The right-wing media is fuelling yet more ‘hatred and ignorance’ in defence of Boris Johnson

Boris Johnson
Support us and go ad-free

On 24 September, the UK’s Supreme Court delivered a verdict that Boris Johnson’s prorogation of parliament was unlawful. It was a truly landmark ruling. Yet the following day, the right-wing press went to town and presented a totally different picture. As one lawyer noted, they shared “misleading” front pages that spread “hatred and ignorance”.

“Grossly misleading”

The judgement stated that Johnson’s “advice” to the queen:

was unlawful, void and of no effect… The prorogation was also void and of no effect… Parliament has not been prorogued. This is the unanimous judgment of all 11 Justices.

But the right-wing press didn’t quite report it like this. Some claimed the Supreme Court was simply trying to block Brexit, while others suggested that the Supreme Court (and not Johnson) had acted unlawfully. All of them failed to present an accurate picture of the way parliament, government and the judiciary work in the UK.

As the Secret Barrister pointed out, the “editors of these newspapers are fomenting hatred and ignorance and grossly misleading their readers”:

Other people also agreed:

“Tyranny”

The key issue with all of these front pages is that they fundamentally ignore the UK’s separation of powers. This means that parliament, government and the judicial system must operate separately to avoid abuse of power. As US James Madison famously said:

The accumulation of all powers… in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.

According to the Daily Mail, the decision led Johnson to ask “Who runs Britain?” – a foolish question really to anyone who understands the separation of powers. But this is exactly what the Secret Barrister noted: it’s potentially highly misleading for many readers.

One Twitter user posted this with a wry analogy of reporting on other court verdicts:

Meanwhile, the Telegraph front page was perfect fodder to encourage Tory voters:

The Express, on the other hand, played to the “17.4m” people who voted Leave. It implied that, on this basis, Johnson wasn’t “unlawful” at all. Again, it also totally misrepresented the separation of power:

The Sun (in England), meanwhile, went for a terrible pun and claimed its readers ‘slammed’ the ruling as a “farce”:

As some people pointed out, if Jeremy Corbyn had acted in the same way, the media response would likely be very different:

The ‘most right-wing press in Europe’

This isn’t the first time the right-wing press has attacked the judiciary. In 2016, the Mail claimed judges were “Enemies of the People”. This followed a high court ruling that parliament (and not the prime minister) had to trigger Article 50.

A 2016 YouGov study found that British people perceive their press to be the most “right-wing” in Europe. Indeed, Rupert Murdoch’s News UK controls a third of our national newspapers – 70% of which are owned by just three companies.

Reporters Without Borders (RSF), meanwhile, produces an annual ‘Press Freedom Index’ (PFI), ranking every country according to government restriction of the media. And in 2018, the UK kept its “status as one of the worst-ranked Western European countries” in the PFI.

With the country in constitutional crisis and a prime minister who refuses to resign even after this ruling, we see this pattern emerging yet again. Now more than ever, we need a strong independent media to fight this propaganda.

Featured image via Flickr – Chatham House

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us