Amid the latest attacks on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, there’s one important announcement from his party that you may have missed.
Her announcement suggested prioritising global justice over charity, with a “truly feminist” approach.
Justice vs charity
The shadow secretary said:
The Tories want aid to be about charity, not global justice. They want to defend the way the world is now, with all its injustices and vested interests, rather than transform it.
The Canary asked the Conservative Party for a response to that comment, but had received nothing by the time of publication.
Osamor also insisted that it’s:
time to wrest back control from the aid industry and put power back in the hands of people and communities.
And she stressed that Labour would:
put an end to an incoherent policy that means British-made bombs continue to fall on Yemen while we are sending £200m of aid to that very country.
Today I launched a new plan for government. Labour wants a world that works for the many, not the few. pic.twitter.com/rPDW7mzQda
— Kate Osamor (@KateOsamor) March 26, 2018
As Shadow Secretary of State for International Development, today I launch my plan to transform the global economy, tackle systemic inequality, poverty and climate change: with a feminist approach. #WorldForTheMany pic.twitter.com/jjWnFZUPGn
— Kate Osamor (@KateOsamor) March 26, 2018
In the policy paper, Labour says [pdf, p7]:
To serve the twin goals of reducing poverty and inequality, Labour will deliver on five key and connected priorities:
1. A fairer global economy
2. A global movement for public services
3. A feminist approach to development
4. Building peace and preventing conflict
5. Action for climate justice and ecology
Deal with the structural problems
But this latest paper is not the first time Labour has called for structural change rather than sticking plasters.
In 2017, Labour MP David Lammy wrote:
A 5% rise in developing countries’ share of world exports would generate $350bn – seven times as much as they receive in aid
And he added that:
profit-shifting by multinational companies costs developing nations $100bn a year that they could spend on education, infrastructure and public services.
Profit-shifting or ‘transfer pricing’ is trade between two financial entities that are part of the same multinational group. Corporations then manipulate internal payments in order to avoid paying tax. Meanwhile, African countries lose an estimated £40bn a year in illegal outflows and price manipulation.
Lammy advocated allowing local companies and public bodies to gain control of their own resources, rather than the current situation where:
we silently acquiesce to global corporations’ asset-stripping of poorer nations.
“He who feeds you, controls you.”
He who feeds you, controls you.
Sankara opposed foreign aid, along with the financial assistance of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. He oversaw an impressive increase in schooling, healthcare, and infrastructure in Burkina Faso – until his assassination and replacement with a pro-Western austerity regime.
If the predatory behaviour of global corporations and rich states stopped, developing countries wouldn’t need aid. Currently, corporations essentially profit from poverty and then give a small amount of money back as ‘charity’. And talk of aid obscures any discussion of institutional inequality or injustice.
So Labour and Kate Osamor are right. In order to achieve lasting relief for the world’s population, we need to address the structural problems, and truly “put power back in the hands of people and communities”.
Featured image via Sophie Brown/Wikimedia Commons
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?