Tory minister’s remarks on new UK oil drilling plan may be the dumbest thing ever uttered by this government

Kwasi Kwarteng
Support us and go ad-free

It’s difficult to think of anything more dumb than planning to find new sources of dirty oil and gas when the planet is ecologically collapsing because of dirty oil and gas. That is unless your name is Kwasi Kwarteng. And the Tory business and energy secretary’s associated remarks have outstripped even that proposal itself in sheer absurdity.

A message to the world…

As scientists warned that the climate crisis could mean regular wildlfires blazing across Britain in the not-too-distant future, the government made an upbeat announcement. In what can only be described as the policy equivalent of dancing on its own citizens’ future graves, ministers cheerily explained that it had struck a “landmark deal” on fossil fuel exploration.

The deal will allow oil and gas companies to keep digging in the North Sea for more sources of dirty fossil fuels. The government is also planning to pay for it with billions of taxpayer cash. Of course, that means dirty energy companies are laughing all the way to the bank. But the government’s buoyancy didn’t centre on that aspect of the plan (even the Tories must recognise what a hard sell that would be). No, the government portrayed the deal as something to celebrate because it will allegedly “support the oil and gas industry’s transition to clean, green energy”.

But how will allowing companies to expand dirty energy production support their transition to clean energy? Apparently because those companies will have to pass a “climate compatibility” test to get in on the act. This test will be implemented through the government setting up:

a new Climate Compatibility Checkpoint before each future oil and gas licensing round to ensure licences awarded are aligned with wider climate objectives, including net-zero emissions by 2050, and the UK’s diverse energy supply

Like a choke-able cherry on top of this horseshit-filled celebration cake, Kwarteng then added:

Today, we are sending a clear message around the world that the UK will be a nation of clean energy as we build back better and greener from the pandemic.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
…the UK is NO climate leader

The plan does send a clear message to the world. The first line of that message reads ‘Selecting the UK to host the UN climate change conference in 2021 (COP26) was a big mistake’. The second line is along the lines of ‘for leadership on saving the planet, look to the UK at your peril’. The third is ‘this is what happens when you put rabid capitalists in charge, suckers’.

As many have pointed out since the scandalous announcement, the road to a clean energy future should not include exploring for further sources of dirty energy:

In fact, as the above Tweeter pointed out, the world can’t use its existing reserves of fossil fuels if it wants a hope in hell of avoiding immense global warming.

So the only reasonable plan for the North Sea would be no new exploration. Indeed, as Denmark’s minister of climate, energy, and utilities and Costa Rica’s minister of environment and energy previously said in a joint article:

we need to put an end to fossil fuel exploration and establish final cutoff dates for [existing] production

That’s why Mel Evans, the head of Greenpeace UK’s oil campaign, argues that a good plan from the UK government would be putting all its energies “into a nationwide programme of retraining, reskilling and investment in renewables and green infrastructure”.

Expecting a good plan from this government is clearly too much to ask, however. That should come as no surprise though. The North Sea plan is the latest in a long line of proposals that show the UK is severely lacking in adequate leadership when it comes to the climate and biodiversity crises.

Featured image via YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. This beggars belief. Presumably it’ll all be based on the absurd and expensive notion of carbon capture rather than developing more and better renewable sources and, most importantly, energy storage facilities.

    2. Well the money just vapourized in London’s hands unlike what happened in Norway where they established a Hertiage fund now worth over a Trillion in Savings.
      I guess the Union Jack could of been bigger in the Ministry’s photo with Kwassi. It takes the place of the Revenues Scotland may have kept for its own savings plan that London has squandered or shuffled off to the Cayman Islands for safety.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.