Pressure on the Jewish Chronicle grows after calls for a press regulator investigation

The Jewish Chronicle logo
Support us and go ad-free

A group of interested parties has asked the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) to investigate the Jewish Chronicle (JC). It’s over the media outlet’s repeated breaches of the regulator’s standards. Many of the people calling for the probe have won cases against it. IPSO is reportedly considering whether to carry out such an investigation.

The JC: various misdemeanours

As Labour councillor Jo Bird tweeted:

IPSO recently ruled in Bird’s favour against the JC. As SKWAWKBOX reported, it found that information the JC published about Bird was inaccurate and “breached the editor’s code”.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
A ‘systemic problem’

The letter to IPSO says:

Dear Lord Faulks,

We welcome IPSO’s agreement to consider Jo Bird’s proposal for a Standards Investigation into the Jewish Chronicle and we urge you to launch such an investigation without delay. With 28 recorded breaches of the Editors’ Code and four libel defeats in just three years, it is clear that the paper’s editorial standards are shockingly low and IPSO’s actions to date have made no difference.

We have all either seen our complaints to IPSO about the Jewish Chronicle’s bad journalism upheld or secured admissions of libel from the paper. Unless standards there improve there will be more victims, while readers will continue to be misled.

IPSO’s regulations say a Standards Investigation can take place where there is evidence of ‘serious and systemic breaches of the code’. The seriousness of the breaches by the Jewish Chronicle is attested to in IPSO’s own rulings while the sheer number of breaches and libel defeats – taking place at a small publication that appears only weekly – proves the problem is systemic.

We would be grateful if you would circulate this letter to all IPSO board members and to senior management.

Numerous victims

It was signed by:

  • Jo Bird.
  • John Davies.
  • Ibrahim Hewitt.
  • Jenny Lennox.
  • Kal Ross.
  • Mike Sivier.
  • Thomas Suarez.
  • Marc Wadsworth.
  • Audrey White.
“It’s time to talk about the Jewish Chronicle”

All the people name above are claimants who’ve won victories against the JC over inaccurate content it published about them. For example, as The Canary recently reported, Wadsworth won a legal battle against the JC. It published completely fabricated information about him, and a court ruled in Wadsworth’s favour. This meant the JC had to publish an apology and pay Wadsworth damages.

SKWAWKBOX made a video about the JC‘s repeated breaches:

IPSO says…

A spokesperson for IPSO confirmed to The Canary that it had received Bird’s letter. They said:

IPSO actively monitors complaints, compliance with the Editors’ Code and the wider media landscape to ensure publishers uphold the highest possible standards. We aim to take action to address issues of concern in a proportionate way, ideally at an early stage. IPSO recently delivered training on Editors’ Code compliance to staff at the Jewish Chronicle, a service which is available to all regulated publishers.

IPSO can undertake a standards investigation where it has serious concerns about the behaviour or actions of one of its regulated publishers. These concerns could include serious and systemic breaches of the Editors’ Code; where a publisher’s annual compliance statement raises significant concerns; or in exceptional circumstances, because of substantial legal issues or Editors’ Code compliance issues.

IPSO’s Board makes any decision about whether or not to launch a standards investigation after careful consideration of all available evidence.

Whether or not IPSO acts on the complainant’s calls for an investigation remains to be seen.

Featured image via the Jewish Chronicle – screengrab

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us