The link between a UK activist, Wikileaks, and US mass surveillance (Part 3) [VIDEO]

Lauri Love
Support us and go ad-free

British computer scientist and activist Lauri Love faces the possibility of life in a US jail. He has had multiple charges thrown at him just as American IT genius Aaron Swartz faced before ending his own life in 2013, as described previously at The Canary. But there was one more dimension to the ‘persecution’ Swartz suffered which the mainstream media has failed to highlight.

What was Swartz doing?

There is evidence that Swartz had been conducting investigations prior to his death that may have seriously worried American authorities. Given his particular skills, he could have come across a new global surveillance system that was being developed literally under his nose. And this may have been a key reason for the Secret Service being assigned to his case.

Aaron Swartz was not just a talented digital campaigner. He also played a crucial role in defeating the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). This defeat was a major blow to government legislation policy in the US.

Perhaps more significantly, Swartz had been conducting investigations into what had been happening to Chelsea (formerly Bradley) Manning during her incarceration at the Quantico Brig. He had also been researching Manning’s prosecution.

The authorities were fully aware of these extracurricular interests, thanks to the freedom of information (FOI) requests that Swartz had made. And from the authorities’ point of view, such interests from a person like Swartz, with his much-lauded investigative skills, might have proven a threat to Manning’s successful prosecution, which at that point in time was coming to a close.

On January 19, 2013, in a dramatic series of tweets, Wikileaks added to the speculation:

But that was not all

There was also another dimension that could explain why the Secret Service became involved in Swartz’s prosecution.

In the lead-up to Swartz’s arrest, the Lincoln Laboratory at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) had been partnering with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on a secret project involving the development of mass surveillance technology. It was imperative that the project remained under wraps until it was officially launched in March 2011, and that the blueprints for its design were not discovered or revealed.

The product that was being developed was a new state-of-the-art surveillance camera that could be positioned in any part of the world and accessed by intelligence gatherers. The name of the project was the Imaging System for Immersive Surveillance (ISIS). Given its specifications, ISIS could well have been the companion hardware technology to the infamous Trapwire.

Trapwire was first revealed via Stratfor-hacked emails by Jeremy Hammond, then published by Wikileaks. Trapwire was subsequently investigated by Barrett Brown via his Project PM website, as well as by a handful of bloggers. Anonymous subsequently launched a global campaign against Trapwire.

According to one report, Trapwire was developed with DHS funding – the same government department that funded ISIS.

The prototype Trapwire was the brainchild of Abraxas Applications (formerly Abraxas Corporation) which was staffed by former agents from the Pentagon, the CIA and other government entities.

There had been circumstantial evidence that Abraxas Applications was ultimately owned by Cubic Corporation, which also manages transit systems and anonymising facilities used by journalists and human rights activists. Cubic strenuously denied ownership, but in the end Russia Today was able to demonstrate that Cubic was the ultimate owner. Cubic also designed, developed and installed the Oyster Card system for London’s Underground and buses. The implication was that such a surveillance system was linked to millions of emails and peoples’ everyday movements.

Examining ISIS

Conventional surveillance systems generally use cameras with individual pan/tilt/zoom mechanisms, meaning they either provide a wide field of view at low resolution – which makes it difficult or impossible to identify individuals, or a narrow field of view at high resolution, which in turn means that situational awareness outside the field of view is lost. Worse, the spatial resolution of images acquired by conventional surveillance systems varies with the distance to the target and the particular optical arrangement of the cameras. Thus, not all imagery collected by conventional surveillance systems is suitable for target tracking, pattern (face) recognition, etc.

But ISIS, according to a DHS report, solved all those problems and could help revolutionise surveillance.

Whether ISIS was linked to the Trapwire project is down to speculation. But even if it wasn’t, ISIS would still have been considered a top secret project, not to be exposed. Perhaps this may explain why the prosecution of Swartz involved so many security specialists.

Back to Lauri Love

Many people believe that Aaron Swartz was a victim of prosecutional overkill, and was at the time suffering from depression. Likewise, it is feared that Lauri Love, who similarly suffers from depression, may also (as he has already intimated) commit suicide rather than face the ordeal of a trial in the US.

It is therefore timely that the motivations behind the prosecution of Swartz – which provoked the subsequent attack by Anonymous – be re-examined, if only to fully explain why Swartz was ‘persecuted’, and to explain why the same is now happening with Love.

Perhaps the final words on this matter are best given by Lauri Love himself – with some help from Aaron Swartz:

Get Involved!

– Donate to the funds supporting Lauri Love:

– Sign a petition to Home Secretary Amber Rudd, requesting extradition proceedings against Lauri Love be halted.

Featured image via YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed