US special envoy to Venezuela Elliott Abrams ruled out direct US military action in Venezuela during a phone conversation with Russian pranksters. The pranksters, known as Vovan and Lexus, posed as Swiss officials and managed to keep Abrams talking for over 20 minutes.
“We could look like fools”
Posing as the Swiss president, one of the pranksters told Abrams:
You know… what I worry about? If [Venezuelan opposition leader] Mr. Guaidó will lose… we could look like fools.
Get the news that really mattersSign me up
Abrams responded with advice to freeze Venezuelan accounts:
I don’t think so… What certainly I can say the Swiss government can take note of is that this is a dispute… and if there is a dispute then it would seem that the better wisdom would be to freeze the [Venezuelan bank] accounts.
The ‘Swiss president’ also told Abrams that Russia had sent “large amounts of money” to Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro and his allies through Swiss bank accounts. Abrams responded:
Now, it’s really not possible that the monies in these accounts are gotten legally. I mean, you know, the president of a country cannot have hundreds of millions of dollars in a personal account.
These seem like particularly strange comments from a man serving under billionaire Donald Trump.
Abrams: “we think it is useful to keep them nervous”
Talking with another ‘Swiss official’, meanwhile, Abrams gave revealing comments about US military action in Venezuela. The ‘official’ asked Abrams: “what are your thoughts about possible military aid to [self-declared] president Guaidó?”
You know, we are not going to do that. Unless the [Maduro] regime does something completely crazy like attacking the US embassy.
He then spoke about Washington’s efforts to spook Venezuelan officials:
But our information suggests that people in the [Maduro] regime and in the [Venezuelan] military are actually nervous about a US invasion. And we think it is useful to keep them nervous.
When I give private briefings to members of congress, this is exactly what I say to them: ‘we are not trying to make you in congress nervous. We are trying to make the Venezuelan military nervous. And we think it is a mistake tactically to give them endless reassurances that there will never be American military action.’
But as former UN independent expert Alfred de Zayas recently told The Canary in an exclusive interview:
Sabre-rattling and agitation… violate article 20(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which stipulates: ‘Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.’
The ‘Swiss president’ asked Abrams “who is that strange woman who accused you of some crimes?”.
There is a tradition of being extremely friendly and nice – called Minnesota nice. And she apparently is trying to destroy this image.
So it seems, in Abrams’ view, that Omar was being ‘mean’ for highlighting his bloodstained legacy throughout Latin America.
The main threat
Though Abrams ruled out direct US military action, the main threat of US intervention remains via covertly funded operations channelled through the Colombian or Brazilian military. US sanctions, meanwhile, have long been economically strangling the country’s population.
Those opposed to US imperialism should continue to condemn any form of intervention: diplomatic, economic, and military.
Featured image via US department of state/Flickr
- In the UK: write to your MP and ask them to oppose the coup and return Venezuela’s gold to the Maduro government (which the UK is withholding) to help alleviate the suffering of Venezuela’s people.
- In the US: write to your Congressperson and demand that they oppose the coup and end the crippling US sanctions that are exacerbating the humanitarian situation.
- Read previous Canary articles on Venezuela – and for more Global articles, follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?