Nuclear war edges closer as Trump blows up historic treaty
On 8 December 1987, US president Ronald Reagan and Soviet general secretary Mikhail Gorbachev signed a historic agreement to eliminate a wide range of intermediate-range nuclear and conventional missiles. The ban applied to the US and 12 former Soviet republics, including Russia. It was ratified by the US senate in 1988 by 93 votes to 5.
Current US president Donald Trump aired intentions to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty over 30 years later, in October 2018. And on 1 February 2019, he made these intentions official policy.
The Trump administration is accusing Russia of violating the terms of the INF Treaty. Russia has accused the US of the same.
An official White House statement read:
For far too long, Russia has violated the… INF Treaty with impunity, covertly developing and fielding a prohibited missile system that poses a direct threat to our allies and troops abroad.
Tomorrow, the United States will suspend its obligations under the INF Treaty and begin the process of withdrawing from the INF Treaty… We will move forward with developing our own military response options and will work with NATO and other allies and partners to deny Russia any military advantage from its unlawful conduct.
The New York Times reported that US secretary of state Mike Pompeo added:
Russia has jeopardized the United States’ security interests, and we can no longer be restricted by the treaty while Russia shamelessly violates it.
While Trump claims that Russia’s actions pose “a direct threat to our allies and troops abroad”, many worry that Washington’s actions will initiate a global nuclear arms race.
As Washington’s withdrawal became increasingly likely, Democratic senators including Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren introduced the Prevention of Arms Race Act of 2019.
The act’s goal is:
To prevent a nuclear arms race resulting from weakened international restrictions on the proliferation of intermediate- and shorter-range missiles, and for other purposes.
It highlighted that Washington has not yet exhausted all options to force Russia to comply with the treaty, and continued:
The United States withdrawal from the INF Treaty would allow the Russian Federation to escape international criticism for its violation of the Treaty… [and] free the Russian Federation to expand deployment of the SSC-8 missile system.
Other groups have also slammed the move. Global Zero, for example, is an international organisation which seeks a world without nuclear weapons. And its executive director Derek Johnson said:
Flipping over the negotiating table and storming out of the room may have worked in real estate, but when you’re dealing with nuclear treaties, the risk of misplaying your hand isn’t a failed business venture—it’s an arms race and possibly nuclear war.
A good day for weapons manufacturers
The latest announcement comes a day after Trump rejected his own intelligence officials‘ assessment of Iran’s nuclear capability. On nuclear policy, Trump seems to be progressively less reliable. And his misjudgements consistently favour the spread of nuclear weapons.
According to Beatrice Fihn of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN):
The only ones applauding the decision to tear up the INF Treaty are the nuclear weapons manufacturers, eagerly anticipating the kickoff of Cold War II.
In short, it seems the world is no longer sleep-walking towards nuclear war. We’re marching head on.
Featured image via National Archives and Records Administration
- Support the UK-based Campaign Against Arms Trade, as well as the ICAN and Global Zero campaigns.
- Learn about the work for the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversation
Please read our comment moderation policy here.