Matt Hancock needn’t have worried about the Labour leader savaging him on Sunday 21 February’s political TV programmes. Because Keir Starmer completely let the embattled health secretary off the hook.
Hancock: flouting his ‘legal obligations’
The Canary reported on Saturday 20 February about a High Court ruling. As it noted:
The Government is required by law to publish a “contract award notice” within 30 days of the award of any contracts for public goods or services worth more than £120,000.
But the Good Law Project and a cross-party group of MPs said the Tories didn’t do this. And a judge agreed with them. He said:
There is now no dispute that, in a substantial number of cases… [Hancock] breached his legal obligation to publish contract award notices within 30 days of the award of contracts.
There is also no dispute that… [Hancock] failed to publish redacted contracts in accordance with the transparency policy.
So, were the Sunday 21 February political TV shows awash with calls for Hancock to quit? Of course not.
Starmer: let me wring my hands
First up was Labour leader Keir Starmer on Sophy Ridge on Sunday. Moments before, the host asked Hancock if he should resign. “No”, was his predictable answer. So, Ridge posed the same question to the Labour leader. And again, ‘no’ was the predictable (but ridiculous) answer. Starmer said:
I don’t want to call for him to resign. I do think he’s wrong about the contracts. There’s been a lot of problems with the contracts: on transparency, on who the contracts have gone to, and there’s been a lot of wasted money. And I think that is a real cause for concern. But at the moment, at this stage of the pandemic, I want all government ministers working really hard to get us through this.
And he also said:
But I think at this stage, calling for people to resign is not what the public really wants to see.
#Ridge – Should Matt Hancock resign after being found to have acted unlawfully over not publishing covid-19 contracts?
— Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) February 21, 2021
Starmer thinks there have been “problems” with the PPE contracts. Feel free to shout “FFS” while you read this. Because there haven’t been “problems”. There’s been unlawful activity from a senior government minister.
Over on The Andrew Marr Show, and things weren’t much better.
Lammy: missed Starmer’s ‘hand-wringing’ memo
First up, and shadow justice secretary David Lammy was at odds with Starmer. He said that Hancock:
should publish the contracts, because the court has found it unlawful. He should cancel the… temporary scheme that he’s been using without any accountability or any transparency. He should come to parliament on Monday and explain what he’s going to do. It is outrageous, frankly… This is the sort of behaviour, giving contracts to your pub landlord and your best mate, that you would expect in a banana republic.
Ouch. Clearly Starmer’s ‘hand-wringing on the fence’ briefing hadn’t got to Lammy.
#marr – Matt Hancock was found to have acted unlawfully…. what do you think should happen now?
David Lammy – He should publish the contracts… this is the sort of behaviour, giving contracts to your pub landlord & your best mate, that you would expect in a banana republic. pic.twitter.com/00poRxZCrP
— Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) February 21, 2021
Then Hancock was on to defend his and the government’s actions.
Pulling on heart strings, disaster capitalist-style
my team were working seven days a week, often 18 hours a day, to get hold of the equipment that was saving lives.
Indeed: ‘getting hold of equipment’ from Hancock’s family friends; Tory Party-linked firms and donors, and a hotel carpet company. Yet the health secretary repeatedly used the ‘saving lives’ line to defend his and his government’s cronyism. Marr asked Hancock to apologise for breaching the law. He predictably didn’t. And Hancock even had the audacity to say the country should be “grateful” for his department doing its job.
But of course, Hancock whitewashing cronyism, exploiting a global crisis, and showing wilful negligence is all in a days work for our disaster capitalist-led government.
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop