The Sun deleted its latest Jeremy Corbyn smear after being caught using neo-Nazi sources

The Sun logo, flames
Support us and go ad-free

On Saturday 7 November, the Sun managed to plunge to a depth even we didn’t think was possible. It published a smear about Jeremy Corbyn headlined:

Ex-British intelligence officers say Jeremy Corbyn is at the centre of a hard-left extremist network.

The story itself is laughable. These supposed intelligence officers have basically just scribbled a load of coloured lines on a website and added some names and links to back up their claims. But it’s much worse than just another dodgy Sun story, because the researchers of this network used neo-Nazi and antisemitic sources to back up its already incredibly dodgy points:


But it seems actual provable connections with Nazis were too much even for the Sun. And by the evening of 7 December, the article had been ‘legally removed’ from its website.

Fear the imaginary network of doom!

Labour Exposed published the Hijacked Labour chart that claims Corbyn is a ‘neo-Marxist’ who ‘does not believe in the truth’.

And this, apparently, backs up its claims alongside its Nazi sources:

















Now this diagram by itself would be laughable. It’s badly researched and it makes itself look bigger than it is due to listing numerous local anti-fascist and Stop The War groups. And seriously, if you want a diagram with ridiculously convoluted links, I could draw them a far better one based on the many campaigns and good causes Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell have supported over the years.

And then there’s the fact that the chart links to cultural theorists like Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault who are not only well-respected and widely taught at universities – but also died years ago.

But it’s not laughable when people are named as part of a “hard-left extremist network” in a national newspaper – potentially putting them at risk. It’s certainly not laughable when the people who’ve put this site together believe that antisemitic and neo-Nazi sources are acceptable. And it’s certainly not laughable that a national newspaper decides to print and give voice to this nonsense just days before an election.

Apology, what apology?

The Sun took down the article late afternoon on 7 December. The exact reason is unknown (the paper did not reply to a request for comment from The Canary). But looking at the url – it appears the page was removed for legal reasons:










Now any respectable publication that had to take down an article in this manner would apologise and print a retraction. But it appears that neither the Sun, nor the author of the piece, political editor Tom Newton Dunn, seems to think this necessary.

Journalist Owen Jones, who is named in the network and who has previously been the subject of both threats and a violent attack from the far right, described it as a “scandal”:

Meanwhile, the BBC appeared to think that Newton Dunn was a suitable person to grace its Sunday morning sofa to review the papers:

And despite publishing an article with antisemitic and neo-Nazi sources, Newton Dunn still had the cheek to try and capitalise on the antisemitism smears against Corbyn:

Not the first time

Earlier in the election campaign, journalist Paul Mason predicted that:

towards the end of this election this will become very, very vicious.

He also spoke about the Zinoviev letter that was faked by MI5 and MI6 to destabilise and wreck Labour’s chances of winning the election in 1924. The letter called on communists to support the Labour Party. It was printed four days before the election, and:

the Mail splashed headlines across its front page claiming: Civil War Plot by Socialists’ Masters: Moscow Orders To Our Reds; Great Plot Disclosed. Labour lost by a landslide.

Mason expected that there will be:

one Zinoviev letter scale lie per day in the last seven days of this election.

It appears that the Sun is taking a leaf from this playbook. But it’s not the first time it’s done so. On the eve of the 2017 election, the Sun, alongside other papers, tried to link Corbyn to extremism. In that case, it was supposed support for al-Muhajiroun at a protest in 2002. But The Canary was able to show, through documents from a police database about the protest, that this story was total nonsense.

Beyond disgusting

This latest story is perhaps a new low for the Sun. Because it’s not just an attempt to smear Corbyn, it’s creating a real risk for the people named. And it’s doing so based on vile racist sources. And refusing to apologise both to readers who will have been mislead by its story and to the people named exemplifies the utter contempt the paper has for the general public.

As Mason said, it’s likely that similar stories will surface over the coming days. This is a disgusting, dirty election full of dangerous lies, smears, and falsehoods. The Conservative government and its billionaire backers in the press know they’ll lose with the truth. So they’re hoping we believe their lies. Please let’s make sure that on 13 December these people wake up to a nasty shock when they realise we’re not mugs; we’re not stupid, and we can see through their lies and smears.

Featured image via PixabayWikimedia – News International Newspapers

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I cannot make out detail in the diagram but if it is naming/connecting people whom the Sun alleges to be involved in some kind of criminal conspiracy then this may be an occasion when lawyers could serve useful purpose. The word ‘libel’ comes to mind.

      Removal of the diagram by the Sun from its website strongly suggests second thoughts over its veracity and fear of consequences. Doubtless damage will have been done but that of a political nature and presumably not amenable to remedy in civil action must be assumed water under the bridge. Nevertheless, the named individuals should consider banding together and hammering the Sun and the Murdoch clan into the ground.

      Assuming various efforts of the Sun and other gutter press (nowadays including broadsheets) do not influence the electorate sufficiently for Johnson (plus his knavish chums) to retain power, this and previous instances of news media misuse of their titular ‘authority’ must lead to a serious reckoning.

      Further Royal Commissions on the press would be time wasting effort ending with little change to the status quo. Instead, Labour in consultation with sympathetic individuals from other parties should, during its first term, introduce legislation breaking up privately owned media conglomerates. In addition, regulation of behaviour of interested parties, including the press, during an election campaign requires revisiting. With these cans of worms opened Labour and like-minded politicians from other parties ought go further into distancing monetary influence from elections and politics in general.

    2. This plus the Labour anti-Semitism map drawn up by Gnasherjew member Ray Baker puts Labour party members and supporters at real risk of harm. I really hope that somebody takes action to get this taken down. It has been tried with the map, but the company that hosts the site with the map says it has no control over its users (the company is in Israel).

    3. Good proposals above to counter the news from those who love hellfire, and everyone else be damned. The Sun’s Logo looks like Hell not the Sun everytime I see it.
      Break up the media conglomerates including all their forms of media outlets. Based on the view they are a threat to civil society, and harming a respectful functioning of democracy.
      It would increase a diversity of opinion. With these 5 billionaires you only have one opinion to suit all. If you disagree you are socially smeared period. No debate, no wit, nothing.
      Lies. just lies, and endless lies by these people.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.