• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 4, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Peter Hitchens takes Andrew Neil apart over Syria bias on BBC This Week

Kerry-Anne Mendoza by Kerry-Anne Mendoza
19 June 2022
in Global, Trending, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
165 8
A A
0
Home Global
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

It’s not often a guest gets the better of BBC This Week host Andrew Neil. But viewers seem to agree that Peter Hitchens achieved that this week. During a segment on Syria, Hitchens took apart Neil’s arguments with clinical, rather than military, precision.

It’s not often that the left finds itself in agreement with Peter Hitchens. But support of his stance on Syria does not mean universal endorsement of Hitchens’ other opinions.

Starting pistols

During his introduction to the segment, Neil asserts that many people have blamed Bashar al-Assad’s government for a chemical attack in Douma, Syria. And he says that US/UK/French airstrikes took out “chemical weapons facilities” in the country as a result. Both of these assertions are as yet unproven by international agencies outside of the foreign powers behind the airstrikes. Hitchens makes this point in his own introduction: that normally sceptical journalists and politicians become giddy jingoists over military interventions. As he puts it:

We all know the old cliché, that truth is the first casualty of war. But how often do we recognise that we are ourselves to blame for this?

In normal times, wise people doubt the words of governments and suspect propaganda. But when the jet engines begin to roar, they believe atrocity stories. They demand that we must go out and bomb somebody.

Anyone with any doubt is denounced as a wicked apologist for the undoubted monster Assad…

Hitchens concludes that, after reading the reports of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), he is still waiting for a justification for military action.

Showdown

On the This Week sofa, former Labour home secretary Alan Johnson and disgraced former Conservative frontbencher Priti Patel recycled pro-war soundbites. Hitchens asks if either of them can name the Syrian rebels in Douma at the time of the attacks.

Patel confesses she can’t, while Johnson attempts (quite embarrassingly) to repeat their name as Hitchens reveals it. The answer is Jaish al-Islam (The Army of Islam), a fundamentalist group that aims to replace the Assad regime with Sharia Law. Their methods of warfare include putting opponents and their families in 100 cages in 2015, and alleged responsibility for a chemical weapons attack in 2016. Hitchens rightly asserts that Patel and Johnson shouldn’t speak with such conviction without knowing these basic details.

Finally, Neil attempts to dismiss Hitchens as a conspiracy crank. He misquotes his Mail on Sunday blog to argue that Hitchens speculated the West faked the attack. Those who viewed the blog know this is untrue. Hitchens argued that non-government forces in Syria had an incentive to falsely implicate Assad in chemical attacks, to drive Western intervention. While Hitchens points out Neil’s error, attributing it to BBC This Week researchers, Neil does not correct himself. He makes several personally derisive remarks to Hitchens and closes the segment.

Reaction

But viewers and Hitchens were not about to let that stand. People from the left and right took Neil and the BBC to task for misrepresenting Hitchens’s views and writings on Syria:

https://twitter.com/cjsnowdon/status/987107114224177152

@bbcthisweek Im no fan of @ClarkeMicah but @afneil clearly didnt read the blog. It's quite clear that Hitchens is talking about rebel forces faking future attacks, and not US, UK and France. pic.twitter.com/xHhXraqp1F

— Chris Hoare (@chrisdhoare) April 19, 2018

https://twitter.com/alexnunns/status/987111920313556993

A bad night for Brillo.

 

CORRECTION: This article was updated on 23 April at 14:57 to clarify that Neil was reporting the words of others when suggesting Assad was responsible for the attack.

Get Involved!

– You can make a complaint to the BBC here.

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

– Read and support other independent media outlets:

Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Red Pepper, New Internationalist, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, The Skwawkbox, Salford Star, The Ferret.

Featured image via screenshot

Tags: BBCSyria
Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

David Lammy demolishes the government’s response to the Windrush scandal on Channel 4 News

Next Post

A groundbreaking new book is about to change the way we view mental health therapy

Next Post
A new book is offering a radical therapy for mental health issues

A groundbreaking new book is about to change the way we view mental health therapy

The three sisters in the latest production of Beasts

The true story of three sisters' deaths is brought to life in a devastating play

Owen Jones

Owen Jones dishes the dirt on the UK media, leaving corporate journalists fuming

The children from the village of the damned saying in unison "No we aren't"

Journos respond to claim they're governed by cultish, private school ideology

Jeremy Corbyn

The viral tweet where Jeremy Corbyn predicts the Windrush scandal in 2014

west bank
Analysis

Israel destroys vital fruit and veg market in West Bank

by Charlie Jaay
4 June 2026
Darren Jones
Skwawkbox

Starmeroid would-be leader Darren Jones cosied up to Mandelson

by Skwawkbox
4 June 2026
Trans rights activists hold placard
Analysis

Trans code debate shows some MPs remain allies of queer community

by Alex/Rose Cocker
4 June 2026
Composite image showing author Taj Ali with book Come what may, we’re here to stay: The story of South Asian resistance in Britain over a b/w aerial photo of Luton
News

The story of South Asian resistance in the UK by Taj Ali

by The Canary
4 June 2026
Open AI CEO Sam Altman with a red line behind him
Trending

Companies abandon AI as prices skyrocket

by Willem Moore
4 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart