The mainstream media lied about the Bristol protests

Bristol police, Guardian and BBC
Support us and go ad-free

Police with broken bones. Bricks thrown. A “mob intent on violence”. These are just some of the disinformation and lies published in the mainstream media about Bristol’s recent Kill The Bill protests. They’re narratives that are spread by both the government and its puppet police force, and published unquestioningly by the Guardian, Sky News, the BBC amongst others.

The Canary takes a quick look at just some of the disinformation that has been printed.

Where are your broken bones?

On 21 March, after Bristol protesters’ siege of Bridewell police station, the mainstream media quoted a police statement by Will White of Avon and Somerset Police, who said:

One officer suffered a broken arm and another suffered broken ribs. Both have been taken to hospital.

These are men and women out there with the intention of serving and protecting the public – they should never be subjected to assaults or abuse in this way.

Days later, the police admitted that, actually, no police officers had suffered from broken bones. But the damage was done, and media outlets worldwide had spread the lie. The false police statement nicely fitted into the government’s portrayal of protesters’ “thuggery“. The police have a proven track record of not investigating liars in their ranks, so it’s unlikely that the person responsible will face any consequences.

“Human excrement”

A few days later, on 23 March, The Canary witnessed hundreds of riot police brutally attack protesters who were sitting down on College Green. The BBC was quick to report the police’s statement once again. Avon and Somerset police chief constable Andy Marsh said:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

It had the making of a rave or a party rather than a protest…we would be having a very different conversation if we had allowed 200 people to set-up a camp on college green with music, food stalls, and human excrement.

You’re damned if you do, and you’re damned if you don’t. If you’re protesting at the police station, you get attacked. If you take a different approach and protest with music and speeches far from the police station, you’re accused of having a rave and are attacked with even more force. Marsh’s ridiculous addition of “human excrement” in his statement is a deliberate ploy, used constantly by right-wingers, to discredit demonstrators as disgusting and unwashed. Needless to say, his comment is a load of sh*t.

More disinformation

Then, on Friday 26 March, around 1,000 Bristolians demonstrated for the third time against the Police Bill. The protest ended, once again, outside Bridewell police station, which was protected by riot police on all sides: the same riot police who had used extreme violence against Tuesday’s protesters. People sat down in front of police lines for a few hours. As the evening progressed, I witnessed more lines of riot police lining up. They appeared on a parallel street, too, along with their horses and dogs, obviously gearing up to charge at the crowd. Suddenly, they attacked. From my viewpoint, I clearly saw a police officer, who was seemingly out of control, crack his rectangular shield down again and again onto protesters’ heads.

There was a huge amount of footage on social media of these disgraceful police attacks on protesters. But the mainstream media was, once again, quick to report otherwise. The Guardian headline led with the police’s account, saying that bricks and bottles were thrown at officers, rather than leading with an actual account of real events: that protesters sitting down had their heads cracked open by police; that police had used their riot shields as weapons to cause serious injury. The Guardian quoted the police a number of times, even having the audacity to give superintendent Mark Runacres a voice as he said of protesters, “this violent conduct is not acceptable”.

Meanwhile, Sky News reported complete lies about the evening’s events, saying that windows were smashed and police vans were torched:

Sky News later retracted this, but once again the damage was done; the disinformation was already out there.

Gaslighting yet again

Meanwhile, as social media flooded with footage showing the police violence, Priti Patel tweeted that officers had her “full support“. She said:

This is Patel and the Tory government on top gaslighting form again. As the actual “criminal minority” smash their shields into people’s heads, pepper spray protesters and set dogs on them, the narrative is turned on its head, and it is the victims who are called criminals. The government knows that if it accuses its opposition of the very thing its state-sanctioned thugs are guilty of, it might just get away with fooling the public.

Too little, too late

It took days for liberal newspaper the Guardian and its sister publication the Observer to publish accounts from protesters on the ground: long after The Canary had published its reports of what really happened. On 27 March, The Observer printed a piece titled Protest is a human right. Again on 27 March, the Guardian published an article about how journalists were being assaulted by police. But this news was only deemed as important because it was a mainstream media journalist from the Mirror who was assaulted. In the same article, the Guardian finally published information about protesters’ injuries, arguably because they were so well-documented on social media that they couldn’t ignore them any more.

On 28 March, the Guardian published a brilliant piece by the Bristol Cable‘s Matty Edwards, who has been on the ground in the city. But Edwards’ article was tagged as ‘Opinion’, while the police’s statements were printed in news reports as unquestionable facts.

