Today’s Brexit wobble by Theresa May shows what happens when the BBC does its job

Theresa May
Support us and go ad-free

During a press conference on 5 March, Theresa May lashed out at a BBC journalist for asking a simple question about Brexit. That it was so easy to force the prime minister off script shows the scope the BBC has to help hold power to account. If only it would do its job more often.

Being the BBC

BBC chief political correspondent Vicki Young didn’t expect to become the news today. But her simple question about Brexit triggered a newsworthy response from Theresa May. The PM was taking questions from the press after a speech on housing. Alongside her housing question, Young raised Confederation of British Industry concerns about how the UK’s financial services sector would access European markets post-Brexit. And the PM lost her cool, replying tartly:

Being the BBC, of course, you were always going to get Brexit into the question.

The prime minister then admitted forgetting Young’s housing question entirely.

A polished performance it was not.

May’s comments triggered widespread surprise from establishment journalists.

And as viewers pointed out, this was a souring of the usual cordial relations between the BBC and the Conservative government.

But what the exchange did show is how easy it is to rattle the PM and disrupt her usual routine of filling air time with non-answers. If only BBC journalists would do so more frequently, or engage opposing guests capable of doing so.

We want power held to account

In a world full of partisan media outlets (The Canary among them), there is a central role for the BBC in adjudicating the battle of ideas. But that depends upon a level of objectivity which the corporation has been failing to uphold. Despite the wailings of right-wingers about the ‘leftie BBC‘, the overwhelming weight of evidence proves otherwise. A recent study by the Media Reform Coalition concluded that the BBC has shown clear bias against Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. But the bigger picture is even worse. A content analysis by Cardiff University found BBC coverage after the financial crisis heavily dominated by financial services figures. They concluded:

Results indicated that political and financial elites dominated coverage. The consequence was that the news reproduced a very limited range of opinion on the implications and potential strategies for deficit reduction. The view that Britain was in danger of being abandoned by its international creditors with serious economic consequences was unchallenged and repeatedly endorsed by journalists. Despite their limited record of success during recessions, austerity policies dominated discussion of possible solutions to the rise in the deficit. This research thus raises questions about impartiality and the watchdog role of public service journalism.

But why?

Speaking at a Real Media event on ‘Media bias and big political events’, the University of Glasgow’s Greg Philo explained the apparent shift to the right of BBC News coverage. He traced it back to the rise of Blairism and the invasion of Iraq. From then on, conversations in parliament were based on a near-universal acceptance of neoliberalism, in both domestic and foreign policy. And as the BBC saw its role as providing balanced reporting of those views, it failed to make space for broader discussions. As Philo explains:

The BBC, which is supposed to be public – supposed to be representing a range of views, interprets its rubric as being simply to report what goes on in parliament. So if parliament is substantially to the right, then the BBC sees no reason to report that section of the population which are on the left. Even if there is a huge number of people who want left-wing policies in some areas.

What viewers want and need from the BBC is simple. They need the BBC to do its job, and to fulfil its number one public purpose as stated in its charter; “to provide impartial news and information to help people understand and engage with the world around them”.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

– Read and support other independent media outlets:

Another Angry Voice, Media DiversifiedNovara MediaCorporate WatchRed PepperNew InternationalistCommon SpaceMedia LensBella CaledoniaVox PoliticalEvolve PoliticsReal MediaReel NewsSTRIKE! magazineThe Bristol CableThe Meteor, The SkwawkboxSalford StarThe Ferret.

Featured image via screengrab

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed