Trump and Johnson are paving the way for another disastrous invasion in the Middle East

Ed Sykes

The US and its allies recently accused Iran of being behind the 14 September attacks on the Saudi Arabian oil industry. These hit the world’s largest oil processor and an oil field. Iran, however, has denied responsibility. And critics of Washington’s longstanding military interventionism believe warmongering elites are again trying to lead the imperialist superpower into yet another disastrous Middle East invasion.

An elitist warmongering establishment walking us into another quagmire

The US is consistently the world’s biggest military spender. Saudi Arabia is in fourth place, and the UK in seventh place (though Boris Johnson’s government recently promised a big boost in military spending). Iran, meanwhile, reportedly invests a quarter of what Britain spends.

In recent months, there have been heightened tensions between the West and Iran, following Donald Trump’s 2018 exit from the Iran nuclear deal. This withdrawal essentially killed the agreement. And ever since, the US has sought to put pressure on Iran via brutal sanctions and military threats.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.




Washington also has a decades-long record of interfering in Iranian politics. One specific act of US terror, for example, was the downing in 1988 of an Iranian commercial flight in the Persian Gulf. This killed 290 civilians (including 66 children). That seems to be roughly 290 more than the number of US civilians that Iran has ever killed. Yet the elitist warmongering establishment in the US is looking for any excuse to invade Iran; and making it look like the main aggressor in the region seems to be a key tactic.

Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, has created the world’s worst humanitarian crisis in Yemen. It’s also a serial human rights abuser and has strong links to terrorism. But it’s a key US ally and arms recipient, so it gets a free pass.

Progressives challenge the march to war

For the reasons above – and more – US progressives are speaking out. Presidential hopeful Tulsi Gabbard, for example, has warned of the disastrous consequences of an attack on Iran while slamming Washington’s role in propping up the Saudi dictatorship:

Fellow presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders has also taken a clear stance against war on Iran:

Progressive comedian Jimmy Dore, meanwhile, has slammed establishment media outlets (on numerous occasions) for their role in pushing war with Iran:

We should not be defending the Saudi dictatorship

The US may claim that Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. But Washington’s own list of allies is essentially a who’s who of terrorism. The Saudi dictatorship, for example, has fuelled terrorism and committed numerous acts of terror. As part of its brutal war on Yemen, it has attacked many civilian targets. And as Tulsi Gabbard pointed out recently, it seems to have been “providing direct and indirect support directly to al-Qaeda” in the country.

The Iranian government is no role model for any progressive. But as Noam Chomsky previously pointed out:

In comparison with Saudi Arabia, Iran looks like a civil rights paradise.

And as former US Army colonel Lawrence Wilkerson recently summed up:

The greatest state sponsor of terrorism in the region, and indeed in the world, is Saudi Arabia—our ally.

Yet it’s Iran the West is targeting. Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, continues to get countless weapons and generous funding from the US. Why? Because as Trump himself has spelled out very clearly, the Saudi dictatorship serves US economic interests. Iran, on the other hand, does not.

Demand evidence. Oppose war.

Boris Johnson, however, has formally blamed Iran for the attacks on Saudi Arabian oil facilities, claiming there was a “very high degree of probability” Iran was responsible. He also refused to rule out UK military assistance if Saudi Arabia or the US requested it. This follows on from months of UK government grandstanding on Iran.

Speaking at the UN General Assembly, meanwhile, Donald Trump tried to rally support for his administration’s aggression towards Iran. He claimed Iranian actions were threatening ‘US security’ and said “I will never fail to defend America’s interests”.

Yemen’s Houthi movement, however, has claimed it was behind the attacks (in response to Saudi crimes in Yemen). And Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif stressed that “if Iran were behind this attack, nothing would have been left of this refinery”. Responding to Johnson’s finger-pointing, meanwhile, Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Abbas Mousavi insisted that “the British Government should stop selling lethal weapons to Saudi Arabia”.

In short, there are conflicting claims about responsibility. And there is currently no publicly available evidence to confirm who is to blame. One thing is certain, though: jumping into a disastrous war with Iran to please the Saudi dictatorship is something that all progressives should firmly oppose.

Featured image and additional content via Press Association

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support