On 22 September, delegates at the Labour Party annual conference in Brighton voted for a motion to abolish private schools. The plan would see the removal of their charitable status and a redistribution of their properties to the state. Delegates approved this motion to become part of Labour’s next election manifesto.
It’s a radical proposal that could revolutionise the British education system. And while you might expect some opposition to this move, nonsensical analogies, like the one from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, make no sense at all.
First they came for the private schools…
— Jimmy Wales (@jimmy_wales) September 22, 2019
An illogical comparison
Wales clearly took exception to the vote. And it is of course his right to disagree. But taking the vote result completely out of context and drawing the most bizarre and horrendous of analogies is not helpful. Particularly if this misleads the debate. Unfortunately, the Wikipedia founder couldn’t see it for the progressive move that it is.
Wales’ statement draws on the Martin Niemöller quote which laments that many Germans were complicit in Nazi persecution and murder of millions by their silence. So exactly how this applies here is a mystery. And it appeared to be a mystery to many who took to social media.
People on social media put this outrageous comparison in its place. Initially, people were just shocked:
Really? Seriously? You are equating private schools’ losing charitable tax status with being a victim of the Nazis?
— Nearly Legal (@nearlylegal) September 22, 2019
Cool way to appropriate the line “first they came for the socialists” discussing the literal murder and imprisonment of socialists so that you can pretend that addressing societal inequality is in any way comparable.
— Please plant trees now (@JosieLong) September 22, 2019
Imagine thinking it's ok to replace 'socialists' in that poem with basically the opposite.
What the hell.
— Catrìona Faolain 🏳️⚧️🏴 (@CatisinSpace) September 22, 2019
Another person, somewhat humorously, attempted to follow his logic:
Then they came for the yachts, and I did not speak out.
Then they came for the offshore accounts in the Cayman Islands, and I did not speak out.
— Jonny and 69,420 others (@BoJosCatamite) September 22, 2019
And finally someone threw his lack of logic back in his face:
You'll note that the first line of that poem actually reads "First they came for the socialists…", which is exactly what you're currently doing.
— Jon 🚩 (@JonTheEgg) September 22, 2019
Wales’ comment is even more confusing when Wikipedia itself claims to “set learning free”.
But regardless of Wales’ comment, grassroots campaigners and supporters celebrated the vote as a victory:
🌟We did it!🌟
Labour members passed our motion *unanimously* to integrate private schools into the state sector in the next manifesto.
This is the power of the grassroots in action.
— Labour Against Private Schools (@AbolishEton) September 22, 2019
— #A man without property #LoveNHS (@wezlangdon) September 22, 2019
Comedian David Schneider welcomed it in a humorous yet honest fashion:
There are few stronger arguments for getting rid of public schools than the fact that they gave us these two: pic.twitter.com/u9qobptNuE
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) September 22, 2019
The problem with private education
The campaign to abolish private schools has been underway for some time. Some believe private schools “have held an untouchable air in this country”, and that they damage society, as some get into positions of power “on the basis of wealth rather than talent”. But now Labour promises to end all that by agreeing to include the outcome of this vote in its next election manifesto.
A parent wanting the best for their child is natural. But it’s not natural that it should come at the expense of wider society. While this vote might just be election policy, it’s a significant steps towards making our society a lot fairer.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?