On 24 July, Tower Hamlets Council in east London approved a controversial redevelopment plan, to the fury of campaigners and local residents:
The social cleansers of Poplar.
This is happening in 2018, wholesale transfer of social assets into hands of private developers.
— Rab Harling (@RabHarling) July 25, 2018
Chrisp Street Market
We are working class people, Chrisp Street Market [is] for working class people. We want to keep [it] as it is.
The Canary previously reported that:
10 years ago, the housing association Poplar HARCA took over management of both the market and the housing situated around it from Tower Hamlets council.
During this time, local residents, traders and campaigners have accused Poplar HARCA of deliberately running down the area, with the aim of forcing the local community out.
However, Poplar HARCA denies this accusation. A spokesperson told The Canary:
The scheme is a partnership between Poplar HARCA and Telford Homes plc. The market stalls are now, and will continue to be, operated by the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
We have listened closely to local traders, residents and shoppers over the past eight years. They are all vital to the success of the Market, and together we will create a thriving town centre by adding new retail, amenities and desperately needed new homes to the best of what’s already here.
The listening doesn’t now stop. We will liaise closely with everyone to ensure all shops and market stalls can continue trading throughout the works, and disruption is kept to a minimum.
But the council meeting itself was marred with controversies:
At Tower Hamlets Planning Meeting on Chrisp street market tonight. Lots of no supporters shut out. Lots of yes supporters shut in. Robber Barons Poplar Harca are AstroTurfing their plans to approval. While backgrounding a large and vocal crowd of unhappy traders + residents. pic.twitter.com/mYZlA4OlIb
— Vile Arrogance (@VArrogance) July 24, 2018
Some campaigners accused Tower Hamlets Council of being very selective about who they let into the meeting:
LBTH stopped majority BME traders from attending last night's #ChrispStreetMarket decision, while letting maj white HARCA+Telford get all their stooges, sockpuppets and employees who set up fraudulent petitions etc in. More #ethniccleansing from LBTH, after #RobinHoodGardens too https://t.co/uEHYZpIPN7
— Cockney Campaign (@cockneycampaign) July 25, 2018
And council staff threw out campaigner Terry McGrenera “for shouting out comments questioning the amount of social/affordable housing”.
— Rachael Burford (@RachaelBurford) July 24, 2018
A spokesperson for Tower Hamlets Council told The Canary:
The Chrisp Street Market planning application was considered by the council’s Strategic Development Committee on Tuesday evening.
Extensive consultation took place as part of the application process and all the responses were taken into account.
In addition, the applicant held a series of engagement events involving residents and stallholders. A number of petitions, both for and against the proposals, were sent in.
The report considered by the committee recommended that, subject to any alternative direction from the Mayor of London, the application be approved.
The meeting heard representations for and against the proposed development and considered a range of relevant planning issues before coming to a decision.
The committee voted unanimously to grant planning permission. Votes on planning decisions are a matter for individual councillors.
Leader of the Save Chrisp Street campaign Rab Harling told The Canary that Poplar HARCA’s proposal:
in reality almost completely removes any social housing from the market, replacing it with a small number of “affordable” homes and units for part-ownership.
Harling went on to describe how the Tower Hamlets Labour council has allowed:
the wholesale social and ethnic cleansing of an entire community in order to “change the social mix” of the local population.
And other campaigners agree with Harling’s analysis:
Last night in Tower Hamlets, @UKLabour voted to allow Poplar Harca to hand over £2 Billion of assets over to a private developer, with the intention of socially cleansing Chrisp Street Market, where there'll be no more than a handful of "affordable" homes, & 500 for private sale. https://t.co/0psxjMSGWT
— PplRism (@PplRism) July 25, 2018
As do local residents:
So for 398 private and less that 1/10 of that – 39 for social housing?? So this is basically all going to be private and out of reach for most of the existing residents around chrisp street
— 🌝 (@shahedwon) July 24, 2018
Poplar Harca has had to raise the ratio of “affordable” homes to 35 per cent from 124 to 200, including 136 at social rent, 27 at ‘living rent’ and 37 shared ownership. Another 443 homes are to go on the private sale market.
There are currently 129 social homes on the estate. Poplar HARCA’s plan to increase this by just 12 seems scant reward for knocking down so many homes.
Not giving up
Ammar Hasanie, a shopkeeper in Chrisp Street Market, told the East London Advertiser that the local traders aren’t giving up:
We are going to legally challenge this decision on grounds of policy breach because there hasn’t been a ballot on demolishing the market or the housing.
But these types of decisions have unfortunately become the norm for London Labour councils:
— Biffa luddite (@biffbaffboffboo) July 24, 2018
London Labour councils are continually showing a complete disregard for the concerns of local people.
Putting private interests ahead of working-class people’s concerns is the antithesis of the labour movement. And it must stop.
– Follow the Save Chrisp Street Market Twitter for news about the campaign.
– Support housing campaigns like Focus E15, London Renters Union, Greater Manchester Housing Action, ACORN, Streets Kitchen, Balfron Social Club, Save Our Homes LS26, Ledbury Action Group, and Generation Rent.
Featured image via RabHarling.com
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?