A ‘work of art’ shows just how insane modern capitalism has become

Duct-taped banana
Peter Bolton

To say that much modern art is pretentious, ostentatious, and ridiculously priced would hardly be saying anything new. But one certain sale at this year’s famous Art Basel Miami festival has plunged things to new depths of absurdity. And with economic inequality at record levels, it’s worth putting things into a broader social context.

This is art?

On Wednesday 4 December, two copies of a ‘work of art’ titled Comedian by Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan sold for $120,000 each. The price was nothing unusual for the annual Art Basel event. Galleries from around the world display paintings, sculptures and other works of art that often sell for even more. But what raised eyebrows was the fact that the piece consisted solely of a banana duct-taped to a wall.

The sales have made headlines both in the local Miami press and nationally throughout the US. And for many, the story represents peak absurdity of the world of modern art.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.




An illuminating metaphor for modern capitalism

But that’s not all. The high pricetag and low artistic merit of the ‘banana piece’ is a window into the dark soul of the capitalist system in the 21st century. To begin with, there is something seriously wrong when some people have $120,000 to spend on a banana duct-taped to a wall while others don’t even have a place to live. In the city of Miami, for example, homelessness numbers in the thousands (nationwide, the figures are in the hundreds of thousands). According to a 2015 research report, meanwhile, over 20% of households in Miami-Dade County live in poverty and around 60% of households don’t earn a living income.

It also shows how the capitalist system plays with people’s minds. The great US economist Thorstein Veblen coined the term ‘conspicuous consumption’ to describe the phenomenon of spending more money on goods than they are actually worth. For Veblem, members of what he terms ‘the leisure class’ do so in order to send signals about their (real or perceived) social standing to other members of society.

The case for socialism

The late Harvard University professor Richard Levins expanded on this idea by arguing that “the tastes and styles of a dominant class or society acquire a prestige far beyond any intrinsic value”. He adds:

in a society that isolates people from each other, the remedy for despair is shopping. People who have experienced poverty sometimes find safety in accumulating things. And the capitalist imperative to expand leads to gigantic sales efforts to promote those feelings while inventing new ways for people to get into debt. All of these dimensions feed into consumerism.

But for socialism, a rising standard of living is not unlimited consumption of energy and matter. Rather, it centers on a rising quality of life.

With cases of conspicuous consumption and levels of economic inequality reaching such absurd levels, it is high time that we heed Levins’s words. The need to build a socialist society in which the needs of everyone come before needless luxuries of a wealthy few is perhaps greater today than ever before.

Featured image via YouTube

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. Somebody said recently that he believed modern art is a new way to launder money or pay illegal funds. Artwork can cross international borders easier than a briefcase of money can, and the change of owners can see money move from one bank account into another without raising alerts over money laundering. When all said and done you don’t even have to move the piece, you just change who it’s registered to, which is possibly why this one was eaten–once the money’s been paid they didn’t need it, and it blatantly rubs the con in all our faces.

    2. “It also shows how the capitalist system plays with people’s minds. The great US economist Thorstein Veblen coined the term ‘conspicuous consumption’ to describe the phenomenon of spending more money on goods than they are actually worth.”
      This phenomenon is not restricted to the rich, but is prevalent across society in the form of ‘fashion’. And I would argue that ‘fashion’ is not a product of the indoctrination of capitalism, but by an innate human desire to gain some form of ‘status’.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.