As Boris Johnson’s government plunges the UK further into political chaos, a ‘No 10 source’ has been very busy. Some of the UK’s most influential political journalists seem to be repeating whatever this unnamed and unverified source says. But this isn’t journalism, it’s propaganda. And both the BBC and ITV‘s political editors have turned up the megaphone as full-on government mouthpieces.
“Everything else is propaganda”
In a scathing analysis of Boris Johnson’s “fake news machine”, journalist Peter Oborne wrote:
It’s chilling. From the Mail, The Times to the BBC and ITN, everyone is peddling Downing Street’s lies and smears. They’re turning their readers into dupes.
He also notes:
Dodgy stories and commentary linked to Downing Street or government sources started to appear in the press and media after Johnson installed his own media team, which was largely drawn from the Vote Leave campaign
And now nameless government ‘sources’, helped by political editors, are spreading “lies, misrepresentations, smears and falsehoods” across the establishment media.
The BBC‘s Laura Kuenssberg is one of the key players in this game. ‘No 10’ confirms and says a lot to her these days. But as Carole Cadwalladr noted, if government sources won’t go on the record, it’s just propaganda:
No offence to Laura, but we’ve learned the hard way. This literally means fuck all. It’s not even fake news, it’s non news. Non-verifiable, non-accountable, non-sense. Quote on the record or ignore. Everything else is propaganda https://t.co/mRZGYSWzS5
— Carole Cadwalladr (@carolecadwalla) October 22, 2019
And ITV‘s Robert Peston is just as bad:
This evening @Peston feigning responsibility as a mouthpiece for disinformation from an unnamed source in No. 10 – is lamentable. He knows his job is to hold the government to account. He's made a choice not to. #DemocracyFail
— Jane Samuels (@Jane_Samuels) October 22, 2019
meant there were two government positions. One for the courts: that the government would obey the law. One passed on uncritically by the BBC political editor: that it would find a way to get round it. Kuenssberg’s tweets carried with them the implication that Johnson was deliberately deceiving a British court.
And Peston’s done similar things too.
The UN’s Mark Seddon suggests that pushing whatever these sources say out to audiences without research or analysis “isn’t journalism, it is stenography”:
'Sources close to', isn't journalism, it is stenography. If the BBC and ITN can't get senior correspondents such as Laura Kuenssberg & Robert Peston to appreciate this, they will forgive us if we switch off. https://t.co/ogEvutGzak
— Mark Seddon (@MarkSeddon1962) October 22, 2019
On the box
Kuenssberg and Peston hold highly influential positions. Ofcom’s 2019 News Consumption in the UK report found:
BBC One is the most-used news source among all adults (58%), followed by ITV (40%)
What’s also important, is that while TV news audiences are falling, more people are turning to social media as a news source. Kuenssberg has 1.11 million Twitter followers, Peston 1.03 million. They share their No 10 sources on social media, and it doesn’t take long for this to infiltrate the news cycle.
Oborne noted that Dominic Cummings, Johnson’s senior adviser, is thought to be behind this. In March, Cummings refused to appear before the digital, culture, media and sport (DCMS) committee. It was investigating fake news stories during the Brexit campaign. He was found in contempt of parliament.
On 22 October, the Spectator reported that Dominic Slack-Oxley is “the biggest source of fake news in Britain”. Backed by Cummings, he’s thought to be the ‘No 10 source’. According to Nick Cohen, Slack-Oxley also has two other ‘identities’. He’s part Robert Oxley, “Johnson’s press secretary, and a former spin-doctor for Vote Leave”. He’s also James Slack, who branded judges “Enemies of the People” in the Mail. in 2016. Cohen also explained:
The trouble with the Johnson administration is that it has taken existing conventions and pushed them to the point where political correspondents are complicit in disinformation campaigns.
As tonight Westminster correspondents have – yet again – been conned by Johnson's spin machine, I'm reposting my piece from earlier today on how they have become the Tories' useful idiots and how they can break freehttps://t.co/rkQ8MDwqwV
— Nick Cohen (@NickCohen4) October 22, 2019
What’s it like to be publicly humiliated @Peston @bbclaurak ? You both have been by Johnson’s media manipulator – ‘Meet Dominic Slack-Oxley: the biggest source of fake news in Britain’ https://t.co/M9HexOOlfg
— Kevin Pascoe 🌹🏴 #GTTO (@KevinPascoe) October 23, 2019
Luckily, many people are waking up to this:
How many more times does 'a source in No. 10 says' have to be bollocks before journalists stop uncritically quoting them?
— Brian Moore (@brianmoore666) October 22, 2019
Including a former Conservative MP:
When will journalists stop retailing the constant stream of bullshit emanating from No 10 “senior sources” aka Cummings and Cain? The PM won’t pull bill after winning second reading. He won’t call EU leaders urging them to refuse extension because that would be against the law.
— Nick Boles MP (@NickBoles) October 22, 2019
It’s clearer than ever that Kuenssberg and Peston are right there at the heart of this Tory propaganda game. And with the country in crisis, that’s incredibly dangerous.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.