A human rights commission has just monumentally failed Julian Assange

Last Assange video before isolation
Joe Emersberger

The Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (IACHR) has declined Julian Assange’s request that it order Ecuador to ease draconian rules imposed on him. Item 24 of the rules explicitly prohibits Assange, the head of WikiLeaks, from engaging in political speech the Ecuadorian government considers “harmful”. It effectively removes his right to free speech. Assange must comply with these rules to continue to receive asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London where he has been for several years.

Ecuador has denied Assange the ability to communicate directly with the outside world through social media for almost a year. Meanwhile, the US government has become bolder than ever in its efforts to imprison Assange for his work as a publisher. Chelsea Manning was recently jailed for refusing to give testimony against WikiLeaks.

The IACHR did not appear to say that Ecuador’s rules for Assange were legal under international law. It said his case did not meet the “requirements of gravity, urgency and irreparable harm” needed for the body to make a ruling. The reasoning behind that claim was not given.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.
Was “reminder” to Ecuador a bit of ass covering?

Oswaldo Ruiz-Chiriboga is an Ecuadorian legal scholar who teaches constitutional and human rights law at Central European University. He told The Canary the following about the IACHR’s decision:

It surprised me! But the saddest part is that the Commission is not obliged by its Rules of Procedure to provide reasons for its decisions when rejecting requests for precautionary measures. So we basically do not know why the Commission decided not to grant the requested protection. Furthermore, the Commission sent a letter to Assange’s lawyers saying that it reminded Ecuador of its obligations of protecting those who requested asylum. I do not get it. Why remind Ecuador if the Commission decided not to grant the request? Was the Commission afraid of its decision and, just to be safe, issued a reminder of the State’s obligations?

Continue reading below...

Assange was granted asylum in 2012 by the leftist President of Ecuador at the time, Rafael Correa. But Ecuador’s current president, Lenin Moreno, adopted the platform of the Ecuadorian right in 2017 immediately after taking office. That platform includes hostility towards Assange and a submissive attitude towards the US.

US economic might displayed all around

Moreno has joined the US-led effort to overthrow Venezuela’s government.  He’s recognized the Trump-anointed Juan Guaidó as Venezuela’s interim president. Ecuador has also just entered into a loan agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) whose decisions impacting developing countries are dominated by Washington.

The IACHR itself has very recently been threatened by Washington with funding cuts. Supporters of the IACHR have urged the US to keep funding it. That obviously raises questions about the political independence of the IACHR.

Certain “human rights” groups and media outlets have ignored, and in many cases snickered at, the Moreno government’s crackdown on Assange. It appears many prominent organizations are not nearly as independent of US power as they would have people believe.

Featured image via YouTube

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support