Twitter has responded angrily after CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta had his press credentials revoked. He had been trying to ask Donald Trump about the ‘caravan‘ of refugees currently fleeing toward the US from Central America. But Trump reacted aggressively, and a White House aide attempted to grab the microphone from him. And since then, it’s all spiralled out of control.
During a press conference, Acosta asked Trump about the language he has used to describe refugees. But Trump immediately began to talk over him, saying:
That’s enough, put down the mic
Acosta refused (politely) to surrender the microphone to the “grabby Trump aide”:
The grabby Trump aide is giving off such Head Girl Energy. Footsoldiers of authoritarianism, the lot of em. pic.twitter.com/8VDRy58DsS
— Ash Sarkar (@AyoCaesar) November 8, 2018
Trump then called him a “rude, terrible person”, and said he “shouldn’t be working for CNN“.
The reporter later found himself prevented from entering the White House by secret service agents:
I’ve just been denied entrance to the WH. Secret Service just informed me I cannot enter the WH grounds for my 8pm hit
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) November 8, 2018
Following the incident, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders put out a statement on Twitter. She claimed Acosta had been banned for “placing his hands on a young woman just trying to do her job as a White House intern”. But as footage of the incident showed, this is not what happened. And Acosta responded swiftly and bluntly to this very poisonous accusation:
This is a lie. https://t.co/FastFfWych
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) November 8, 2018
Other Twitter users were also quick to point out the holes in the White House version of events:
We can all see the (non-CNN) footage. Acosta didn’t lay his hands on anyone, and Trump refused to answer questions and hurled abuse. The fake news is coming directly from you.
— Victoria Penman (@Shefpen) November 8, 2018
Everyone saw what happened. A civilized government does not physically grab a microphone from a reporter, call him a “terrible person” and ban him from the press room! If Trump can’t handle tough questions, he is not fit to be POTUS.
— Kassevy (@kassevy) November 8, 2018
As one Twitter user eloquently put it:
— DG (@libgwenchy) November 8, 2018
Even if Acosta had ‘placed his hands’ on the young woman, several Twitter users were quick to highlight the hypocrisy of the Trump administration taking the moral high ground on this issue:
Then explain why Trump praised Greg Gianforte for body slamming Ben Jacobs: "Any guy that can do a body slam, he's my kind of guy." pic.twitter.com/hqlsIUbe7n
— The Hummingbird ? (@SaysHummingbird) November 8, 2018
And lest we forget (we weren’t going to forget), Trump has quite a record when it comes to ‘placing hands’ on women:
Let's not forget, the @PressSec who now accuses @Acosta of "putting his hands on a woman" after he gently deflected her attempt to snatch a mic from his hands is the spokesperson of a man known for saying "Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything," https://t.co/3BdzmG9Ahv
— Suzanne Nossel (@SuzanneNossel) November 8, 2018
Did he grab her by the pussy, or move on her like a BITCH? B/c thats totally acceptible behavior for President Trump. He set the precedent for interacting with women. Can please address this for us, Sara, you soulless fucking troll of a human? #MAGA ??
— Sea Hulk (@Sea_Hulk) November 8, 2018
Perhaps because the footage of the incident clearly shows Acosta did not place hands on the woman, the White House press machine went on the offensive, releasing a different version of the footage. Once again, though, Twitter users – many of whom apparently have eyes and ears – were quick to contradict the ‘official’ take on the story:
White house press video versus NBC footage. It certainly does look like they've doctored it to make it look more violent. I also like how the White house one is gloomier colours to make it more sinister. pic.twitter.com/WHtufgxejK
— HappyToast ★ (@IamHappyToast) November 8, 2018
One experienced video editor tweeted a breakdown of the changes made to the footage:
1) Took @PressSec Sarah Sanders' video of briefing
2) Tinted red and made transparent over CSPAN video
3) Red motion is when they doctored video speed
4) Sped up to make Jim Acosta's motion look like a chop
5) I've edited video for 15+ years
6) The White House doctored it pic.twitter.com/q6arkYSx0V
— Rafael Shimunov ? (@rafaelshimunov) November 8, 2018
But the lengths the Trump administration will go to smearing reporters asking questions it doesn’t like is extremely sinister. What’s worse, it appears that Sanders called in the far-right conspiracy theorist cavalry to help in this crusade. The Independent noted:
Ms Sanders’ tweet came exactly two hours after the same video was shared by Paul Joseph Watson, editor-at-large of InfoWars, a far-right conspiracy theory website fronted by Trump-supporter Alex Jones.
Patterns of behaviour
It’s not news that Trump will go to great lengths to avoid difficult questions from journalists. Because in the same press conference, Trump accused reporter Yamiche Alcindor of asking a ‘racist‘ question when she asked him about his decision to call himself a “nationalist”:
WATCH: @PBS @NewsHour White House correspondent @Yamiche Alcindor today at a WH news conference asked @realdonaldtrump whether calling himself a nationalist on the campaign trail has been emboldening white nationalists. President Trump replied, "That's such a racist question." pic.twitter.com/dzrTG9Yoxn
— PBS NewsHour (@NewsHour) November 7, 2018
And he told American Urban Radio Networks‘ April Ryan repeatedly to “sit down” – ironically as she was asking questions about voter suppression. He’s also made noise about reviewing NBC‘s licence, accusing it of spreading “fake news”.
On the plus side, the National Association of Hispanic Journalists swiftly put out its backing for Acosta:
By harassing @Acosta for simply doing his job & deeming him as the 'enemy of the people', President Trump is engaging in a calculated effort of putting a target on this journalist’s back.#PressFreedom #MoreLatinosInNewshttps://t.co/AlpICrlRco pic.twitter.com/uKgT2t1ktD
— NAHJ (@NAHJ) November 7, 2018
And the White House Correspondents’ Association put out an angry statement on the unacceptable use of the US secret service to silence journalists for asking tricky questions:
WHCA statement on White House decision on credentials. pic.twitter.com/bukK7CGu2G
— WHCA (@whca) November 8, 2018
As The Canary knows all too well, the backing of unions and press associations can be a vital, make-or-break element in keeping a media that is free, fair, and able to speak out.
Rotten to the core
Sanders can insist that Trump “believes in a free press and expects and welcomes tough questions of him and his Administration” until she’s blue in the face. But pretty much anyone can clearly see the contempt with which he views journalists and reporters who disagree with him. He also can’t credibly say that he is concerned for the safety of women, or take any kind of moral high ground over men ‘placing hands’ on women. And that makes it even more sickening that a woman – Sanders – continues to stand up for him.
Journalists in the US are currently fighting the rising tide of fake news, misinformation, and propaganda – most of which comes from Trump supporters. And the attack on Acosta is just one more incident in a long line of cynical, self-serving publicity stunts from a presidency that is rotten to its core.
Thankfully, Americans aren’t falling for Trump’s propaganda machine.
– Independent journalism needs your help. Please support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via Flickr/Gage Skidmore
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.