Brief respite for Julian Assange, but a far greater threat now awaits him [VIDEO]

Julian Assange
Support us and go ad-free

On 19 May 2017, Swedish prosecutor Marianne Ny announced the end of a preliminary investigation into an allegation of rape against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. But Assange is staying exactly where he is. At least until he receives assurances that he won’t be extradited to the US if leaves the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

Assange’s fears are entirely valid. Not only is there a sealed indictment ready for his prosecution, but senior US officials are actively examining specific charges. The Metropolitan Police, meanwhile, have issued a statement saying that Assange would be arrested for skipping bail if he left the embassy. And it is entirely feasible that, once Assange is held by the British police, a US arrest warrant and extradition order could be issued.

Charges examined

US authorities are reportedly preparing charges against Assange. These charges could include conspiracy, theft of government property, or violating the Espionage Act. Regarding the latter, CIA Director Mike Pompeo explained that WikiLeaks had allegedly “directed Chelsea Manning to intercept specific secret information, and it overwhelmingly focuses on the United States”.

A clue to how Pompeo would effect a prosecution was provided when he told the Center for Strategic and International Studies that:

It is time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is: a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors, like Russia.

Pompeo also added that, as Assange is not a US citizen, he “has no First Amendment freedoms”.

And now, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions has declared that Assange’s arrest is a “priority”. Indeed, he stated:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

We’ve already begun to step up our efforts and whenever a case can be made, we will seek to put some people in jail.

Assange prosecution trail uncovered

In fact, the US ‘efforts’ to make a case against Assange began some nine years back.

In 2010, WikiLeaks published a March 2008 US Army Counterintelligence Centre report, marked ‘Secret’, as U.S. Intelligence planned to destroy WikiLeaks.

The report recommends [pdf, p1]:

The identification, exposure, termination of employment, criminal prosecution, legal action against current or former insiders, leakers, or whistlblowers [sic] could potentially damage or destroy this center of gravity and deter others considering similar actions from using the Wikileaks.org Web site.

Subsequently, a hacked email dated 26 January 2011 from Sean Noonan (of private intelligence agency Stratfor) provided confirmation that prosecution of Assange was underway. The email was headed “Not for Pub — We have a sealed indictment on Assange. Pls protect”. Stratfor’s Fred Burton also proposed that Assange should be waterboarded.

That sealed indictment was referenced [pdf] in a classified US cable, dated June 2012, about Chelsea (then Bradley) Manning to the Department of Foreign Affairs & Trade, Australia.

The cable states [pdf p8]:

Concurrently, District Court Judge Liam O’Grady of the Eastern District of Virginia (where reportedly a WikiLeaks Grand Jury has been convened) denied a motion to unseal documents because doing so ‘at this time would damage an ongoing criminal investigation’.

On pages 10 and 11 [pdf] a facsimile from the WikiLeaks Grand Jury refers to a decision to delay the unsealing of the indictment.

Australian government in the loop

Another government document from Australia states [pdf]:

  • “US officials have announced publicly that an investigation into Wikileaks has been underway” – (p14)
  • “On 29 November 2010 the US Attorney-General, Holder, said that there was an active ongoing criminal investigation with regard to this matter [the Wikileaks affair]” – (p17)
  • “The US investigation into possible criminal conduct by Mr Assange has been proceeding for more than a year” – (p39)

And the most likely charge?

In a 2013 affidavit, Assange stated:

In Alexandria, Virginia, a Grand Jury has been empanelled for the past three years to explore ways to prosecute WikiLeaks for its publishing work. It has identified seven civilians, including the ‘founders, owners or managers of WikiLeaks’. The Grand Jury’s case number is 10GJ3793.

The late Michael Ratner, Assange’s US lawyer, was certain about the most likely charge:

[T]he Grand Jury’s number is 10, standing for the year it began, GJ which is Grand Jury and then 3793. Three is the Conspiracy Statute in the United States. 793 is the Espionage Statute. So what they’re investigating is 3793: conspiracy to commit espionage.

It is unlikely that British authorities would refuse to co-operate with the US authorities in extraditing Assange. But such a move would be challenged in the British courts. There’s also a possibility that Assange could be tried in absentia.

In short, there may well be much more drama to come – and very soon. Unless, of course, Assange has an ace card up his sleeve in the form of sensitive information that could embarrass US authorities further.

Get Involved!

Read up on the latest from WikiLeaks.

– Donate to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Featured image via Flickr Creative Commons

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed