Watch Jacob Rees-Mogg defend Churchill’s support of concentration camps on Question Time

Jacob Rees-Mogg next to Grace Blakeley

The article was updated on 16 February at 09:45 to reflect the fact that Churchill supported concentration camps during the Boer War but was not responsible for them.

The refusal of some to criticise Winston Churchill has reached absurd new levels. But on the 14 February edition of the BBC‘s Question Time, Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg took it even further. Rees-Mogg attempted to defend Churchill’s support of concentration camps during the Boer War.

Rees Mogg jumps to Churchill’s defence

During an eventful episode, John McDonnell’s critical comments about Churchill were the subject of an audience question:


Few were surprised when Etonian MP Jacob Rees-Mogg sprang to Churchill’s defence. But his attempt to justify Churchill’s support of concentration camps might shock many:

The online backlash

As seen in the video, Rees-Mogg was challenged by economics commentator Grace Blakeley. Blakeley later reflected on her experience on Twitter:

And Rees-Mogg’s comments didn’t go unnoticed by others. Momentum pointed out the scale of death in the camps:

The editor of Channel 4 News was also less than impressed by Rees-Mogg’s historical accuracy:

And journalist Liam O’Hare responded to Rees-Mogg’s argument that the death rates in the camps were similar to those in Glasgow at the time:

Another Twitter user highlighted the questionable distinctions Rees-Mogg made to justify Churchill’s policy:

And responding to Rees-Mogg’s claim that Boers were interned for “their own safety” Aaron Bastani of Novara Media reminded us that:

We need to overcome the stupid simplification of this discussion

The most thoughtful take on Churchill came from the person who asked the original question:

And yet in mainstream discussion, Churchill is only spoken of in one of two ways. Firstly, those that believe Churchill is a national saint and that to criticise him is blasphemy. Or, secondly, those that believe he was a genocidal monster who embodied imperialism and white supremacism. But there is a third option. And that is that Churchill was a flawed wartime leader who committed racist atrocities.

But Rees-Mogg’s attempt to defend one of the most indefensible episodes in Churchill’s past is a step too far. And it reveals the desperate lengths some will go to protect Churchill’s reputation.

Featured image via Twitter – Piers Disappears 

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I hate to break it to people but Winston Churchill wasn’t this infallible war hero as he’s often made out to be. People should read Peter Hitchens’s superb myth busting book “The Phony Victory: The World War II Illusion” and everything Grace said about Churchill was spot on and if people can’t have mature discussions about his legacy then I’m sorry but history and politics isn’t the subject for you have fun in PR and propaganda making or better yet just stick to real estate and finance. and Jacob Rees Mogg revisionist history of Churchill’s war crimes in the Boer Wars and gassing of anti-colonial fighters in the Middle East is disgusting and THAT should cause a bigger controversy then John McDonnell’s comments, Churchill enabled fascism in Spain and Portugal, liked Hitler and Mussolini because of their rabid anti-communist, anti-worker’s views, and supported fascist and Nazi collaborators to take back Greece after WWII and supported the concentration camps way before and after WII when anti-colonialists made trouble for the empire so people can fuck off with his “he defeated Hitler so give him a pass”. Grace Blakely did good at presenting the case against Churchill and again if people can’t hack it then history and politics isn’t the subject for you.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.