The evidence the UK media is ignoring after the chemical attack in Syria

May and Assad
Support us and go ad-free

Theresa May has suggested that Syria’s Bashar al-Assad is probably behind the alleged chemical attack in Douma. And the majority of the corporate media seems to be toeing the Conservative government line.

Meanwhile, Jeremy Corbyn is waiting until the attack is investigated before jumping to conclusions. And there is evidence suggesting that exercising caution before blaming a foreign state may be a good idea.

1) Syrian opposition forces may have chemical weapons

Dozens of people have reportedly died in Douma’s chemical weapons attack.

Saudi-backed opposition group Jaish al-Islam (or ‘Army of Islam’) controlled the city until a deal announced on 8 April.

In Aleppo in April 2016, Jaish al-Islam was the main group involved in fighting against Kurdish-led forces. At the time, Kurdish health officials reported that troops were experiencing symptoms consistent with exposure to chlorine gases. And Jaish al-Islam later released a statement saying:

One of our commanders has unlawfully used a type of weapon that is not included in our list

But it is not just chlorine gases that may be in the hands of rebel groups. In 2013, a UN commission into human rights abuses in Syria suspected that anti-Assad groups had used nerve agent sarin.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Commentators have suggested the chemical weapon used in the recent attack could be sarin or chlorine gas.

2) Assad regime was on the verge of victory in the area anyway

As Sky News has reported:

An offensive that began in February has seen the Syrian government recapture nearly all of eastern Ghouta from rebels, leaving just Douma in the hands of insurgent group Jaish al Islam.

Jaish al-Islam is now evacuating Douma after reaching a deal with Russia. The Assad regime is about to reclaim the last of eastern Ghouta. This has led critics, such as former UK ambassador to Syria Peter Ford, to question why Assad would bring international condemnation on himself right before victory.

3) The sources are linked to the anti-Assad opposition

The Western media’s sources are opposed to the Syrian government. The White Helmets medical group has informed a lot of the media’s coverage on the chemical attack. But the group is also linked to the opposition in war-torn Syria.

Meanwhile, former US secretary of state John Kerry once suggested that Jaish al-Islam was a ‘subgroup’ of Daesh (Isis/Isil). Other US officials spoke against Kerry’s assertion.

Given reports from Amnesty International, however, Jaish al-Islam does not seem to be a ‘moderate’ group:

non-state armed groups, particularly the Army of Islam, are guilty of an array of abuses including abductions, arbitrary detentions and indiscriminate shelling. Their use of imprecise weapons such as mortars and Grad rockets in populated areas amounts to war crimes.


It’s unclear what motive Assad would have for using chemical weapons at this stage. But that doesn’t mean the Syrian government didn’t do it. The point is that we don’t know.

Again, it looks like Corbyn is correct to hold off before jumping to conclusions.

Get Involved!

– Write to Theresa May and your MP to demand an evidence-based foreign policy.

Featured image via UK Home Office and WikiCommons

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed