Hundreds of people complain to the BBC about ‘Sickness and Lies’

Sickness and Lies screen grab and a BBC comment
Support us and go ad-free

A BBCdocumentary‘ called Sickness and Lies sparked hundreds of complaints from people. It revealed the figures in a fortnightly bulletin. And it’s no wonder that so many people kicked off. Because the show was nothing short of toxic.

Sickness and Lies: an ironic title

As The Canary previously reported, Sickness and Lies is about chronically ill people who other people accuse of faking or exaggerating their conditions. It looks at a Reddit group which accuses chronic illness influencers of these things. But the show was riddled with problems.

It presented incorrect assumptions about illnesses. The documentary showed that sometimes the Reddit group didn’t know what it was talking about. It platformed somewhat dubious psychiatry. But moreover, it fed-into the age-old stigma that chronic illness is ‘all in people’s heads’.

‘All in your head’

As The Canary previously wrote:

The psychologisation of physical illnesses has been happening for many years. That is, when a doctor can’t find a physical cause for a person’s illness, they claim their mental health is causing it; ‘psychosomatic‘ or, it is ‘all in their heads’. Generally this is nonsense.

And:

Medical misogyny is another factor in accusations of fakery. The majority of people Sickness and Lies featured were women. The insinuation that a woman is wrong/stupid, or is making her illnesses up, is all too common in the medical and scientific communities – and in society more broadly.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Not that the BBC seemed to care. Because the show is still up on iPlayer. But people affected by chronic illness were furious and distressed.

BBC: a token gesture

So, as Disability News Service (DNS) reported, the BBC ended up deleting the tweet promoting Sickness and Lies. One social media user had screen-grabbed it:

A spokesperson told DNS that:

The original tweet does not reflect the full context of the programme and was removed.

“LOL” may be an apt response to this. Because a lot of people felt the BBC tweet did “reflect the full”, noxious “context” of the show.  So much so they complained in their hundreds.

Complaints roll in

Sickness and Lies got the BBC its most complaints in nearly two months. 615 people felt so strongly they contacted the BBC over it. Previously, over 6,000 people complained about its coverage of the Euros 2020 broadcast on 12 June. Prior to that, the BBC had not got this level of complaints over a programme since 23 May.

Thousands have now signed a petition calling on the BBC to take down the show. You can add your name here.

People made their feelings clear on social media. Rhiann Johns called Sickness and Lies “abhorrent”:

Danielle told the BBC that chronically ill people’s “lives aren’t your clickbait”:

One Twitter user who wished to remain anonymous complained to the BBC. They got a response. It was obtuse at best. The BBC said:

it was important to investigate this story and give a voice to the lived experiences of those who have chronic illnesses

BBC Response to a Sickness and Lies complaint

Yeah. That’s really not what happened in Sickness and Lies, though – is it?

Do not watch it

As writer Morgan Peschek, who curates the site A Kinky Autistic, said:

So, should you watch this wildly irresponsible and/or directly malicious documentary? Honestly, if you’re disabled, I wouldn’t recommend it – you won’t learn anything new, you’ll just be reminded how many people think you’re a liar and just how unsafe disabled people are in the world.

There’s no excuse for the BBC making then broadcasting Sickness and Lies. And the reaction of people with lived experience of chronic illness sums this up.

Featured image via BBC iPlayer – screengrab and The Canary (supplied)

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. All part of the nomalisation of the American insurance company perversion of the biopsychosocial model, which suggests pain or disability is the fault of the subject, so as to deny them payouts. This is the attitude which, thanks to Peter Lilley in the 90s, was adopted and practiced by the DWP in order to deny benefits to perfectly deserving claimants.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.