Gordon Brown has backed Keir Starmer’s bid for the Labour leadership, saying Starmer “has all the qualifications that are necessary for a Prime Minister of the future”.
Not quite the “ringing endorsement”
Brown was a key part of Tony Blair’s Thatcherism-lite government, taking the reins when Blair stepped down. He was also highly prone to public gaffes. And when the public finally got to assess his leadership in the 2010 general election, Labour got 8,609,527 votes (29% of people who voted). This compares to the party’s 9,347,273 (30.4%) in 2015, 12,877,918 (40%) in 2017, and 10,295,912 (32.2%) in 2019.
Brown had been prime minister for less than two months when the financial crisis began in the summer of 2007, but had been chancellor during the previous decade when the problems in the global banking system had gone unnoticed and unchecked.
Brown oversaw a multi-billion-pound bailout of the banks. And when Iceland let its banks fail, prosecuted bankers, and bailed out its citizens instead (actions leading to a strong economic recovery), Brown put its government on the UK’s terrorism list.
It’s perhaps this record that led many people to be unimpressed by Brown’s endorsement of Starmer:
Gordon Brown is backing @Keir_Starmer
Gordon Brown was the PM who decided – overnight – that investment banks needed to be bailed out, and that working people would pay it back.
— RedHerring (@CoastKerry) March 5, 2020
Even Gordon Brown didn't have the qualifications necessary, unfortunately, so I'm not sure this is the ringing endorsement the pundit brigade are going to pretend it is
— Mason's Grift #RLB4Leader #Burgon4Deputy (@arachnochist) March 5, 2020
Gordon Brown is not a good example of Labour governments doing incredible things.
— Stream Of Icebergs (@IcebergStream) March 5, 2020
Featured image and additional material via Press Association
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?