We should never forget Bobby Sands, nor the brutality of the Thatcher government in Ireland
Today marks the 40th anniversary of the death of Bobby Sands inside the H-blocks of Long Kesh internment camp. On 5 May 1981, Sands laid down his life for his and his comrades’ right for recognition as political prisoners. On this day, we should remember the sacrifice he made for the cause of Irish freedom. But his struggle does not just provide an example that all anti-imperialists should follow. It also serves as an important reminder of the ruthless brutality of the British government in Ireland under the leadership of then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher. And that is equally something that we should never forget.
‘Criminalisation’ leads to ‘blanket protest’
On 1 March, 1976, the British government announced an end to ‘Special Category’ status for members of paramilitary organisations imprisoned for offences related to the conflict in Ireland. This formed part of a multi-pronged propaganda strategy to falsely portray the republican insurrection against British rule as some kind of aggravated crime wave.
In response, republican prisoners began a series of protests to regain the lost privileges, as well as the symbolic importance of prisoner of war status. This included the right to wear one’s own clothes, free association and exemption from prison work. IRA volunteer Kieran Nugent began the ‘blanket protest’ when he refused to wear a prison uniform. Thrown into his cell naked, he draped himself in the only thing available – a grey, prison-issue blanket.
The ‘dirty protest’ and the 1980 hunger strike
After suffering beatings from prison officers on their way to the shower areas, republican prisoners began the ‘no wash protest’, in which they refused to bathe, cut their hair or shave. When prison officers refused to empty their chamber pots, republican prisoners were forced to smear their own excrement on the walls, which marked the beginning of the ‘dirty protest’.
In 1979, their prospects became even bleaker with the election of the right-wing government of Margaret Thatcher in Britain. When it became clear that Thatcher wouldn’t grant even the most modest of concessions, republican prisoners began a hunger strike in 1980. It ended without any deaths when her government appeared to concede some of the strikers’ demands. But the document containing the terms of the agreement turned out to be vague and open to interpretation, and the prison regime was quickly returned to a situation little better than how it was before.
A second hunger strike, and this time to the death
Determined not to be double-crossed again, the new Officer Commanding (OC) of the republican prisoners, 27-year-old Bobby Sands, launched a second hunger strike with a crucial difference from the last. The strikers would stagger their joining of the fast one-by-one and two weeks apart so that each would near death one at a time. As OC, Sands volunteered to go first, making him the most likely to die. On 1 March, 1981, Sands refused his prison food, beginning the second hunger strike in Long Kesh just over two months after the end of the first.
On 5 March, less than a week into Sands’ fast, Frank Maguire, the independent nationalist member of parliament for Fermanagh and South Tyrone, died suddenly and unexpectedly, leaving his seat in Westminster vacant. The republican leadership on the outside hatched a plan. They were forever getting dismissed by political opponents for not having a mandate, but if they stood Sands as a candidate in the resultant by-election and won, they could demonstrate to the British government and the wider world that the hunger strikers’ demands had popular support in the community.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-freeA bittersweet victory
On 9 April 1981, Bobby Sands won the election with over 30,000 votes – almost 10,000 more than Thatcher had won in her home constituency of Finchley in the 1979 UK general election. The victory provided the republican movement with a powerful morale boost and demolished the British government’s argument that they had no support.
But in spite of Sands’ victory, along with international pressure from the Irish diaspora abroad and others around the world, Thatcher refused to budge. On May 5, 1981, Bobby Sands died of starvation 66 days into his fast at 27 years of age. Over 100,000 mourners lined his cortege in one of the largest political funerals in Irish history.
International outcry
Sands’ death led to international outcry at the treatment of the prisoners and Thatcher’s intransigence in meeting their demands. Critics pointed out that as members of a guerrilla army operating in contested territory, republican prisoners were entitled under the Geneva Convention to be recognised as prisoners of war. One letter, sent from one Bernard Sanders (then-mayor of Burlington, Vermont in the US), stated:
We are deeply disturbed by your government’s unwillingness to stop the abuse, humiliation and degrading treatment of the Irish prisoners now on strike in Northern Ireland…
We ask you to end your intransigent policy towards the prisoners before the reputation of the English people for fair play and simple decency is further damaged in the eyes of the people of Vermont and the United States.
In October 1981, the British government eventually conceded most of the prisoners’ demands; but not before nine more republican hunger strikers had followed Sands to the grave.
This episode perhaps shows more than any other the utter depravity, brutality, ruthlessness and lack of humanity that lurked within the twisted soul of Margaret Thatcher. All but one of the men were under 30 years old and left behind grieving mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters and, in some cases, children – all for the ‘crime’ of fighting back against foreign oppression and discrimination in their own country.
Sands’ brave sacrifice stands as an example that all anti-imperialists and advocates of justice can aspire to. But it also serves as a reminder of Thatcher’s sordid legacy of death and destruction in Ireland.
Featured image via Wikimedia / Flickr – Levi Ramishvili
This article was originally published on 5th May 2020.
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Bobby Sands was a terrorist! It´s funny how the following tiny detail is missing from this article:
“In 1972, Sands joined the Provisional IRA.[15] He was arrested and charged in October 1972 with possession of four handguns found in the house where he was staying. Sands was convicted in April 1973, sentenced to five years imprisonment, and released in April 1976.
Upon his release, he returned to his family home in West Belfast and resumed his active role in the Provisional IRA. Sands and Joe McDonnell planned the October 1976 bombing of the Balmoral Furniture Company in Dunmurry”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Sands
I would hold Maggie the Milk Snatcher for crushing the Mners´Strike, causing mass unemployment and replace fathers by the Dept. of Social Security, giving rise to single mothers, and a whole class of criminals who were, have been, and are being raised by single mothers.
