Swinson hates Corbyn so much, she’ll back a Tory Brexit to keep him out of government

Jo Swinson and Boris Johnson
Fréa Lockley

Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson has made no secret of the fact that she won’t work with Jeremy Corbyn. Now, she’s taken that to a new level and agreed to back Boris Johnson’s Brexit – with one condition. She said she’ll back any version of his deal if there’s a referendum attached. New evidence, however, suggests that this move could actually seal the deal for us to leave the EU on Johnson’s terms.

“No matter how bad a deal it is”

Swinson has categorically refused to work with Corbyn. The Lib Dems’ ardent Remain position meant they promised to revoke Article 50 and just ignore UK voters who opted to leave the EU; and they’ve since welcomed Tories with terrible records into their party as long as they back this anti-Brexit mission. Now, Swinson’s gone one step further, saying she’ll back any version of Johnson’s deal if it includes a referendum.

Kay Burley pinned Swinson down about her latest proposition on Sky Newssaying:

You have to vote in favour of it [a deal] with the attachment of a second referendum in order for it to go to the people. It can’t otherwise.

Seemingly not quite getting it, Swinson replied:

we will vote for a second referendum. Anything that doesn’t have a second referendum attached will not be securing Liberal Democrat votes.

So Burley laid it out very clearly and asked:

No matter how bad a deal it is, you’ll agree to it as long as it has a second referendum?

Swinson didn’t like this, and claimed this wasn’t “agreeing to the deal”. She criticised Johnson for not making “any reference to the public” in his current Brexit negotiations. “This,” she claimed, “is people’s lives we’re talking about.”

But Burley saw straight through this and made it very clear what Swinson was actually saying:

That will mean agreeing to Boris Johnson’s deal, whatever form it’s in, as long as it has a second referendum attached.

Somehow, Swinson still didn’t get it and claimed “it’s not agreeing to the deal. It’s agreeing to give the public the choice”. But Burley wasn’t giving up and explained:

Ok, let’s say voting in favour of it then, which you will have to do in order to get it through the house.

Not surprisingly, many people pointed out how dangerous Swinson’s position is:

But there’s a further twist to Swinson’s latest betrayal.

Leave or Remain?

Swinson seems utterly convinced that the public would vote to stay in the EU. But according to a new poll by ComRes, this may not be the case.

The largest poll since 2016 suggests that most people still favour Brexit, and that 54% of the British public favour respecting the referendum to leave the EU:

The 54% result comes from removing those who voted “don’t know”:

So if Swinson sticks with the line of backing a deal to get a second referendum, she and the Lib Dems could well secure Johnson’s Brexit no matter what kind of deal that is. This does, of course, contradict the Evening Standard‘s analysis of all the polls since the referendum that indicated people want to stay in the EU. But it’s still a pretty huge gamble to take.

Of course, if Swinson really did want to stop an elitist Tory Brexit, she’d back Corbyn. Because the Labour position is to prevent a no-deal situation, secure a good deal and a general election, and then reach out to both Leave and Remain voters by putting a new vote to the public.

Swinson can’t be trusted, though, especially considering her terrible record of supporting austerity. She’s actually more Tory than some Tories. So perhaps we shouldn’t be at all surprised by her latest move.

Featured images via Flickr – Liberal Democrats and ©UK Parliament – Jessica Taylor

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us