Luke Akehurst is a former member of Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC), and a “proud” supporter of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Although not Jewish himself, Akehurst is the director of We Believe in Israel (WBI). The group describes him as having been “a committed Zionist all his life”. And it’s in this role that he’s spoken out about the recent massacre of Palestinians by Israeli troops.
made me sceptical they would shoot anyone who didn’t present a threat. The whole point of deploying snipers is that their fire is precisely targeted and the opposite of indiscriminate.
This certainly sounds logical, but it’s at odds with Israel’s record. Especially as a recent video showed an Israeli sniper celebrating after they shot an unarmed Palestinian. At the time, the Israeli defence minister said the sniper “deserves a medal”.
This does not authorize the Israeli army to slaughter them. Did anyone of them carry a weapon or endanger a soldier?
The figure is also at odds with an earlier report from Israeli security forces which claimed at least 24 were activists – a lower figure that doesn’t suggest ‘precise targeting’.
when we talk about ‘peaceful resistance,’ we are deceiving the public. This is a peaceful resistance bolstered by a military force and by security agencies, and enjoying tremendous popular support.
Hamas is not the only group in Palestine, however. Fatah is its opposing party, and al-Zahar said of them in the same interview:
As for (Fatah’s) ‘peaceful resistance,’ it consists of rallies, demonstrations, protests, pleas and requests in order to improve the terms of the negotiations, or to enable talks with the Israeli enemy. This deception does not fool the Palestinian public.
Hamas had played a key role in planning the recent protests since Trump controversially announced plans to open a US embassy in Jerusalem. The events were also commemorating the 70th anniversary of the ‘Nakba’ (when “tens of thousands” of Palestinians “were expelled from their homes in 1948”).
This wasn’t the indiscriminate massacre of civilians presented to the world on Monday. This was a case of highly trained IDF soldiers, with very clear rules of engagement
But even if Israeli forces had identified its victims as Hamas activists, that doesn’t mean the shooting was legal. Prominent Israeli human rights lawyer Michael Sfard said [paywall]:
The state and army argue that the use of potentially lethal force against unarmed civilians is permitted even in circumstances where they do not impose an imminent danger to the lives of others.
It seems to me that the huge number of casualties we have seen in recent weeks is a direct result of this legal thesis, which is completely baseless. It contradicts the most fundamental principles of laws governing the use of force, which adhere to the formula that endangering the lives of civilians can only be done to defend life – and nothing else.
Sfard, and other human rights organisations, believe the Israeli army’s rules of engagement violate international law. These rules are currently classified, but Sfard and others are pushing to change that.
In short, it’s unclear if Israel followed its own rules of engagement – because those rules are unknown. But what is clear is that it has been accused of breaking international law, and it’s facing a possible UN investigation.
It also looks like Akehurst, an apologist for the illegal and disastrous invasion of Iraq, is now practising another type of apologism – one that involves defending a regime widely condemned for massacring protesters.
– Join and support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. This is a non-violent means of resisting Israel’s occupation.
– You can also join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?