BUT, not for jailing a terrorist bomber!!!!!
But fairs fair, all Sands did was plant the odd bomb, while the British government forced him to wear a prison uniform in a prison. Clearly Sands is the real victim here.
Let’s not forget the innocent civilians that lowlife scumbags like Sands murdered. The ‘journalists’ at The Canary are pond life in their approach to the IRA and their murderous members. The likes of Sands deserved the gallows. To celebrate these people despite events such as Warrington is despicable. And this mindset is why the Corbynista/Momentum rabble will never, ever even sniff the seat of power.
It seems we have a right group of racists and reactionaries. The IRA was fighting a war on behalf of the nationalist population of northern Ireland against the British. As such he should have had political status.
The hypocrisy of your 3 correspondents knows no limit. Of course the British criminalised Sands, just as they have criminalised all those who in the colonies fought the British occupation. And let your racist correspondents remember, Ireland is Britain’s oldest colony.
Ireland was partitioned by Britain in 1922 against the wishes of the people of Ireland who in 1918 had given an overall majority, Ireland wide, to Sinn Fein. Ireland was divided by the use of force of arms and Republicans have never accepted that decision.
If Sands had been a criminal it is unlikely that the people of Fermanagh and Tyrone would have elected him to parliament or that Gerry Adams, the commander of the Belfast brigade of the IRA would have been elected repeatedly in West Belfast.
All 3 of your correspondents are steeped in British chauvinism. Who gave the Brits the right to define someone as a ‘terrorist’?
Yes Warrington was a tragedy but your correspondent fails to mention how many Warrington’s there were in Iraq. Was Blair and Bush hanged for their crimes? Unfortunately in every war there are innocent victims but at least the IRA gave warnings of their bombs unlike the British and USA.
‘the British criminalised Sands’
He criminalised himself when he joined a terrorist group that planted bombs in pubs, kidnapped tortured and murdered people, and kept their own community in line with kneecapping and beatings.
As for people wouldnt have voted for him if he was a criminal, what planet are you on? Never heard of Trump? Duterte? Bolsonaro? Erdogan? Bob Kerrey became senator despite the massacre at Thang Phong. Your argument is hollow.
“Warrington was a tragedy”. No. It was a crime, a deliberate act to kill as many civilians as possible. That and its many similar acts of violence place the IRA, including Bobby Sands, in the same category as the My Lai murderers, Blair/Bush for invading Iraq and the CIA for, well, everything. Just because Sands and the IRA had popularity amongst some – but probably not most – Irish Catholics who wanted a united Ireland does not justify their murderous actions against civilians. Has the IRA apologised any more than the Tories have?
I welcome the Canary reminding us of this momentous episode, and producing a narrative which stands with the oppressed not the oppressors, the colonised not the colonisers – we certainly won’t get that perspective from UK mainstream media. I ask the Canary not to be deterred from its work by hostile commentary .
When the oppressed start kneecapping young boys, you know their cause has been corrupted. Do you really support the violence against ordinary people that the IRA conducted for decades? It’s no wonder they never won majority support amongst Catholic people.
Letting him die was one of the few morally decent things that Thatcher did. Sands and others tried moral blackmail as an adjunct to the IRAs murderous campaign and fascistic gangsterism. The attempt failed.
The comments above, Annie excepted, are a good example of the backwardness of the British working class. According to Keltus, letting Sands die was one of the few morally decent things Thatcher did.
Desert Fox goes one further and blames single parents for criminality thus echoing the arguments of the eugenicists, whom Hitler so admired, that feckless women were unfit to bring up children.
Dianesrightshoe would have hanged Bobby Sands on account of the innocent civilians who were killed. Perhaps she would have hanged Tony Blair for the thousands of innocent civilians? I doubt it.
Backwardness politically is also accompanied by stupidity and your contributors have that in abundance. However I prefer the honest comment of an astute member of the ruling class, Thatcher’s first Foreign Secretary Lord Carrington, who said that one person’s freedom fighter was another person’s terrorist. It is something the fools above seem incapable of understanding.
Yes of course, FROM A BRITISH STANDPOINT, Bobby Sands was a ‘terrorist’. Just as Israel classifies anyone who opposes them militarily as a terrorist. However no amount of Israeli violence qualifies in that regard. The same with the British Army. They murdered and massacred without any condemnation. They supplied weapons and intelligence to the Loyalist terror gangs who deliberately murdered innocent Catholics whereas the IRA and INLA attacked members of the army and the UDR and Police, i.e, armed members of the British state not Protestants because they were Protestant.
Yes of course Warrington and Birmingham were tragedies. Without doubt. But there has never been a war without innocent casualties. How many did we and the Americans kill in Iraq, not only direct warfare but through sanctions? 1 million? certainly hundreds of thousands yet Blair is treated as a god by the Guardian. The hypocrisy seeps out.
The Maquis, the French Resistance were also termed terrorists by the Nazis. And from the Nazi viewpoint they were right. Nonetheless most reasonable people would see them as heroes fighting an unjust occupation.
Britain never had any right to be in Ireland nor to employ unionist thugs to keep the taigs (Catholics) down. Britain was in Ireland by might not right. That is why the IRA existed. That is why they had massive support in the nationalist ghettos. British rule in Ireland was never accepted by the Irish people and thus there was no neutral rule of law. Bobby Sands died, not because he was a criminal robbing a post office but because he took up arms against that state.
To British bigots like those above there is never a right to oppose British colonialism. Those who do are ‘terrorists’.
Keltus, Bamforth, Dianesrightshoe and the rest are unable to accept that Britain had and has no more right to be in Ireland than it did in Kenya. But no doubt those who opposed the British in Kenya were also terrorists according to the bigots above