The Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP) boss Esther McVey appears to have got away with making incorrect statements in parliament – yet again. Or if you prefer, as one campaign group put it, she can ‘lie’ and get away with it.
The DWP: charities love us!
As HuffPost reported, on Monday 5 November, work and pensions secretary McVey was speaking about Universal Credit in parliament. Facing criticism from Labour over the contentious new benefit, she claimed of Universal Credit and the DWP’s approach:
charities have been saying this department now is listening to what claimants are saying, charities are saying, MPs are saying.
Trussell Trust has said that. Gingerbread has said that. Mind have said that.
Not a good move. Because the charities she named quickly took to Twitter to kick back against her claims.
Mind did quite a thread, claiming that:
We remain clear that new #UniversalCredit regulations don’t go far enough.
Yesterday the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions @EstherMcVey1 mentioned us in a list of organisations who had recognised and welcomed changes to #UniversalCredit. We thought it was important to set the record straight. pic.twitter.com/ATZqKqLHzO
— Mind (@MindCharity) November 6, 2018
Gingerbread also got in on the thread action. It claimed McVey’s statement “does not paint the full picture”:
— Gingerbread (@Gingerbread) November 7, 2018
The Trussell Trust also kicked back:
THREAD: We’re being asked lots of Qs about what we think of #UniversalCredit today. To be clear: we use evidence from our #foodbank network to comment on the impact of policies & campaign for long-term change to protect people from hunger & poverty, & will continue to do so. 1/5 pic.twitter.com/ZvC7z9u9a9
— The Trussell Trust (@TrussellTrust) November 7, 2018
But in reality, the three charities’ statements still showed they all support Universal Credit in principle. As The Canary previously reported, many people believe the benefit needs to be completely scrapped.
So, in an attempt to not let McVey off the hook, Labour’s shadow minister for disabled people got involved.
On Monday 12 November, Marsha de Cordova asked speaker John Bercow:
Can you… advise me on how to ensure that… [McVey] corrects her statement to accurately represent the views of the charities that she mentioned?
You could almost feel the sweat dripping off Bercow. Because he basically caved in, saying:
If the secretary of states believes she has inadvertently misled the House she… should take steps to correct the record.
But it may be, I put it no more strongly, that it may be that she takes a different view of the matter. Perhaps I can say the following without fear of contradiction by any member of the House. It is not uncommon for members to interpret the facts of the matter in different ways.
We will leave it there for now.
Last week @EstherMcVey1 made a statement to the House suggesting that leading charities welcomed proposed changes to Universal Credit.@MindCharity and others quickly set the record straight. Today I asked how to ensure that she accurately represents their views in the House. pic.twitter.com/0FDJVamqvw
— Marsha de Cordova MP (@MarshadeCordova) November 12, 2018
No, really. Bercow actually said that MP’s can “interpret” “facts” in “different ways”. Take a deep breath, people. Moreover, this is not the first time she has “interpreted” “facts” about Universal Credit differently. Or to put it another way, ‘lied’.
McVey’s actions, and her seeming free pass, have shocked campaign group BENEFITS NEWS. It told The Canary:
It is clear McVey has misled Parliament, yet again.
The Institute for Government wrote about breaches of Ministerial Code not being dealt with last time Esther was caught out for lying. We very much respect the Speaker John Bercow; he is usually very fair. So we’re a little bemused as to whether he now expects McVey to apologise in the House of Commons, again.
We feel very strongly that Theresa May should sack McVey. But the trouble is the PM failed to uphold the same Ministerial Code by not sacking her previously.
The speaker of the House of Commons saying MPs can “interpret” “facts” however they want? A weak and wobbly PM letting an utterly unscrupulous work and pensions secretary keep her job? Again? Surely not…
– Follow BENEFITS NEWS on Twitter.
– Join The Canary so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?