The BBC was too late deleting a tweet that spoke volumes about its climate change reporting

BBC logo
Fréa Lockley

On 24 July, Prof Stephen Belcher appeared on BBC Newsnight. As the Met Office’s chief scientist, he gave an expert opinion about the reasons behind soaring temperatures in Europe and around the world. But after the broadcast, the BBC tweeted:

“The heatwave that we’ve got is probably part of natural cycles in the weather” – The Chief Scientist at the Met Office, Stephen Belcher, explains the significance of this summer’s heatwave.

Although it subsequently deleted the tweet, it was too little, too late. The BBC needs to raise its game in reporting on climate change.


Belcher’s actual analysis on Newsnight was nuanced. When asked if current global temperatures were the “new normal”, he said:

The heatwave that we’ve got is probably part of natural cycles in the weather… but it’s superimposed on this background of global warming, and that’s what’s elevating our temperatures

And the Newsnight segment gave a fair platform to climate-change experts. But in a now-deleted tweet, the BBC only reported half of Belcher’s opening analysis on Twitter, presenting the clip with the line:

The heatwave that we’ve got is probably part of natural cycles in the weather

As many have been quick to point out, the initial tweet was highly problematic. Some compared the BBC to America’s Fox News, which persistently misreports on the impact of global warming and climate change:


Viewers pointed out why – despite the deletion – this was a serious error:

Others reminded the BBC that, in 2017, it broke Ofcom broadcasting rules when “climate sceptic” ex-chancellor Nigel Lawson appeared on Radio 4. And in 2014, the BBC had to answer a complaint after it failed to challenge Lawson’s views on climate change adequately on the Today programme.

As The Canary has previously reported, there have been vital and valid reasons to challenge the BBC‘s climate change coverage:

To encourage climate action in the UK requires a change in the way the BBC presents evidence on climate. As Dr David Robert Grimes emphasises in a 2016 article, impartiality is a crucial part of journalism. However, current reporting on climate change shows bias against the scientific consensus. Real balance would require 97% of coverage to favour scientists who recognise climate change.

Others have gone further and stated that frequent lack of balanced reporting actually makes the BBC complicit:

While the BBC has made climate-change reporting mistakes in the past, this Newsnight report should have been something to celebrate. The BBC tackled one of the planet’s most pressing issues and gave climate-change experts a fair platform. But it then completely undermined this, with a misleading and inaccurate tweet. Tick-tock BBC: time is literally running out.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Tim Loudon/Flickr

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed