syria were first conceived as far back as August 2015. And evidence of collusion between Turkey and Daesh has been nothing short of comprehensive in the past. All this considered, it came as no surprise when shocking images were posted on social media showing fighters from the multi-ethnic but Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) being tortured by FSA units.

Syrian news outlet Al-Masdar backed up these claims with a video showing what happened to the SDF soldiers after they had been taken from Jarablus to the jihadists’ stronghold in northern Aleppo.

A video also shows the Turkish-backed forces clearly attacking Kurdish-led YPG/J militias (a key part of the SDF).

Read on...

The US, which has been advising the SDF in recent months and supporting its advances against Daesh from the air, is now backing the Turkish invasion. It deployed F-16 and A-10 “tankbuster” jets in support of Turkish forces (though Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan may not have fully briefed Washington on his plans to attack the SDF).

After taking the northern Syrian city of Jarablus from Daesh (which had apparently been allowed to leave ahead of the invasion), the Turkish military shelled several SDF-held positions in places like the recently liberated city of Manbij. Turkish armoured vehicles later entered the YPG/J-held area of Kobane (four soon came under attack from the local populace), with the apparent aim of building a border wall between Turkish and Syrian territory.

Civilians in Kobani forming human shield against Turkish advance

The SDF also came under attack in Hasakah (Hesîçe) from the Syrian airforce.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights has confirmed that, only one day after the invasion by Turkey, at least 20 civilians had been killed and 50 others wounded by Turkish artillery and airstrikes at Jeb el-Kussa, near Jarabulus.

Preventing the creation of a state? Or preventing self-government?

While SDF-held areas in northern Syria have consistently stressed that they do not plan to create a state (they instead insist on democratic autonomy within Syria), Turkey says it plans to stay in Syria until alleged plans to “form a state” are crushed. It also plans to create a ‘safe zone‘ to prevent a link-up between the different SDF-held areas. This zone would likely be controlled by the same Turkish-backed groups described earlier in this article.

Suat Kiniklioglu, executive director of Ankara-based thinktank the Center for Strategic Communication, has said:

Turkish public opinion is sensitive to a situation whereby a Kurdish entity is in command of Turkey’s southern borders. The safe zone — if successfully created — would de facto break the continuity of a future Kurdish entity there.

SDF forces are now under attack from all sides, but continue to resist. The US, meanwhile, is likely to back Turkey – its NATO ally – regardless of the potentially devastating consequences of its anti-SDF assault.

Get Involved!

– Read The Canary‘s previous articles on Rojava and see more international reporting from us at The Canary Global.

– Donate to the Rojava Plan (to support the system of self-government in place in northern Syria).

Support The Canary as we seek to amplify the voices of oppressed people around the world.

Feature image via sergermed/Twitter

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed