Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism
Jeremy Corbyn explains how Theresa May makes policy. The phrase is going to stick.
As the country digested Theresa May’s decision to bomb Syria, Jeremy Corbyn spoke about it on The Andrew Marr show.
#corbyn: ‘this is policy made up by twitter’ and even #marr says, ‘we’re not in favour of that’ pic.twitter.com/YsZTup83AA
— jo (@jo55adams) April 15, 2018
Continue reading below...
Criticising her decision not to recall parliament to vote on the strikes, the Labour leader said the PM appeared:
more interested in following Donald Trump’s lead than anything else. This is policy made up by Twitter.
Marr acknowledged the point, saying:
We’re not in favour of that.
Corbyn’s explanation of the government’s policy ‘strategy’ came after Donald Trump tweeted in the lead up to the strikes:
Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria. Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and “smart!” You shouldn’t be partners with a Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 11, 2018
The prime minister did not distance herself from this rhetoric. She tied her colours to Trump’s mast instead of recalling parliament.
But Corbyn also called for a war powers act on the show, which would ensure parliament gets a say in military action in future. He said:
What we need in this country is something more robust, like a war powers act, so that governments do get held to account by parliament for what they do in our name.
Public response
Many people, like Corbyn, also opposed the strikes and took to social media to express that opposition.
Some people highlighted that we should take refugees instead of dropping more bombs. This was a point made brilliantly by comic, David Schneider.
An official reminder of what’s an appropriate response to “overwhelming humanitarian necessity”.
APPROPRIATE
BombingNOT APPROPRIATE
Taking in refugees https://t.co/3K4mRQeuZv— David Schneider (@davidschneider) April 14, 2018
Government: “We were all moved by the terrible suffering caused to people in Syria by bombs”
“So you’ll take in some refugees?”
Govt: “Hah! Get out of here! We’ll just drop more bombs” pic.twitter.com/feDaqxVz3M
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) April 14, 2018
May’s government announced in 2017 that it would close the Dubs scheme after only accepting 350 children. This would have granted asylum to thousands of child refugees. And yet here we are again – firing missiles with no clear plan and no apparent desire to do anything about the refugee crisis.
Theresa May claims to care about children.
Yet her govt scrapped the Dubs amendment for child refugees.Theresa May claims to care about the NHS.
Yet her govt would rather fire missiles at £800,000 a pop risking civilian life, than fund the NHS.#SyriaStrikes— Dr Lauren Gavaghan (@DancingTheMind) April 14, 2018
Corbyn captures the public mood
Corbyn’s performance on Marr resonated for many. Because it gave people a welcome break from the hawkish backslapping seen elsewhere.
The Labour leader’s plan to introduce a War Powers Act would ensure major decisions like this one on Syria are taken by parliament. This would be a fair way to ensure British people get a say on matters committed in their name, and maybe put a break on the constant rush to war.
Get Involved!
– Support Help Refugees UK.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via screengrab
Since you're here ...
We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.
Support