This attempt by the Guardian to show that it is still the newspaper of the left has come far too late. The Bristol protests have only emphasised more clearly than ever that the mainstream press, with its concentrated ownership, is there to uphold the status quo, or is too scared to challenge the government or the police for fear of losing its advertising revenue.

This is all too evident when we see a publication like the Independent publishing police images of people wanted for arrest. Being featured in a police press release doesn’t mean a person has committed a crime, yet it does scare people. Governments of domination rely on fear to keep their populations obedient. By publishing these images, the media is helping the state to control its people by attempting to make them so terrified that they won’t dissent.

Disinformation is nothing new

Of course, disinformation and dangerous bias parroted by the mainstream media is nothing new. Back in 1988, Chomsky and Herman wrote about how:

money and power are able to filter out the news fit to print, marginalize dissent, and allow the government and dominant private interests to get their messages across to the public.

The organisation Media Lens has been busy documenting the media’s distorted version of the world for over twenty years, holding popular newspapers and broadcasters to account. Meanwhile, it is radical and local media outlets such as The Canary and the Bristol Cable that are brave enough to tell the truth.

More protests against the Police Bill are planned throughout the country this week. The government wants us to focus our energies on condemning the “criminal minority”, intent on drawing our attention away from the very reason why people are so angry in the first place.

No matter how distorted the media gets, and no matter how violent the police become, we won’t be silenced. The fight to Kill The Bill is far from over.

Featured image via Eliza Egret / Wikimedia Commons

Support us and go ad-free

Fund our Investigations Unit

You can help us investigate corruption, expose injustice and uncover the truth.

As one of the only independent investigations units in the country, we work for you – but we need your help to keep going. We need to raise £10,000 to continue our groundbreaking investigations. Can you chip in?

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. Personally witnessed the Criminal Justice bill riots (1996?) in London.
      A 2 story float with loud music turned up out of nowhere halfway through the protest which clearly wasn’t part of the event.
      Turned out it was a honey trap to pull the gathering crowds away from the protests speakers and towards a police line.

      As everyone crowded up to the Hyde park fence to see what was happening those at the front got squashed (I was sat upon a grey utility box).
      From my vantage I saw the flash point. A protestor dropped his sign on the other side of the fence, so he bent to pick it up. 2 officers in full gear grabbed him and proceeded to drag him over. His friends held onto him. Then police started beating the protesters defended him up.
      After that it was wave after wave of officers attacking and rioters responding in kind.

    2. Police with broken bones. Bricks thrown. A “mob intent on violence” These are just some of the disinformation and lies published in the mainstream media about Bristol’s recent Kill the Bill protests. They’re narratives that are spread by both the government and its puppet police force, and published unquestioningly by the Guardian, Sky News, the BBC amongst others.
      Residents-voter of U.K. Wales-N-Ireland-Scotland as well do you think the following
      Should happen for all of them for misleading us public yes or no?
      ///
      My proposals of punishment to all involved residents +voters of Britain.
      //
      P-1 Government Minister or M.P. should be sacked and pay a large personal fine to a charity out of their own pockets, and NOT use our Taxpayer money yes or no?
      //
      P-2 The area police Officer spreading misleading information must be sacked
      And the Crime COM of the area where the Police Officer is a signed too, they
      Should also be fined personally (money again being paid to a charity serves)
      And fine’s NOT being paid out of Police Budget funds yes or no?
      //
      P-3 Paper bosses should be fined for misleading us public again fines used to fund
      Charities needs they should also be STOPPED from any public views for a month
      At a time depending on the amount of damage done by the misleading information
      to Govt and public alike the month could be extended more yes or no?
      //
      P-4 Tory Govt Boris, the B.B.C. should be fined large cash amount that should go to charities, plus lose T.V. license perk stop it fully form being charged to us publics
      They may have misled us British public plus other country residents in E.U. areas
      This could also apply to SKY news I.T.V. news and other live T.V. news programmes.
      That spread the misleading information no more pat on the hand?? for misleading
      The public time to put a stop to this carry on yes or no?
      FINALLY!
      Tory Govt will you place a new law in place to do what I suggest in this post
      To put a stop to all you misleading us public before end of year 2021 yes or no?

    3. When you have socially criminal minded class of overlords that’s what happens , and no recourse to the law for justice either.
      Its beyond the pale now, and what they really want is to war with the populace to bring it under control again. A fantasy!
      No social order proscribed here. Just the exercise of raw power without an intelligence for peace or prosperity.
      England is becoming impoverished quickly by these wealthy people.
      The Unite man was a treat to hear on Canary that after 42 years they won. It’s that kind of person who created our modern society against all odds.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.