On 1 November, Brazil’s far-right president-in-waiting Jair Bolsonaro appointed controversial judge Sérgio Moro to serve in his cabinet. And this act essentially signaled the start of Bolsonaro’s campaign to crush the Brazilian left.
An assault on the left
Bolsonaro won the presidency on 28 October in the second round of voting. He defeated the centre-left Workers’ Party (PT), which had held the presidency from 2003 until the controversial removal of Dilma Rousseff in 2016.
We’re going to execute the Workers’ Party members here.
Appointing the man who jailed Brazil’s most popular left-wing leader
Moro will reportedly head a “super ministry”, which will combine the justice and public security portfolios into one ministerial position. He rose to fame while serving as the judge in the highly controversial trial of former president Luiz Inácio ‘Lula’ da Silva, who was the PT’s original candidate to fight this year’s election. Polls overwhelmingly projected him to win. But the Moro-led court convicted him in alleged connection with a large, region-wide corruption scandal known as ‘Operation Car Wash’. It sentenced him to 12 years in prison, which made him ineligible to run for the presidency.
Many Brazilian and international commentators argued that the proceedings against Lula were heavily biased, politically motivated, and tainted with foul play. Under Moro’s instructions, for example, the court subjected Lula’s defense team to intimidation and phone tapping. Moro even leaked some of the recordings to the prosecution and the press. The court also based its entire case against Lula on the testimony of just one person – a convicted criminal who stood to gain from the affair. Prosecutors coaxed him with the prospect of a reduced sentence in exchange for his testimony.
Leading UK human rights barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC likened Moro’s behavior during the trial to the Spanish Inquisition. He said:
The grand inquisitor [Moro] organizes, supervises the searches and procedures and arrests, forms his or her own opinions and then judges
Moro’s appointment to Bolsonaro’s cabinet has confirmed the suspicions of critics of Brazil’s justice system that the case against Lula was indeed politically motivated ‘lawfare’.
And it’s not the first time Brazil’s elites have targeted the left with dubious tactics, either. Because in 2016, Brazil’s politicians (almost half of whom would be investigated in relation to ‘Operation Car Wash’) ousted Lula’s successor, Dilma Rousseff, in what supporters have described as a “soft coup“. The case wasn’t about corruption accusations, but about technical budgetary irregularities. A leaked recording later showed that the ouster was a calculated move on the part of political opponents to prevent investigations into their own actions.
Growing political violence
Moro’s appointment comes at a time when Brazil’s press has already reported multiple acts of political violence against social activists, journalists, and members of the LGBTQ+ community. Bolsonaro’s critics call him a fascist, and he has a long record of implicitly lending legitimacy to such acts of violence. He has made numerous homophobic, sexist, and racist remarks; praised Brazil’s murderous military dictatorship; and even indicated support for torture. Shortly before the election, a manifesto from Noam Chomsky and other intellectuals and activists described Bolsonaro as a “fascist, racist, chauvinist and homophobic candidate, one who calls for violence and armed repression”.
For grassroots social movements in Brazil, Moro’s appointment provides one more reason to assertively resist Bolsonaro’s agenda through the mass mobilization of people power.
Featured image via Marcelo Camargo/Wikimedia Commons
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?