Author Alex Nunns dismantles the myth of BBC impartiality in a brutal number crunch

The BBC Sunday Politics logo
Support us and go ad-free

Alex Nunns, author of The Candidate, has dismantled the myth of BBC impartiality with cold, hard facts.


For the past year, Nunns has recorded the guests on BBC Sunday Politics‘ panel of experts, categorising them as either “right”, “centre” or “left”. And his findings are shocking:

The odd error

Nunns did make the odd mistake in his lengthy quest. For example, on 16 July 2017, he tweeted:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

However, that didn’t inhibit his overall argument. Because actually the Sun’s political editor Tom Newton Dunn sat in for Julia Hartley-Brewer.

Again, on 10 December 2017, he tweeted:

In fact, journalist Isabel Oakeshott replaced Toby Young; a like-for-like replacement, I’m sure we can all agree.

The list

The list of guests with the most appearances on the show makes for scandalous reading:

So the Sun’s political editor has appeared on 20 shows in comparison to just three appearances for the leading “left” guests. This is so imbalanced that it conjures images of a young child and their father playing on a see-saw.

Nunns admits that balance has improved slightly recently:

But the numbers still fall way short of balance:

Centre-left and left are the same, right?

Some have criticised Nunns for his decision to class some centre-left panellists as centrists:

But Nunns explains why the idea that slightly left-of-centre panellists represent the left is dangerous:

And seeing centrist panellists as ‘left wing’ dictates what is acceptable:

Typically, those in the centre ground argue for change that works within the status quo. Whereas those on the left want to change the status quo.

Therefore, excluding ‘left’ voices from the panel means it doesn’t reflect the electorate as a whole:

But portraying centrist viewpoints as representative of ‘the left’ does maintain the myth of impartiality.


Nunns’ figures provide indisputable evidence of what many have been arguing for a long time. That the BBC gives disproportionate space to views that affirm the establishment and avoids real left-wing voices.

One of its flagship political debates has had 53% right-wing panellists in the last year compared with only 10% from the left.

How do you defend that?

Get Involved!

– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via BBC iPlayer


Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed