Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism
You know it’s a PMQs disaster for Theresa May when Laura Kuenssberg praises Jeremy Corbyn
On 13 February, Jeremy Corbyn used his time at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) to grill Theresa May over her government’s disastrous Brexit ferry plan. Yes, the one where it awarded a multi-million-pound contract to Seaborne, a ferry company that didn’t have any ferries. The one that copied and pasted the terms and conditions on its website from a takeaway food company. And the one that ended up not even having a port to run said ferries before the government finally cancelled the contract.
It seems like Corbyn’s tactic worked. Because he even won over the BBC‘s political editor, Laura Kuenssberg.
Kuenssberg, not normally known as Corbyn’s greatest fan, tweeted:
Corbyn unusually using all questions so far on one specific issue – quite effective so far
— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) February 13, 2019
Read on...
Corbyn uses all six questions to go on ferry fiasco and go after Grayling’s scalp – May not budging but after rail problems , drones and ferries, it’s an easy target – Corbyn unusually focused on one specific issue to good effect
— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) February 13, 2019
‘Keeping a straight face’
Corbyn slammed May and transport secretary Chris Grayling over the fiasco:
Jeremy Corbyn: "How on earth can the prime minister say she has confidence in the transport secretary?"
May defends Chris Grayling and says Corbyn prefers "playing politics to acting in the national interest" #PMQs https://t.co/Nx0Xs6D6lr pic.twitter.com/hhRdhzoFfx
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) February 13, 2019
And when May replied that “due diligence” had taken place when awarding the ferry contract, Corbyn expressed surprise that she could “keep a straight face”:
Jeremy Corbyn: "I'm really impressed that the prime minister can keep a straight face while she said due diligence was carried out"
PM Theresa May defends government handling of no-deal #Brexit ferry contracts#PMQs pic.twitter.com/3ouCNThbfQ
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) February 13, 2019
Because as journalist Alberto Nardelli pointed out, there was not “a formal assessment of Seaborne financial stability”:
May said in #PMQs that due diligence was carried out on Seaborne by Deloitte, Mott MacDonald and Slaughter & May.
Deloitte: “The standard tests could not be completed on Seaborne given a lack of existing financial information due to it only being incorporated in April 2017.” pic.twitter.com/3cWoJDmk1A
— Alberto Nardelli (@AlbertoNardelli) February 13, 2019
High praise indeed
Social media users were surprised that Kuenssberg praised Corbyn:
Jesus Christ did you just say Corbyn did something good? I need to lie down
— Down the Hall (@hall_down) February 13, 2019
Laura have you had a bump on the head? Whatever next you will be praising Corbyn.
— MaggieAnn #JC4PM2019 #GTTO (@downbeat63) February 13, 2019
Although a few tweets later, Kuenssberg was back on form:
Wow… there is a lot of this about – people have been talking for many months about poss Labour breakaway – but ingredients for it are certainly there right now – whether it happens is a different Q https://t.co/HASU0ntULA
— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) February 13, 2019
It should be satire
Perhaps it’s not surprising that Kuenssberg praised Corbyn. After all, even for the government’s most ardent supporters, it’s got to be pretty hard to defend the Seaborne scandal.
If nothing else, the fact that we have a government so incompetent that it’s happy to award a contract to a ferry company with no ferries and no ports should make two things abundantly clear. This is not a government that can be trusted to negotiate Brexit. And it’s certainly not a government that we can trust to run the country.
Featured image via screengrab and screengrab
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?
Support us -
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
What’s interesting I find about Ms. Kuenssberg is not that she suddenly appears to be sincere in praise of Jeremy Corbyn over the ferry fiasco, but she is sensing the wind shift politically where things are going with an rejection of the No Deal Brexit.
She is paid to be fashionable, and follow where the wind has shifted to. No depth of perception here by any means, but telling as a windsock.