The desperate Telegraph just ripped off a story from independent media

‘Desperate times call for desperate measures’, as the saying goes. And there’s none more desperate than the UK’s corporate press. Not least among these is the Telegraph, which seems to have just ripped off an article from an independent media outlet without so much as a ‘thank you’.
‘Carbon copying’…?
Mary Fitzgerald is the editor-in-chief of openDemocracy. It’s an independent website which provides in-depth analysis of UK and global issues. And recently, it ran a massive exclusive story on coronavirus (Covid-19). But as Fitzgerald tweeted:
Front page @Telegraph 'scoop' is a carbon copy of @openDemocracy's exclusive 2 days ago.
'Leaked memo seen by Telegraph' already 'seen' by:
– 111k readers on @openDemocracy
– @Peston's 1m followers
– Pretty much anyone who's following #coronavirusUK right nowGreat work guys! https://t.co/feX3fGIfmZ
— Mary Fitzgerald (@maryftz) April 22, 2020
Read on...
Support us and go ad-free
Yes, the Telegraph did indeed appear to rip off an openDemocracy article. The openDemocracy piece from 20 April was about the tests that the NHS uses for coronavirus. In short, openDemocracy revealed that 25% of these tests could fail to detect the virus. It also found that there were other problems with the test. This came from a leaked memo openDemocracy got its hands on from the National Infection Service (NIS). And the story yet again throws into question the government’s response to the pandemic.
Naughty, naughty
You can read the full openDemocracy article here. Late on 21 April, the Telegraph published an oddly similar article. It too detailed the document, but it claimed that it was “seen by the Telegraph“. In fact, openDemocracy had put it in the public domain. And as Fitzgerald said, the Telegraph article was a “carbon copy” of openDemocracy‘s. So she asked people to tell the Telegraph what they thought of its “scoop”:
Please RT widely and let @Telegraph what you think about their marvellous 'scoop'.
And if you'd like to consider supporting trustworthy, public interest journalism that isn't locked behind a paywall, you can do so here. Thank you. https://t.co/L0Fz86TS7O
— Mary Fitzgerald (@maryftz) April 22, 2020
And several people did say what they thought of the Telegraph‘s ‘work’:
Maybe @Telegraph's motto is "YESTERDAY'S NEWS – TOMORROW!"
— ГОРЕСТ ФЪМП (@SomniNaut) April 22, 2020
The Borrisograph doesn't do journalism so has to steal someone else's
— Kenneth Heal (@KennethHeal1) April 22, 2020
Terrible the amount of banditry that goes on among journalists. I don’t know how they feel no shame stealing credit for others’ work.
— Joani Walsh (@joaniwalshi) April 22, 2020
Begging bowls at the ready
The Canary asked the Telegraph for comment. We specifically wanted to know why it had not credited openDemocracy as the source of the leak. But it had not responded at the time of publication.
On 19 April, corporate journalists went full-on ‘begging bowl’ after the Sunday Times published a ‘scoop’ on Boris Johnson. As The Canary reported, they took issue with the fact that people were annoyed about the article being behind a paywall – apparently not seeing the problem with critical pandemic information only being accessible to those who could afford it. But moreover, the attitude of corporate journalists to their own role in the current crisis reeked of wilful ignorance.
Now, with the Telegraph effectively nicking another outlet’s story, the desperation of corporate media to seem relevant and somehow important is becoming nauseating. So please, read the openDemocracy article. Not the Telegraph‘s.
Featured image via HonestReporting – Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.