Cuts to social services to pay for £12 billion windfall to arms companies

Emily Apple

Cash-strapped Britain has announced a £12 billion increase in the country’s war chest, including 8 BAE warships, 9 Boeing maritime patrol crafts, surveillance drones and Lockheed Martin jets. Similarly, the cost for replacing the Trident nuclear programme is spiralling out of control, with another £6 billion added to the budget, bringing the cost to £31 billion, with another £10 billion being set aside for contingencies.

That’s potentially an extra £53 billion that the government is prepared to spend on war, not social services.

Whilst the arms dealers rub their hands in glee at another increase in profits following a terrorist attack, George Osborne announced in his Autumn Statement, that despite reversing some of the cuts to tax credits, he has still made £12 billion in welfare cuts. Coincidentally, this is the same amount being added to the military budget (not including trident), as the poorest in society continue being punished.

Speaking on Radio 5 on 23 November 2015 (at 02.23), Defence Secretary Michael Fallon didn’t even try to pretend that this increase in military spending was not linked to welfare budgets, stating the need

to spend less on some things like the welfare system and to spend more on things that really matter to keep our country safe.

There has undoubtedly been an increase in global terrorism. However, whilst scaremongering over Paris-style attacks on the streets of the UK has been widespread, the figures are stark – there were 0 deaths in the UK from terrorism in 2014. Furthermore, according to the Global Terrorism Index, only 2.6% of deaths from terrorism over the past 15 years have been in the West.

Let’s contrast this with, for example, the deaths attributed to the ‘fit for work’ Work Capability Assessments (WCA). As recently reported in The Canary, experts from Oxford and Liverpool universities  found that between 2010 and 2013 there were 590 suicides linked to the WCA. During the same period, there were 2 deaths from terrorism on mainland Britain.

Speaking to The Canary, Andrew Smith from Campaign Against Arms Trade stated:

Time and again the government has fed us the austerity lie and told us that it can’t afford the vital services people rely on everyday. Yet it can always find extra money for militarism and war. Public money should be used for public good, not to boost arms companies’ profits.

Even if Cameron is arguing the extra weaponry will boost our ability to intervene in Syria, his argument that this will help in the fight against global terrorism is dubious. In fact, since 2000, with the military interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, there are now nine times more deaths from terrorism.

Furthermore, airstrikes in Syria are adding to existing problems and casualties, with the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reporting that 526 civilians, including 137 children had been killed by Russian airstrikes.

Increased military spending will not make the UK safer, and raining yet more bombs on ravaged parts of the globe will not protect anyone. It’s time to question where our money is being spent, and start demanding it is used on ensuring the poorest in society are protected rather than lining the pockets of arms dealers. We have to show the government that welfare matters more to us than warfare – in doing so, we will build a fairer, more compassionate and safer society.

Featured image via DVIDSHUB

 

 

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed