On 21 February, Republican senator Marco Rubio issued a chilling threat to Iván Hernández, Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro’s military counter-intelligence chief. Donald Trump’s administration publicly targeted Hernández on 15 February. It accused him, and several other democratically appointed officials, of “significant corruption and fraud against the people of Venezuela”.
Rubio’s tweet, meanwhile, appeared to threaten both Hernández and his family:
Do you really want to be more loyal to #Maduro than to your own family?
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) February 21, 2019
The US government and corporate media continue to push a narrative that Venezuelan people must be ‘liberated’ from Maduro. This narrative insists that he’s actively starving the population by rejecting US ‘humanitarian aid‘ (it already receives aid from elsewhere). Yet as the US continues to stockpile aid on the Venezuelan border, international aid agencies including the UN and Red Cross have criticised its attempts to ‘politicise’ aid.
Tensions are mounting since Washington-backed opposition leader Juan Guaidó:
designated Saturday [23 February] as the day the opposition will defy Maduro and begin to force emergency aid across the border.
As The Canary‘s John McEvoy reported, the issue of humanitarian aid in Venezuela is complex. Not least because the current economic crisis is largely of Washington’s making. If the US did want to help ordinary Venezuelans, it would halt the economic sanctions that cost the country billions (dwarfing its $20m ‘aid’ offering). Instead, it continues to intensify sanctions.
Rubio’s latest threat is symptomatic of the ongoing violence of the Trump administration. And as journalist Dan Cohen noted, it’s worthy of further investigation if US crimes in Venezuela are ever investigated:
Rubio is threatening the Commander of Venezuela’s Presidential Honor Guard and his family. If there is ever a tribunal for American crimes against Venezuela, this seems like it would be obvious evidence. https://t.co/CfYToGIshL
— Dan Cohen (@dancohen3000) February 21, 2019
Others also noted the Mob-like nature of Rubio’s threat:
Rubio is behaving like a mafia don. Someday, as you suggest, he may very well be called to account.
— Eve Ottenberg (@OttenbergEve) February 21, 2019
This sure sounds like a blackmail threat made by @marcorubio , the kind that the Mob would make about hurting someone’s family.
— Said Arikat (@SMArikat) February 21, 2019
Meanwhile, others saw it as a clear death threat:
Tweet reported as a death threat
— ivan (@IArcini) February 21, 2019
Did same, because that is exactly what it is. A threat to do violence and harm.
— σύναψις (@0000bytes) February 21, 2019
This is not Rubio’s first threat. On 17 February, he told CNN:
The aid is going to get through. I think ultimately the question is whether it gets through in a way that he’s cooperative with or in a way that he’s not.
Rubio’s well-established hard-right politics have earned him a key role in Trump’s administration. As The New Republic reported, he’s used “the Trump presidency to elevate his stature and amass power”. The president, meanwhile, values Rubio’s influence in Florida, a key electoral state. As a result, Rubio is widely seen as “the force behind” Trump’s push for a Venezuelan coup. More worrying is that:
Rubio has hounded Trump to take a hardline stance against the so-called “troika of tyranny”: Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua. This agenda includes ousting Maduro from the presidential palace in Caracas, lifting the Obama-era detente with Havana, and supporting [opposition to] Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega and his leftist Sandinista Party in Managua.
Now, it seems, Rubio is pushing his ruthless imperialist and interventionist politics to a new and truly chilling level.
Featured images via US Senate/Wikimedia and Mohamed Elmaazi
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?