The DWP boss just got away with ‘lying’. Again.

Esther McVey at CPC 18 and the DWP logo
Support us and go ad-free

The Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP) boss Esther McVey appears to have got away with making incorrect statements in parliament – yet again. Or if you prefer, as one campaign group put it, she can ‘lie’ and get away with it.

The DWP: charities love us!

As HuffPost reported, on Monday 5 November, work and pensions secretary McVey was speaking about Universal Credit in parliament. Facing criticism from Labour over the contentious new benefit, she claimed of Universal Credit and the DWP’s approach:

charities have been saying this department now is listening to what claimants are saying, charities are saying, MPs are saying.

Trussell Trust has said that. Gingerbread has said that. Mind have said that.

Not a good move. Because the charities she named quickly took to Twitter to kick back against her claims.

Hang on…

Mind did quite a thread, claiming that:

We remain clear that new #UniversalCredit regulations don’t go far enough.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Gingerbread also got in on the thread action. It claimed McVey’s statement “does not paint the full picture”:

The Trussell Trust also kicked back:

But in reality, the three charities’ statements still showed they all support Universal Credit in principle. As The Canary previously reported, many people believe the benefit needs to be completely scrapped.

Wait, what…?

So, in an attempt to not let McVey off the hook, Labour’s shadow minister for disabled people got involved.

On Monday 12 November, Marsha de Cordova asked speaker John Bercow:

Can you… advise me on how to ensure that… [McVey] corrects her statement to accurately represent the views of the charities that she mentioned?

You could almost feel the sweat dripping off Bercow. Because he basically caved in, saying:

If the secretary of states believes she has inadvertently misled the House she… should take steps to correct the record.

But it may be, I put it no more strongly, that it may be that she takes a different view of the matter. Perhaps I can say the following without fear of contradiction by any member of the House. It is not uncommon for members to interpret the facts of the matter in different ways.

We will leave it there for now.

No, really. Bercow actually said that MP’s can “interpret” “facts” in “different ways”. Take a deep breath, people. Moreover, this is not the first time she has “interpreted” “facts” about Universal Credit differently. Or to put it another way, ‘lied’.


McVey’s actions, and her seeming free pass, have shocked campaign group BENEFITS NEWS. It told The Canary:

It is clear McVey has misled Parliament, yet again.

The Institute for Government wrote about breaches of Ministerial Code not being dealt with last time Esther was caught out for lying. We very much respect the Speaker John Bercow; he is usually very fair. So we’re a little bemused as to whether he now expects McVey to apologise in the House of Commons, again.

We feel very strongly that Theresa May should sack McVey. But the trouble is the PM failed to uphold the same Ministerial Code by not sacking her previously.

The speaker of the House of Commons saying MPs can “interpret” “facts” however they want? A weak and wobbly PM letting an utterly unscrupulous work and pensions secretary keep her job? Again? Surely not…

Get Involved!

Follow BENEFITS NEWS on Twitter.

Join The Canary so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.

Featured image via The Telegraph – YouTube and UK government – Wikimedia

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed