I’m so over listening to white men on the BBC talking about Muslim women
As the ‘debate’ on Boris Johnson’s comments about Muslim women who choose to wear the face veil rages on, one group of people is conspicuously absent from British media: Muslim women.
On 8 August, on BBC Radio 4, host John Humphrys discussed the issue with former Conservative MP Eric Pickles. Pickles, while expressing regret at Johnson’s choice of words, declared:
It’s a perfectly legitimate debate for people to have.
What is the ‘debate’?
I would like to ask here: what is the debate?
Is it that women who choose to cover their face should show it to authorities when their identity needs to be confirmed? Because this already happens. There is no debate here. Or is it about the UK banning face coverings in public, a position that both Pickles and Johnson have already professed to be against?
In reality, the only reason white men are so keen to debate the burqa or niqab is so that they can impose their views on Muslim women. Men wanting to exercise their authority and control over women by policing how they dress is nothing new. White men in power publicly describing Muslim women as “bank robbers” and “letter boxes” is both misogynistic and racist. It is boldfaced hate.
Humphrys, perhaps in an attempt to be edgy, asked Pickles:
He [Johnson] called the burqa ‘oppressive and ridiculous’, now is that acceptable language?
To this, Pickles responded that we should “avoid giving offence if we can”.
By couching the discussion in terms of “debate” and “offence”, both Pickles and Humphrys are guilty of justifying and enabling Johnson’s racism. Being referred to as ‘oppressed’, ‘ridiculous’, a ‘bank robber’, or a ‘letterbox’ is not merely offensive; it is traumatising and humiliating. And to humiliate a group of minority women in this way is a calculated move which sends a message to Johnson’s right-wing followers, making it clear whose side he’s on.
Muslim women are everywhere… except British media
Later on, ITV‘s daytime show Loose Women decided to carry on the trend, by discussing the ‘issue’ of Muslim women’s face veil without the presence of a single Muslim woman. False comparisons were drawn with women travelling to Muslim countries being expected to follow a dress code. Yet no one cared to mention that in a supposedly liberal society, stopping women from dressing as they choose is as oppressive as forcing women to dress a certain way.
Moreover, some people have got the misguided impression that they have the right to tell Muslims what is and isn’t ‘a requirement’ in the Islamic faith.
@loosewomen ladies re @BorisJohnson the Burka full face coverings are NOT a requirement in the Koran. Dress modestly it says. Its a geographical culture thing and face coverings regardless of religion should be banned from public places. Ten years ago one of the London Bombers
— Bill (@Billy24163344) August 8, 2018
The theme of everyone except Muslim women speaking on behalf of Muslim women, therefore, seems to be a persistent one. In his Radio 4 interview, Pickles declared: “The position that I have laid out is one that most people would agree with… particularly those who wear the burqa themselves” [emphasis added].
I would love to ask Pickles how many burqa-wearing women he consulted with before making such a confident statement. Either way, it’s clear that both ITV and the BBC find it acceptable to discuss Johnson’s comments without the presence of the very group that was his target: Muslim women.
What now of Tory Islamophobia?
Many senior officials in the Conservative Party, including PM Theresa May and Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, have called on Johnson to apologise for his comments.
These calls, however, have fallen on deaf ears, as no apology seems forthcoming. Meanwhile, the elephant in the room of Islamophobia in the Tory party continues to be ignored.
In all honesty, I can’t say that I’m surprised – or that I know many others who are surprised – at the level of Islamophobia in the Conservative Party. I don’t need an official inquiry to confirm what I already know, from this latest incident as well as many similar instances in recent years.
David Cameron, in his time as prime minister, called [paywall] Muslim women ‘traditionally submissive’. He singled out “Islamist extremism” as the problem while the EDL marched unobstructed in Luton, and later said [paywall] Muslims were not doing enough to tackle extremism. Conservative MPs Sarah Wollaston [paywall] and Nadine Dorries have regularly undermined the agency of Muslim women by calling the Muslim face veil oppressive and anti-feminist. Pickles’ letter to the Muslim community in his time as communities secretary was widely criticised for being condescending and “unhelpful”.
For years, Islamophobia from the highest levels of the Conservative Party has been unabashed and persistent. How much more evidence do we really need? If Baroness Warsi was truly perturbed by the situation, the right thing to do – for her and other Muslim Conservatives – would be to dissociate from a party that has built its foundations on attacking the most marginalised and vulnerable people in our society.
– Read our other articles on Islamophobia.
– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
– Write to your MP, asking them to demand an official inquiry into Islamophobia in the Conservative Party.
Featured images via Steve- Flickr/ Andrew Parsons- Flickr
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.