• Disrupting Power Since 2015
  • Donate
  • Login
Thursday, May 15, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

A Scottish MP asks the question on everyone’s lips during the parliamentary debate on Syria

Ed Sykes by Ed Sykes
16 April 2018
in Global, Trending, UK
Reading Time: 3 mins read
170 2
A A
0
Home Global
320
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On 16 April, Theresa May faced questions from MPs about the 14 April airstrikes on Syria, which the prime minister undertook without parliamentary approval. And a Scottish MP asked the question on the lips of everyone who opposed the military intervention.

Glasgow Central MP Alison Thewliss spoke about roughly how much the government’s Syrian mission was likely to have cost. And with this in mind, she asked:

How much money is the prime minister willing to invest in winning the peace in Syria and rebuilding?

8 Storm Shadow Missiles cost £6,320,000
Deploying an RAF Torndado GR4 reportedly costs £35,000 per plane per hour.
I asked the Prime Minister how much she is willing to invest in building peace in #Syria.
https://t.co/VxkdUCgC5A

— Alison Thewliss (@alisonthewliss) April 16, 2018

The Scottish National Party has called the current approach of May’s government “anti-democratic”, insisting that a parliamentary debate should have preceded any military action.

May’s response

Theresa May responded to Thewliss by saying the UK had invested significantly in Syrian refugees.

Labour MP Alison McGovern, however, insisted that the government’s commitment to accept 20,000 displaced people by 2020 was “not good enough”, and that it amounted to just 4% of the number of people Germany has taken in.

The prime minister also said:

We acted because the Syrian regime was using chemical weapons, [and] had done so on a number of occasions…

But Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon has argued that the airstrikes were “launched before any evidence had been presented by chemical weapons inspectors”, and felt “more like the latest act in a power play between presidents Trump and Putin than any serious attempt to resolve the conflict in Syria”.

Also, regarding previous allegations, even current US defence secretary James Mattis admitted in February that his country could not confirm that the Syrian regime had used the chemical weapon sarin on its citizens, saying “we do not have evidence of it”.

“Legally questionable”, and morally hypocritical

The assertion that Britain must oppose crimes against humanity abroad makes sense. But it makes less sense when employed selectively. Theresa May isn’t suggesting attacking Saudi Arabia for bombing Yemen to bits, for example. Nor is she rallying against Burma over its alleged genocide against the Rohingya people, against Turkey over its anti-Kurdish war crimes, or against Israel over its brutal treatment of Palestinians. If anything, May has been cosying up to anti-democratic regimes and helping to seal arms deals with them.

But aside from being morally hypocritical, Britain’s airstrikes on Syria are also – as Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said – “legally questionable”. In fact, international lawyers believe they are “illegal… acts of aggression”.

“The Prime Minister is accountable to this parliament and not to the whims of the US President.”

Jeremy Corbyn calls for greater scrutiny on military action and says the strikes were “legally questionable”, while Theresa May says she took action to ease humanitarian suffering. pic.twitter.com/0eDnO4USvO

— Channel 4 News (@Channel4News) April 16, 2018

Rather than more war, how about building peace?

Following international legal procedures and waiting for firm evidence may not be a quick process. But that doesn’t mean bypassing such procedures is a good idea.

If we want to lead the way as a nation, we need to stop contributing to human suffering by selling arms to anti-democratic regimes. We need to stop treating war crimes differently depending on who’s behind them. And we need to show that we respect international law.

Maybe if we lead by example – and invest in peace instead of war – we can regain the respect we’ve lost internationally by consistently acting like a lapdog to US war hawks.

Get Involved!

– Write to Theresa May and your MP to demand an evidence-based foreign policy that complies with international law.

Featured image via screenshot

Share128Tweet80
Previous Post

The DWP and HMRC just ‘betrayed’ hundreds of their own workers

Next Post

Government ‘accidentally’ targeted citizens, ignored their pleas, then deported them

Next Post
Windrush affair - A staff member says to Amber Rudd "Are you sure these people we're deporting aren't citizens?" Rudd responds: "Would I be sniffing glue if I wasn't?"

Government 'accidentally' targeted citizens, ignored their pleas, then deported them

Theresa May looking nervous

Today is a very important day but Theresa May is probably hoping you don't notice

Robert Fisk and Douma Mosque in Syria (2012)

A reporter finally entered the ‘chemical attack’ site in Syria. What he found is extraordinary.

Former First Sea Lord Alan West on BBC news

An ex-British Navy chief raises 'alarm bells' about the government's Syria story live on the BBC

Disabled people are facing discrimination on public transport

Secret filming has exposed a scandal for disabled people

Trump has just sparked another major national security row
Analysis

Trump just sparked another major national security row – not that he cares

by Steve Topple
15 May 2025
The far-right's latest attack on Jeremy Corbyn is its most preposterous yet - with Lee Anderson leading the charge
Analysis

The far-right’s latest attack on Jeremy Corbyn is its most preposterous yet

by James Wright
15 May 2025
Starmer Rwanda deportation plan
Analysis

Just when you thought Starmer couldn’t stoop any lower – he does this

by Ed Sykes
15 May 2025
Jewish anti-Zionists IJAN respond to police ban on protest against Israeli ambassador
Analysis

Jewish anti-Zionists IJAN respond to police ban on protest against Israeli ambassador

by Ed Sykes
15 May 2025
Social Media Activism: How Grassroots Movements Are Gaining Power Online
Lifestyle

Social Media Activism: How Grassroots Movements Are Gaining Power Online

by Nathan Spears
15 May 2025
  • Contact
  • About & FAQ
  • Get our Daily News Email
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

The Canary is owned and run by independent journalists and volunteers, NOT offshore billionaires.

You can write for us, or support us by making a regular or one-off donation.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion

© 2023 Canary - Worker's co-op.

Before you go, have you seen...?

Trump has just sparked another major national security row
Analysis
Steve Topple

Trump just sparked another major national security row – not that he cares

The far-right's latest attack on Jeremy Corbyn is its most preposterous yet - with Lee Anderson leading the charge
Analysis
James Wright

The far-right’s latest attack on Jeremy Corbyn is its most preposterous yet

Starmer Rwanda deportation plan
Analysis
Ed Sykes

Just when you thought Starmer couldn’t stoop any lower – he does this

Jewish anti-Zionists IJAN respond to police ban on protest against Israeli ambassador
Analysis
Ed Sykes

Jewish anti-Zionists IJAN respond to police ban on protest against Israeli ambassador

ADVERTISEMENT
Lifestyle
Nathan Spears

Social Media Activism: How Grassroots Movements Are Gaining Power Online

Travel
Nathan Spears

Best Destinations In Spain For A Couples Holiday

Travel
Nathan Spears

Surviving Long Layovers: A Frequent Traveller’s Guide