• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 4, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Western elites salivate over turning Iran into Iraq 2.0 – but this is not 2003

Oil, regime change, lies about WMDs, and MSM complicity. Sound familiar?

Ed Sykes by Ed Sykes
2 February 2026
in Analysis
Reading Time: 5 mins read
229 9
A A
1
Home Global Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Western powers have given Israel a free pass to livestream its genocide in Gaza. But with recent weeks bringing increasing criticism and resistance, the apartheid state is now trying to push its Western accomplices into backing its unprovoked war on Iran. Undoubtedly, many in the Western halls of power are salivating over the prospect of regime change in oil-rich Iran. However, it’s still possible to stop Israel’s provocation turning into Iraq 2.0.

Corporate commentators salivate over Iran’s oil

Israel has spent decades trying to push for war against Iran. Why? Because Iran and its allies in the Middle East have long been the only ones actually presenting a military challenge to Israel’s settler-colonial crimes in Palestine.

Before the disastrous US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, for example, Israeli war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu promised that ousting Saddam Hussein would be great for the region. In reality, his overthrow created ‘a thousand Saddams’, leading to the deaths of up to a million civilians amid skyrocketing non-state terror. Today, Netanyahu and other Israeli officials are repeating this playbook, threatening Iran’s leader with the same fate and trying to convince the world this would actually be good for the region.

Iran has the planet’s third-biggest crude oil reserves and second-biggest proven reserves of natural gas. And corporate commentators are openly admitting that replacing Iran’s government with a US-submissive regime would be good for fossil-fuel bosses:

They're already talking about regime change and taking Iran's oil.

I feel sick. pic.twitter.com/5odJXETbWZ

— ADAM (@AdameMedia) June 16, 2025

The Western establishment media, meanwhile, is faithfully trying to beat the drums of war on Iran, with headlines like Trump is urged to go “all in” on crushing Iran and What are Trump’s options for dealing with Iran?. From the US to the UK, and from France to Germany, conservative and liberal propagandists alike are acting like we should sympathise with the genocidal aggressor, Israel, over the hundreds of civilians it has already killed with its unprovoked assault on Iran. Even Israeli media admit that the apartheid state is hungry for war, but their Western counterparts fail to point that out.

The problem is, it’s so easy to expose Israel’s lies

In 2003, social media was in its infancy and mainstream propaganda still dominated. So the lies, illegality, pointlessness, and heartless chaos of the invasion of Iraq prevailed. But now, a quick search for the facts reveals that:

  • Iran was at the negotiating table, ready to pledge never to develop nuclear weapons.
  • US intelligence itself recently assessed that Iran was not currently developing such weapons.
  • Israel, meanwhile, already has nuclear weapons, which it is currently modernising with Western support.
  • The apartheid state blew up the negotiating table with its unprovoked attack on Iran.
  • Israel is now openly engaging in international terrorism in Iran, just like it did in Lebanon last year.
  • The rogue nation is threatening Iranian civilians with collective punishment, demanding that they leave the capital en masse (which is almost certainly illegal).

Because of this, many people can immediately see straight through the ridiculously embarrassing attempts by Western politicians and media outlets to convince people that the victim is somehow the bad guy and the aggressor is the good guy.

In 2003, meanwhile, the invasion of Iraq came under two years after the “single largest loss of life resulting from a foreign attack on American soil” on 9/11. So, the massive climate of fear in the US essentially opened the door for overall public support for the invasion. Only years later did many people actually wake up to the absolute disaster that it was.

2025 is different

Donald Trump, meanwhile, actually tried to paint himself as some kind of anti-war sage in a break from the Republican Party establishment that destroyed Iraq. He even warned that Barack Obama was going to start a war with Iran. But when Obama – as one of the few good things he did – actually made a deal with Iran, Trump trashed it as soon as he took office, unnecessarily ramping up tensions.

Israel is a “junior partner” – in Netanyahu’s own words – to US imperialism. But while the US fears few repercussions of the genocide it has funded in occupied Gaza, it is much more wary about taking on the more powerful Iran. And Trump himself knows that a big section of his base is against pointless foreign wars of aggression.

Israel, meanwhile, is haemorrhaging money protecting itself from Iranian retaliation. It is riling some US figures by holding US citizens hostage. And a full-blown war would impact the US economy at a time when it’s already struggling.

There was no 9/11 moment pushing the US to act. Trump does not have the overwhelming support of US citizens for a war that Israel stubbornly started amid a genocide that has everyone’s attention. And he risks severely undermining his political brand if he does attack Iran. So while nothing is off the table, and the drums of war are beating just as they were in 2003, there is still reason to believe 2025 will not see Iran become Iraq 2.0.

Featured image via YouTube screenshot/CBC News

Tags: IranIraq WarisraelpalestineUS
Share176Tweet110ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Israel continues to terrorise Palestinians whilst attacking Iran

Next Post

Horoscope today: your 24-hour briefing for life, love, and more

Next Post
Horoscope today: your 24-hour briefing for life, love, and more

Horoscope today: your 24-hour briefing for life, love, and more

Why Some UK Players Avoid Local Casinos—and What That Says About Regulation

Why Some UK Players Avoid Local Casinos—and What That Says About Regulation

US voters oppose Israel's war on Iran, but the US is involved already

Liz Kendall speaking at a podium. DWP logo.

A new FOI has destroyed Labour's argument that its DWP PIP cuts will support disabled people into work

Massive turnout outside court to support Kneecap's Mo Chara as UK tries to silence criticism of Israel

Comments 1

  1. Gnu says:
    12 months ago

    There are some other reasons too, Ed.

    The US simply cannot position enough troops to invade Iran, meaning this is aerial bombing and terrorist-cells alone.

    Iran is an integral part of BRICS, anchoring West Asia, and Russia and China are 100% behind defending them.

    The only way the US can “Help” Israel with its war is by turning to the nuclear option, or giving Israhell the green light to do so – something that is very likely, appallingly.

    As Brian Berletic has warned, repeatedly, this attack is NOT by Israhell, but has been long-planned by the Empire itself, even the ‘Hesitant bride’ theatrics we are seeing was all laid out years ago by RAND.

    It would be an actual fucking miracle if the US does not ‘go in’ on this war – despite it LITERALLY meaning the end of the Western hegemony, either by breaking the Western economies; or by ending the World itself in nuclear hellfire.

    There are people who would prefer to see the World destroyed than lose their own exorbitant privileges.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Israel
Analysis

Israel abducts Palestine international women’s football player

by HG
4 June 2026
UK
News

UK ‘special operations’ soldier died at base Iran attacked in March

by Joe Glenton
4 June 2026
water
News

Private water company fined record £2m over hospitalising parasite outbreak

by Cameron Baillie
4 June 2026
Mandelson
Uncategorized

Mandelson and the missing messages

by Jody McIntyre
3 June 2026
Labour
Uncategorized

Labour MP lobbied for political commentators to have their visas revoked

by Jody McIntyre
3 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart