Turkish leader plans to move at least one million refugees from all over Syria into the areas invaded by the Turkish military and its proxies in northern Syria (aka Rojava). ‘s plans have nothing to do with the welfare of Syrian refugees. Because his apparent aim is to ethnically cleanse the majority-Kurdish population of Rojava.
An invasion designed to crush a revolution
The Turkish invasion, which began on 9 October, is intended to crush the revolutionary movement in Rojava. This revolution is based on women’s freedom, direct democracy, peaceful co-existence, and living in harmony with the natural world.
because it acts as a beacon of hope for those who want to create radical peoples’ democracy in Turkeysees the revolution in Rojava as a threat to his own autocratic rule
86% of refugees ‘not from northern or eastern Syria’
The Rojava Information Center reports that:
The Turkish government’s own figures show that nearly 3 million of the 3.6 million Syrian refugees… 86% of the total [number of refugees thatwants to move] are not from North and East Syria.
Creating hundreds of thousands of new refugees
The Turkish invasion of Rojava has already displaced 300,000 people, including 70,000 children. But the situation could get much worse. Rojava Information Center quotes one resident of the border region as saying (before yesterday’s Turkey-Russia deal):
If Turkey attack the whole border at least one million will have to leave their homes. There is no capacity and no space to cover their needs. Children and elderly will die.
Starting 12.00 noon of October 23, 2019, Russian military police and Syrian border guards will enter the Syrian side of the Turkish-Syrian border to facilitate the removal of YPG elements and their weapons to the depth of 30km (19 miles) from the Turkish-Syrian border, which should be finalized in 150 hours.
As the agreement was announced, the Rojava Information Center reported:
Displaced families continue to move south from the border, and many have also fled from Tel Tamer fearing further incursion by Turkish proxies. The situation in [Internally Displaced Person] camps is reaching breaking point, as international aid food packets have not reached Al Hol and the population of Mahmoudi camp swells from new arrivals.
What is happening in Rojava is in breach of international law. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court states that “deportation or forcible transfer of population” is a crime against humanity.
The statute explains that:
“Deportation or forcible transfer of population” means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law
yet another war crime; to force out the majority-Kurdish residents of Rojava and replace them with refugees who do not come from the area.‘s apparent intention, then, is to commit
A repeat of what happened in Afrin
Since the invasion, the occupying forces have carried out torture, forced disappearances and looting. Many of Afrin’s residents have been killed or imprisoned. And members of Turkish backed militia groups have been moved into the homes of displaced Afrin residents.
And Afrin wasn’t the first attempt to ethnically cleanse the region. In the 1970s, the Syrian regime moved thousands of Arab-Syrian citizens into Rojava in an attempt to create an “Arab belt”.
Using displaced people as a weapon
Berivan Qereçox, a British internationalist currently in Rojava, told The Canary:
The plans for ‘resettlement’ of refugees is part of a plan thatannounced months ago. You can see how he’s playing the game. He is making a threat to Europe, using this demonised vision of refugees, that he will send [the refugees] to them if they don’t do what he wants. At the same time, he is using displaced people as a weapon to wield over north and east Syria.
‘s government has been given a huge amount of money by the EU due to the situation with Syrian refugees. [This money] has been spent only on building a huge and divisive wall [along the northern Syrian border], and not on any efforts to improve the lives of displaced people in Turkey or anywhere else.
There’s a huge amount of very good documentation of how bad the lives of refugees in Turkey are and the kind of treatment they are subjected to there.
So [‘s] announcement that he wants to resettle people [in Rojava] has got nothing to do with humanitarian priorities or human rights or the right of people to a home. What he wants to do is to conduct demographic change on the area of north and east Syria – to pick up populations that are majority Arab, whatever their political backgrounds and affiliation might be, transport them to areas that are majority Kurdish, and enforce that demographic change on those areas.
The Autonomous Administration [of Northern Syria] has always had a clear response to this threat, which is to say that anyone whose home was originally in north and east Syria… is of course welcome to return. What they will not accept is several thousand more people from other parts of Syria being forced to move here in order to change the demography of the area.
Meanwhile, the Turkish state’s current occupation war has recently created a minimum of 300,000 displaced people.has turned these people into refugees. So the idea that he is interested in the displaced people of Syria and their right to return to their homes is absolutely ludicrous.
Stop the ethnic cleansing
We need to stand with the people of Rojava who are resisting Turkish invasion. Right now, the movement is calling for a boycott of Turkey and a no-fly zone to prevent ethnic cleansing and genocide. Those of us who oppose militarism, racism, male domination, and borders need to organise in whatever way we can to support those demands and prevent the ethnic cleansing.
Featured image via Rojava Information Center/@DaveEubankFBR
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?